went into a rage and started pummeling my face as I lie on the couch. I took psy's suggestion and let him hit me some more after I got off the couch
Dad~
I have to seriously disagree with psy's advise on this matter. This is abuse ... pure and simple. NO ONE has the right to "pummel" someone else for ANY reason.
You are sending your son the message that physical violence is an appropriate method of expressing his emotions. That it is OK to punch a human being when he doesn't get his way.
Someday, he will take that lesson to his marriage. When his wife does not give in to his protestations and emotional manipulations, he will resort to making her his human punching bag.
Perhaps someday when he is confronted by a boss, he will resort to physical violence to make his point.
Or God forbid, someday when he has a child of his own he will resort to punching when he has no better anger management skill.
You are not teaching your son to be responsible. You are not teaching him to respect others. You are not teaching him to manage his anger effectively.
Violence is always wrong. ALWAYS. Next time call 911 and let him suffer the real life consequences of pummeling someone.
PSY ~ I usually respect your perspectives, but you're way off on this one. If my husband was frustrated with me for something would you honestly advise me to just let him haul off and pummel me? Or would you begin to show me that this constitutes spousal abuse? I think we both know the answer to that question.
Read why i suggested it before condemning me. Would you rather he did what he did before: pummel the kid back!?!? That didn't work. At least here, the kid admitted he didn't feel good about it. Pummeling him back would make him feel justified and further the conflict. He might feel it's ok to attack his father since he fights back. Violence is ended when one party refuses to participate in it. Period. I'm not a Christian but there is a
lot of wisdom in "turn the other cheek (offer him the other)" The father chose not to respond, and the kid felt bad about hitting him. From now on, if he attacks his father, he will do so dishonorably, by attacking a defenseless target.
The point is to make the kid feel shame. The point is for the kid to look at his father ignoring his blows and say to himself "could i do that, do i have the strength?"... The point is to make the kid realize that he hurt somebody else. Read my original advice before condemning me.
I aggree the kid probably needs anger management, but kids learn from their parents... if the father pummels the kid back.. it sends the message that pummeling each other is a rational, healthy way of dealing with family disagreements...
Maybe he needs anger management, but let's see if he stops on his own.
What good would the police do? What if the kid is stupid enough to fight back? There's a reason why it's called "less than lethal force", not "non-lethal force"... You want to put the kid in jail, and teach him that he's a total fuck-up. No. The solution is to teach the kid that he's worth something.. by giving him something positive to do, a sense of purpose. That's one reason why i think the computer school his father suggested (3 hours a day) would be a great idea for him. It only works if he finds it interesting though... which is why i asked what he was interested in.