A PREVIOUS POST STATED:
"...Paige to think it is ok to be a co-conspirator in the kidnapping of the girl, and crossing her over state lines, in total defiance of the laws of the State of Utah."
Here is the UTAH LAW on CHILD KIDNAPPING - AMANDA IS 17 YEARS OLD - THE PERSON POSTING APPARENTLY HAS LIED AGAINST PAIGE and an alleged co-conspirator - BECAUSE UTAH LAW FOR CHILD KIDNAPPING APPLIES TO THOSE UNDER 14 YEARS OF AGE!!!
76-5-301.1. Child kidnapping.
(1) An actor commits child kidnapping if the actor intentionally or knowingly, without authority of law, and by any means and in any manner, seizes, confines, detains, or transports a child under the age of 14 without the consent of the victim's parent or guardian, or the consent of a person acting in loco parentis.
AMANDA WOULD BE CONSIDERED THE "VICTIM" UNDER UTAH LAW, SO PAIGE & HER ALLEGED CO-CONSPIRATOR COULDN'T BE GUILTY OF KIDNAPPING IN UTAH UNLESS AMANDA WAS TAKEN AGAINST HER WILL. Here's THAT UTAH LAW:
76-5-301. Kidnapping.
(1) An actor commits kidnapping if the actor intentionally or knowingly, without authority of law, and against the will of the victim...
PAIGE AND THE ALLEGED CO-CONSPIRATOR AREN'T EVEN GUILTY, ACCORDING TO UTAH LAW, OF "CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE". Here's THAT UTAH LAW BECAUSE AMANDA ISN'T UNDER THE AGE OF 16:
76-5-303. Custodial interference.
(1) A person, whether a parent or other, is guilty of custodial interference if, without good cause, the actor takes, entices, conceals, or detains a child under the age of 16 from its parent, guardian, or other lawful custodian:
COULD THIS FALSE STATEMENT BE CONSIDERED TO BE SLANDER OR LIBEL AGAINST PAIGE AND HER ALLEGED CO-CONSPIRATOR CONSIDERING WHAT UTAH LAW SAYS?
"[Paige and her co-conspirator acted] in total defiance of the laws of the State of Utah"