Thank you, but I'm fine- although pointing out typos is always appreciated! Actually, you mention editing and that's an interesting point. I rarely get edited when I submit an article, largely because I hit word counts accurately and shave fat off my writing pretty well.
However, when I wrote THE JEKYLL SIDE OF HYDE I did not attempt to cut, even where the piece would have been made tighter by doing so. I had to get something off my chest.
Now, if we write a 5-6,000 word piece about the experiences- good and bad- that folks have had at Hyde, with the intention of helping them by performing an act of Brother's Keeper by placing Truth Above Harmony, some have wondered if doing so would place them in legal jeopardy.
Here's a thought: John Williams, the attorney we used in our case, also successfully represented another family in their suit against Hyde. He's a well respected lawyer with expertise in the protection of first amendment rights.
Why not have everyone interested in the legal issue kick in $100 to put him on retainer? If there are 50 such families, that would yield 5 grand, which Mr. Williams would put in an escrow account, to be used only if necessary, returned in full if not.
Again, the idea behind writing such an article would not be to disparage Hyde, say anything untruthful about them, or induce anyone considering the school from sending a child there. We would simply let people tell their stories in a candid fashion. Hopefully, the folks at Hyde would participate in this storytelling journey.