Well why dont you humor myself and the readers and take the first one and show us how you proved it:
Lie #1: Whooter claims he never went to Chicago for a TTI meeting.
Truth #1: Whooter had already bragged about it two years ago, but must have forgotten and was quoted saying he did indeed go to Chicago for a TTI meeting. This was proven over Whooter's denials by simply quoting the post where he already admitted it.
Nice try. Now stick with the first question:
You say that I claim I never went to Chicago for a TTI meeting... First When was I asked this question and second what was my answer. How did you conclude that I lied about anything?
Sure, I'll dumb it down for you just this once.
Whooter adamantly denying he was ever in Chicago, of course, a confirmed lie.
You say both? You could probably document this Reuben guy as being there, but how do you place me there? You say you have documented evidence. Evidence would mean I was posting from Chicago at the same time this meeting took place. That may raise some eyebrows I would say. But you see you dont have that evidence because I wasnt there.
Underlined emphasis added by me...
Well, you just denied being there in that post. But of course, as we all know, you were lying and exposed for it. Here's the link where you admitted it two years ago:
Whooter, in his own words, admits to the trip he was just denying.
Well, I PM?d several people here on fornits and eventually we formed a ?Statistical group? and decided to meet at the Hyatt in Chicago about a month ago. We spent 3 days hammering out a direction and figured we would tackle the TBS sector first.
Again, you are a proven liar. We all know you do it, so why bother entertaining any more of your fallacious posts? These are just quotes of you denying what you already said. How dumb can you really be to think we wouldn't notice these lies???
Already done. In your own words you denied being in Chicago and in your own words admitted it. It's not that deep.
Funny you're quoting STICC's website to verify their "launch date." Did you notice the website wasn't even prepared or launched until a year later? So, what you're saying is if I want to be a car dealer and I incorporate to become one, my launch date or "Grand Opening" will be the same day, even though I have no dealership or any cars? That makes no sense. It's clear STICC got a rolling start with incorporation in 2004, website in 2005 and first placement solicitation in late 2006. Those are undisputed facts.
Anyway, first you denied going to Chicago, then you admitted it. One of those times you had to be lying.
As far as STICC's launch date, I was referring to when they created the Board of Advisors and went after their first placement. That was late 2006. STICC first solicited kids on August 28th, 2006, asking people if they wanted to be the first placed kid. The Board was formed in late 2006 and added to the website December 30th, 2006, right after the meeting in Chicago. That's a proven fact. Denying it only makes you look worse, if that's possible.
In any case, you have stopped disputing that you did indeed go to Chicago for a TTI meeting, now you're only disputing the phrase "launch date" as a last ditch effort, but you are failing as usual. I know what I meant when I said it and I clarified for you. I consider the "launch date" to be the first earnest effort to drum up business. If you don't agree, oh well. That issue is closed. I accused you of going to Chicago in late December, 2006. You denied it. Then you were proved to be lying in your own words.
