Cataloging TheWho/John Reuben's Lies

[Whooter]

You did the same thing to me and tried to get my identity and have me fired from my job (for god knows what, lols), but you just weren't good enough to get the job done.  If you could have, you would have.

Oh, go cry us a river, DJ.  I did no such thing, not my style.  We are not all like you, I could care less who you are.  Besides we all know you would have taken a week off of work and dedicated that time to writting a manifesto with links to my every comment it were true... and put it in your footer!!  lol

 I am starting to believe what SUCK IT is saying about you.  Check the shells in your gun again and get some rest, You are a sick person, DJ.



...

[Joel]

Edited: Wednesday, October 06, 2010

[Whooter]

You did the same thing to me and tried to get my identity and have me fired from my job (for god knows what, lols), but you just weren't good enough to get the job done.  If you could have, you would have.

Oh, go cry us a river, DJ.  I did no such thing, not my style.  We are not all like you, I could care less who you are.  Besides we all know you would have taken a week off of work and dedicated that time to writting a manifesto with links to my every comment it were true... and put it in your footer!!  lol

 I am starting to believe what SUCK IT is saying about you.  Check the shells in your gun again and get some rest, You are a sick person, DJ.



...

Are you talking about the communist manifesto Whooter?    :roflmao:  :roflmao:  :roflmao:  :roflmao:  :roflmao:

lol, No I dont think he is that bad.



...

[Troll Control]

Joel, he's just throwing a hissy because he is desperate to avoid his own statement that he has "a fiduciary interest" in Aspen Education, but tries to pass himself off as "just a regular parent with no ties to the TTI."

He said "fiduciary interest" not me.  I just linked to it and he's been having a fit ever since.  He always squeals the loudest when you repost that quote because his phony story gets all shot to hell - no pun intended ; )

Click on the link below to see it in Whooter's own post.

[Whooter]

Joel, he's just throwing a hissy because he is desperate to avoid his own statement that he has "a fiduciary interest" in Aspen Education, but tries to pass himself off as "just a regular parent with no ties to the TTI."

He said "fiduciary interest" not me.  I just linked to it and he's been having a fit ever since.  He always squeals the loudest when you repost that quote because his phony story gets all shot to hell - no pun intended ; )

Click on the link below to see it in Whooter's own post.

fiduciary interest,  wow those words really bug you, dont they.  Whats the other one....  "Children are products" lol.  I am such an evil person to think that and use fiduciary interest in a sentence.

Who is having the fit?  They are not in my footer are they?  lol



...

[Joel]

Edited: Wednesday, October 06, 2010

[Paul St. John]

The guy who use to post under the username "Odie", claimed to have been getting threatening phone calls, as well.  He said that he had to move out of his neighborhood.  He was a former daytop staff member who had a falling out.

Paul

[Troll Control]

Here Whooter claims to have intimate knowledge of an impending deal for AEG to buy HLA.  He says he can't discuss it due to his fiduciary interest and that it would be considered "tipping" if he did.

Definition of "Fiduciary Interest": n : legal term; assigned responsibility to act on behalf of an owner or owners in their best financial interest. When an individual represents a party or a group in a position of trust or confidence, it is that person’s duty to act primarily for the benefit of the party or group he/she represents. A fiduciary duty compels one to make decisions that are in the best financial interest of to the party represented.

Let me ask you, Whooter, how does "just a regular parent with no ties to the TTI" have a fiduciary interest in a transaction between two TTI entities that is so intimate to the deal that speaking about it would constitute tipping?  Exactly which party to this deal were you representing?  Which owner assigned you this responsibility?

Were you fibbing when you were bragging about this intimate knowledge and inability to speak of it due to your "fiduciary interest," or were you fibbing when you said you have "no ties to the TTI"?  Obviusly, these statements are mutually exclusive and both cannot be true.  So just tell us which one you have been shining us on about for the last five years.

[Whooter]

lol, you really work hard at this, DJ.  Here are some other possibilities to think about:

If I had a family member who owned a law firm that was asked to investigate the possible take over of one company by another then I would not be able to speak about it.  I would have a fiduciary responsibility.  Fiduciary is a loyalty.

If you had a friend who talked to you about an investigation he was actively involved in (in a professional capacity) he may ask you for your loyalty not to speak openly about it until it had passed.  If you accepted this and continued with the conversation then you would have a fiduciary responsibility towards him.

If I had a friend who were involved in the takeover of another company and he spoke to me about the details of the plan then I could be sued if I discussed it openly and I would also have a fiduciary duty to this person not to disclose any details and to hold the trust.



...

[Froderik]

Would you mind just answering the question?

[Troll Control]

As we all know already, none of those scenarios you just blathered constitute a fiduciary responsibility.  What you described would be breaches of trust between you and the person who already failed their fiduciary duty by leaking information to you and causing financial harm to the owner and having no legal bearing upon you whatsoever.

Fiduciary Responsibility = legal term: "assigned responsibility to act on behalf of an owner or owners in their best financial interest."

What you described involves third parties who may or may not have this duty, but you, if you are only an outlier to the legal enjoinder as you just laid out, cannot possibly have a fiduciary duty in the deal.

You either lied or you were assigned by a principal to work the deal.  Which is it?  You either have a fiduciary duty or you are not financially involved in the TTI.  You have claimed both.  One (or conceivably both) is a lie.  They simply cannot both be true.

[Whooter]

lol,  I think it bugs you that you are the one who lined his pockets with TTI money for years and now you desperately want to dirty up other people.

Here ya go:

A fiduciary duty is a legal or ethical relationship of confidence or trust between two or more parties, most commonly a fiduciary and a principal.




...

[Troll Control]

Here Whooter claims to have intimate knowledge of an impending deal for AEG to buy HLA.  He says he can't discuss it due to his fiduciary interest and that it would be considered "tipping" if he did.

Definition of "Fiduciary Interest": n : legal term; assigned responsibility to act on behalf of an owner or owners in their best financial interest. When an individual represents a party or a group in a position of trust or confidence, it is that person’s duty to act primarily for the benefit of the party or group he/she represents. A fiduciary duty compels one to make decisions that are in the best financial interest of to the party represented.

Let me ask you, Whooter, how does "just a regular parent with no ties to the TTI" have a fiduciary interest in a transaction between two TTI entities that is so intimate to the deal that speaking about it would constitute tipping?  Exactly which party to this deal were you representing?  Which owner assigned you this responsibility?

Were you fibbing when you were bragging about this intimate knowledge and inability to speak of it due to your "fiduciary interest," or were you fibbing when you said you have "no ties to the TTI"?  Obviusly, these statements are mutually exclusive and both cannot be true.  So just tell us which one you have been shining us on about for the last five years.

Sorry, but the definition of fiduciary responsibility is very clear and it is a legal definition, as posted above.  To have a fiduciary responsibility, one must be a direct representative of the principal or principal's group, assigned to act in their best financial interest.

[Whooter]

Its a little difficult to try to tell someone else what they meant, but keep working at it if you like

Here ya go:

A fiduciary duty is a legal or ethical relationship of confidence or trust between two or more parties, most commonly a fiduciary and a principal.

Link to Definition



...

[Troll Control]

Lols.  You seem to have forgotten to post the full definition that you are relying upon Wikipedia for:

 "Fiduciary duty is a legal or ethical relationship of confidence or trust between two or more parties, most commonly a fiduciary and a principal. One party...holds a fiduciary relation or acts in a fiduciary capacity to another, such as one whose funds are entrusted to it for investment."

You claimed to be the fiduciary (the one who has "fiduciary responsibility"), also commonly called the agent, so which one of the TTI entities, AEG or HLA was your principal?  Were you an agent of AEG or an agent of HLA?  It's a simple question, Mr. Business School Dropout.