Exactly, STICC's was Launched in April of 2007 (I provided you a link) and I was there in January of 2007 (I provided a link). The post inwhich you stated I lied indicated that I was there prior to the launch of STICCS, which as you can see by the time line is not true.
Where is the lie?
You can continue to avoid the facts by posting another long post, Ajax13, or you can provide the readers with the steps of the lie you claim I made.
"STICC's was Launched in April of 2007 (I provided you a link)". I think you are making this up, Whooter. Show me the link you provided that STICC was launched in April, 2007. You are getting very desperate!
Post the link or you're lying again.
Still waiting for the link, Whooter. Looks like you were caught making up some "facts" again. Show the link where you prove STICC was launched in April of 2007. By the way, that also makes your visit to Chicago to be just prior to STICCs launch, according to your timetable. Looks like the OP was right after all. Whooter now admits it in the above post.
It does appear Whooter has a little problem now that he has admitted his trip to Chicago was right before STICC launched. He was denying it earlier, but seems now to have caved in and admitted the truth.
Here's something interesting that I've pointed out before. You know Reuben is a software guy and understands how search engines work, right? He's a marketing guy. We all saw how he used his son's obituary to beg for funding for STICC.
So...that being said, I have noticed that Whooter always intentionally misspells things he doesn't want to come up in a search engine to keep people from stumbling onto his connections here at Fornits. Everyone knows it's "STICC" but did you see how Whooter spelled it "STICC's" and also "STICCS" but never "STICC"? I noticed.
I also noticed when he was accused of being Reuben, every post he posted denying it he spelled "Reuben" wrong, too. He said "Rueban," and "Rueben" but never "Reuben." Obviously he doesn't want what he does here linked to STICC, so this is how he tries to minimize the impact of posting here so he doesn't draw unwatned attention to himself and STICC. Because if anyone who works with him ever got hold of his "work" here, they'd immediately know what a complete and utter fraud he is. Just a bit more evidence to support the OP's position, which is very, very strong I have to say.