I am puzzled at the posting of the Strawn account on this thread. It has its own thread; as well as one other also devoted to the subject.
I suppose your slinging mud at ALA due to the occassional use of escorts? (thats all of Tara you'll ever get!!)
Do you have info on ALA ever using Strawn?
I do a little doubt it.
I think wwasp keeps him busy.
I don't understand this narrow minded view that if one is 'bad' all must be; weather we're talking about escorts or programs or dogs - whatever.
I understand the emotions behind the inclination; but surely your intellect suggests otherwise?
Posting about Strawn under this link is very appropriate. Karen who supports and advocates "ALA" and "help your teens" used Strawn and his services. Those who want to know about ALA and those who may have relied on the "wisdom" of Karen and her experience should know that she does not really have very good judgement when it comes to the care of their teens, much less her own teen.
And by the way, all programs are bad. Why? They are far to risky. Why are they too riskiy?There are many reasons. Two name only two, two that are reason enough, because they are unregulated and because they imprision minors without due process. Many parents claim to put there kids in these programs because the child is engaging in risky behavior. They see and read in the media about other teens who overdose or who are killed in car accidents as a result of their risky behavior. So they tell themselves they are saving their child from that risk. Well any parent who puts their child in a program is putting their child at risk. We read about children in programs being hurt and dying as well. Parents who risk their childs life to save their child life is a hypocrit at the very least.
One more thing, that article on Strawn, it blew me away when I read the childs curfew hours. His parents were wacko. The kid did not have a problem, his parents did. And look who is paying the price.