Author Topic: idea, inspired by over the gw. the grassroots effort thread.  (Read 25988 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
idea, inspired by over the gw. the grassroots effort thread.
« Reply #105 on: October 01, 2007, 11:42:45 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
what would they do if someone refused to take their underpants off?


they'd send you to ridge creek where they are allowed to take them off for you.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline hanzomon4

  • Posts: 1334
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
idea, inspired by over the gw. the grassroots effort thread.
« Reply #106 on: October 02, 2007, 01:39:25 AM »
Quote from: ""TheWho""
Quote from: ""hanzomon4""
Quote from: ""TheWho""
Quote from: ""Guest""
what if someone just flat-out refused the strip-search and physical at intake?

Good question, the places that I am familiar with and thru people I have spoken with the children are allowed to wait it out until they feel more comfortable or an alternative solution is proposed.
The children are never forced to take their clothes off or taken off by force.  Does anyone know if programs still exist that do this?

Dude, do you not read what people post on this site? The answer is yes they still exist.

Hanzo, it is not always clear, sometimes we may be discussing procedures and stripe searches only to find out the places have closed or the person is talking about their experience 10 -30 years ago.  So it is actually unclear to me if there are TBS's (today) which will force a child to the floor..... restrain them and tear their clothes off and submit them to a cavity check.  I guess you are right, all kinds of places exist but I think we need to identify which ones so that we can pass this information on to the parents.  Some parents may not want this for their kids.


You asked if kids are still forced to take their clothes off, the answer is yes in every program that requires a strip search. Like others have said they could use "positive" peer pressure, torture, or some just hold them down and strip them. Point is, regardless of tactic, the child is forced to strip.

I'm sure that in TBS it's more mind fuckery as opposed to brute force, does that answer your question?

Edited: to remove needless who bait
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
i]Do something real, however, small. And don\'t-- don\'t diss the political things, but understand their limitations - Grace Lee Boggs[/i]
I do see the present and the future of our children as very dark. But I trust the people\'s capacity for reflection, rage, and rebellion - Oscar Olivera

Howto]

Offline Che Gookin

  • Global Moderator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 4241
  • Karma: +11/-3
    • View Profile
idea, inspired by over the gw. the grassroots effort thread.
« Reply #107 on: October 02, 2007, 03:35:11 AM »
By no means is refusal an easy route as the guest so aptly pointed out in his/her post. It far more effective than one might think it is. To suceed at it though you have to be willing to go the distance.

*They will use peer pressure.
*The will threaten you with consquences.
*They will use your parents against you.
*They will threaten you with a harsher programme.

This is just the beginning of the list. However, what most people forget is that the power of refusal works the best against not the staff, but the parents. Imagine the phone calls they are getting whilst you are parked on your butt somewhere ignoring everyone around you. The first few weeks of the programme are the ones where your parents are the weakest.

Exploit it to the fullest and set yourself free.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline try another castle

  • Registered Users
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2693
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
idea, inspired by over the gw. the grassroots effort thread.
« Reply #108 on: October 02, 2007, 04:04:29 AM »
Quote from: ""Wandering Waygookin""
By no means is refusal an easy route as the guest so aptly pointed out in his/her post. It far more effective than one might think it is. To suceed at it though you have to be willing to go the distance.

*They will use peer pressure.
*The will threaten you with consquences.
*They will use your parents against you.
*They will threaten you with a harsher programme.

This is just the beginning of the list. However, what most people forget is that the power of refusal works the best against not the staff, but the parents. Imagine the phone calls they are getting whilst you are parked on your butt somewhere ignoring everyone around you. The first few weeks of the programme are the ones where your parents are the weakest.

Exploit it to the fullest and set yourself free.



I like the idea, but I don't think any kid, no matter how firm their resolve, would have made it through a CEDU-style rap (which is the template for quite a few facilities) and remain silent, especially once they are onto your "game" and realize that you are playing the silent treatment. That kid would be dust in days. i'm not saying it's not doable, I'm saying that I think it would require a discipline not found in your usual teenager. Fuck, you'd have to  have at least some experience or belief in zen meditation.

Then, of course, because you aren't speaking up, they'll put you on some form of isolated physical labor. All day... every day... rain, snow, ice, heat... until you "get it" Maybe they will isolate you from the student body. You can't talk to any friends you may have made there. The pressure in raps/groups reaches boiling points to get you to talk. You are put on some sort of restriction where you can't leave your area, or smile, or hug, or sing. They take away your cigarettes, they put you in a jumpsuit while you work, or just keep you in a dog cage, (for the WWASPies who got the worst of the gulag treatment, IMO.)

The parents will be getting calls like "We had to put him on a work detail so he could learn a little bit more about himself..." or "He's very angry right now, but making great strides in therapy."

So... which is going to run out first? A teenager's resolve to remain uncomfortable, isolated and suffering (which, as a resister, is infinitely worse than a follower)? or... the mounds of bullshit a program will tell the parents about their child's progress (or lack thereof) to placate them and make them think they sent their kid to the right place?

Who is going to give out first?

Tick tock, Clarice, can you keep that lamb from screaming?

I carved on my arm and got on a restriction *AS* my parents were coming up to visit me. The staff headed them off in Sandpoint and told them flat out that they couldn't see me because I had gotten into trouble. What did my parents do? Those stupid fuckers actually turned around and went back home. I bet the staff even told them that I had carved on myself too. Wouldn't that make you concerned enough to come see your child? To the point where you would say "I don't care what you are telling me, I am seeing my kid right now." But no, they bought the line that it was in my best interest, and turned around, after traveling from completely the other side of the country and said "Welp, that was disappointing." And don't get me wrong, they *were* sad that they couldn't see me, but they were also *stupid*! It never occurred to them that they could simply call bullshit on advice which was being given to them by a facility that they were pumping thousands of dollars into every month.

In short... don't underestimate a troubled parent's stubbornness... or ignorance. It can outlast a teenager's any day, especially if there is money involved. Because of course, high price *must* equal high quality. If I'm paying this much, they must know better than I.


The way I see it, there are two choices.
1. Try to tough it out any way you know how until you "graduate" or your parents come to their senses and pull you.
2. Get the fuck out of there and hide out in a group home until you are 18.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Che Gookin

  • Global Moderator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 4241
  • Karma: +11/-3
    • View Profile
idea, inspired by over the gw. the grassroots effort thread.
« Reply #109 on: October 02, 2007, 09:28:34 AM »
More than being strong willed.. the kid has to know what to do in the first place. All of this speculation is pointless without the information getting into the hands of those who may end up as captives.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline BuzzKill

  • Posts: 1815
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
idea, inspired by over the gw. the grassroots effort thread.
« Reply #110 on: October 02, 2007, 08:19:32 PM »
Quote
In short... don't underestimate a troubled parent's stubbornness... or ignorance. It can outlast a teenager's any day, especially if there is money involved. Because of course, high price *must* equal high quality. If I'm paying this much, they must know better than I.


Absolutely right. But there is another factor that shouldn't be ignored or minimized - the brain washing of the parents. It is very real and very effective. Incredibly so.

I recently had a conversation with a couple program moms. It was a longish conversation, with plenty of program jargon being tossed out at me. (gave me the creepiest sorta flash backs) but there were a couple examples of their brainwashing that really stood out.

They tried to insist that their daughters were not coerced into attending the seminars. But of course they are - NO they say - they can opt out! One insisting: My daughter did opt out the first time! She went on to explain that if she opted out repeatedly, eventually she would be pulled with out attending. They would only keep her there 18 months or so - no longer.  

Does she know that? I asked
Of Course not! the mom exclaims.
So, I say; for all she knows, she is there for how ever long it takes to graduate. In fact, I am sure you've told her she is there until she graduates - haven't you? So, for all she knows, she has no choice but to attend the seminars if she ever wants out of there. That is coercion.  
No they both insist - they can opt out. . . and so it went.

The next example upset me far more.  We were discussing the inevitable "deadorinjail" issue.  That got thrown at me with some force - they'd both be deadorinjail with out the program. So, I tried to get them to acknowledge that death wasn't nearly as certain as they believed. They countered with their daughters had written them admitting they'd have been deadorinjail with out the program. But they've experienced the same thought reform you have, I tried to explain. I pointed out the general recklessness of the teen years and the thankfully low teen death statistics as some indication that their daughters were not nearly as sure to die as they had been conditioned to believe.

They then countered with how awful jail was - and jail was more a certainty.
OK - maybe - but they'd be safer in jail, I respond. This brought howls of protest.
What about the abuse? asked one.
What do you mean? I asked. What kind of abuse are you talking about, that you don't think happens every day in the programs?
Sexual! gets slammed at me, again, with some force.
You don't think that the kids are sexually assaulted in the programs? I asked. Your sadly most mistaken.
Who tells you this? they ask - the girls?!
Well yes - the kids do - who else. . .
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, they respond, And you Believe them?! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
(sick sinking feeling)
Yes I said, I do believe them. And I have to say, I hate to think you wouldn't. I hate to think, should your daughter muster up the courage to tell you she was a victim of sexual assault or harassment, that you would laugh in her face and send her back to her abuser.

The call was ended rather abruptly at that point. I did believe them, that they had an appointment to keep, but I was frustrated that the conversation ended there. I did offer to send them web links to further information but they declined the offer.

Now - the thing is - no clear thinking right minded person would respond the way those two women did.  They were parroting the program crap and pabulum, like all good program parents do. They can't help it. They have been conditioned to trust the program; and ignore their own common sense. They are conditioned to value their relationship with the program more than that of their child. This is why they will insist the program is a great success, even when their kid comes out far worse than when they went in.

No rational, free thinking adult, would spend tens of thousands of dollars to educate and rehab their sons and daughters, and call it a success when they come out and shoot themselves through the head - or end up living in a card board box - drinking and drugging and screwing everything in sight. This requires a well indoctrinated program parent. And they ALL insist the program was a success in the face of such dire situations. These two ladies were no exception.
 
I got the same ole parroting of the program spiel: The program gave them the tools - its up to them to use their tools. Its not the programs failure if they won't use the tools they were provided. What a crock of shit. No rational person can think this way.

And in a related but reveres situation: No clear headed. rational adult would call their son or daughter a looser who must be shunned; because they refused to "graduate" the program; in spite of the fact the son or daughter is living a very successful life by every possible measure! Yet, otherwise intelligent program parents, manage this mindless idiocy with little effort.

As I have tried to point out before: the parents are often also victims of this evil cult. Far less sympathetic victims - but victims none the less. Of course the program moms would be horrified to be called victims - b/c there is no such thing as a victim. Thinking like a victims is a weak minded response to having chosen to be robbed or raped or beat or sad or lonely or poor. . .

Another way the program keeps them (grads and parents) in line. They can't complain about being victimized, because they have been conditioned to hate and fear the "victim mind set".

The brainwashing is the key. If we could get the masses educated with regard to what mind control is - how and why it works - we could stop all these programs dead cold.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Nihilanthic

  • Posts: 3931
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
idea, inspired by over the gw. the grassroots effort thread.
« Reply #111 on: October 02, 2007, 08:46:43 PM »
Too bad society as a whole encourages this shit... the whole deferment to an authority or institution mentality that EVERYONE has in abundance.

People can't change a god damned light bulb in their car or change their oil.... and are told to 'consult an expert' in doing basically everything except boiling water, and I'm fairly soon THAT Will require certification to avoid being scalded!

Child care with 'expert consultation' is a natural extension of the whole "Unless I have a degree in it I can't do a god damned thing" mentality EVERYONE has, and it has at least a grain of truth to it. There are actual problems that can be resolved with the help of an expert such as learning disabilities, ACTUAL developmental delays, physical therapy, and therapy for past trauma, but that can often be twisted and used as a case in point when someone makes up a problem your child has and says they need expert help with it and for that matter to be kept in an institution because they are not 'safe' otherwise.

The lies start with the edcon and continue through the industry. All the edcon is doing is seeing a good scam for what it is and aping the same crap that makes people spend $8 a pop to have a damned light bulb put in or $20 to have someone change your oil and lie to you about what kind they really put in  :roll:

Why WOULDN'T the service industry try to fuck with your kids? They've got your car, your computer, your house, your finances, your child's ACTUAL problems... why not make some up?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
DannyB on the internet:I CALLED A LAWYER TODAY TO SEE IF I COULD SUE YOUR ASSES FOR DOING THIS BUT THAT WAS NOT POSSIBLE.

CCMGirl on program restraints: "DON\'T TAZ ME BRO!!!!!"

TheWho on program survivors: "From where I sit I see all the anit-program[sic] people doing all the complaining and crying."

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
idea, inspired by over the gw. the grassroots effort thread.
« Reply #112 on: October 02, 2007, 09:22:26 PM »
Quote
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 12:42 pm    Post subject:    

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

Well, on these point made above, we simply disagree. I feel what Trud and Butcher Said was offensive - never mind the extreme off color nature of their tag. I'm sure it was intended to offended me and give you the giggles. It worked.

Its not that I don't understand how you folks view the situation, but I feel I have a more well rounded view (I actually know the man) and so see things differently.
To answer your question Ginger, No- he does not loose control when a kid cusses or farts. Nate enjoyed his company and often had a blast on the trips they took. Knowing my son, I am sure he occasionally cursed and farted, among other things. Craig is actually very understanding and patient with the kids. Often less so with the parents. He has got a gift for working with drug addled kids. They seem to be able to relate to him and open up to him in a way that is remarkable. Nate and the boys who were in ALA with him seem to look upon Craig as a good and trusted confidant and friend. They don't always take his advice; frequently not; but I think they are well aware its good advice and that he has their best interest at heart.
So - that's my take on the subject of Craig. I've often before explained what I know and think about ALA. I have nothing to add and realize you guys disagree.  


Buzzkill, in your post above, you seem to support Craig Rogers and Abundant Life Academy where you placed your son in his second program.  Is this still your position today? Do you still feel that Craig Rogers was "a good and trusted confidant and friend" to your son and the other students?  Do you still feel that Craig had "their best interest at heart?" Or, was this the type of "parental brainwashing" that you are speaking of?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline try another castle

  • Registered Users
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2693
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
idea, inspired by over the gw. the grassroots effort thread.
« Reply #113 on: October 02, 2007, 11:32:02 PM »
Quote
More than being strong willed.. the kid has to know what to do in the first place. All of this speculation is pointless without the information getting into the hands of those who may end up as captives.

Definitely agreed. A countrywide high-school education course would be ideal. "What to do if your parents send you to a cult."

I'm kinda half-joking and half-serious about it. The joking part comes from thinking that something like that could ever happen, the serious part thinking that it would be nice if it could.

The ideal, of course, being that these places didn't exist in the first place.

Quote
Another way the program keeps them (grads and parents) in line. They can't complain about being victimized, because they have been conditioned to hate and fear the "victim mind set".



****shivers**** oooohh... kay.... never made that connection before.  :o  yeeek! fuckin' a.


And to the anon above... I assume you are simply here for baiting purposes, since any literate moron with eyesight can see that that post is from 2005.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline BuzzKill

  • Posts: 1815
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
idea, inspired by over the gw. the grassroots effort thread.
« Reply #114 on: October 03, 2007, 12:41:53 AM »
You wanna talk about ALA?  OK - Well, Yes, it was awhile back now. No - that was not any kind of parental brainwashing. How could it have been? There was simply no opportunity for such a thing to occur.

Honestly, If you would educate yourself with regard to what brainwashing is, you wouldn't be asking. There was nothing about our ALA experience that even comes close to brain washing. There was nothing coercive or secretive or exploitive about it.

Not to be an apologist for ALA - but to this day, I've yet to hear that my son was in any way treated badly while there. I think I would have, had such been the case.  I have proven my willingness to listen and believe what he has to say. I think he would tell me. If he were miss treated - or if he reported any kid being miss-treated - I assure you I would be just as angry about it, as I have been about other situations. Probably more so.

I have no serious complaints.

If I did, surely I have proven my willingness to say so.

That having been said - I am really not interested in being the ALA spokesperson on Fornits. I have no idea what it is like today, and don't want to speculate.  

Coincidentally - Nate just popped in. He left with my copy of Cults in Our Midst. He thinks his girl friend will like it. I told him to be sure to read the chapter about cults in the work place. Its about LGAT - brainwashing large groups of people in a series of daily seminars.
Sound familiar? One of the Program traits totally lacking at ALA. But, should he read the book, and decide ALA was also an abusive, brainwashing cult, I'll let you know.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
idea, inspired by over the gw. the grassroots effort thread.
« Reply #115 on: October 03, 2007, 01:03:03 AM »
It almost as if the two program parents believe in the benefits and philosophy their children's programs as strongly as buzzkill believes in ALA. Why label these two parents as "brainwashed?"
It almost sounds as if the other two parents may have had their children in a WWASP program so, they MUST be "brainwashed!"
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
idea, inspired by over the gw. the grassroots effort thread.
« Reply #116 on: October 03, 2007, 01:21:13 AM »
Quote from: ""try another castle""
Quote from: ""Wandering Waygookin""
By no means is refusal an easy route as the guest so aptly pointed out in his/her post. It far more effective than one might think it is. To suceed at it though you have to be willing to go the distance.

*They will use peer pressure.
*The will threaten you with consquences.
*They will use your parents against you.
*They will threaten you with a harsher programme.

This is just the beginning of the list. However, what most people forget is that the power of refusal works the best against not the staff, but the parents. Imagine the phone calls they are getting whilst you are parked on your butt somewhere ignoring everyone around you. The first few weeks of the programme are the ones where your parents are the weakest.

Exploit it to the fullest and set yourself free.


I like the idea, but I don't think any kid, no matter how firm their resolve, would have made it through a CEDU-style rap (which is the template for quite a few facilities) and remain silent, especially once they are onto your "game" and realize that you are playing the silent treatment. That kid would be dust in days. i'm not saying it's not doable, I'm saying that I think it would require a discipline not found in your usual teenager. Fuck, you'd have to  have at least some experience or belief in zen meditation.

Then, of course, because you aren't speaking up, they'll put you on some form of isolated physical labor. All day... every day... rain, snow, ice, heat... until you "get it" Maybe they will isolate you from the student body. You can't talk to any friends you may have made there. The pressure in raps/groups reaches boiling points to get you to talk. You are put on some sort of restriction where you can't leave your area, or smile, or hug, or sing. They take away your cigarettes, they put you in a jumpsuit while you work, or just keep you in a dog cage, (for the WWASPies who got the worst of the gulag treatment, IMO.)

The parents will be getting calls like "We had to put him on a work detail so he could learn a little bit more about himself..." or "He's very angry right now, but making great strides in therapy."

So... which is going to run out first? A teenager's resolve to remain uncomfortable, isolated and suffering (which, as a resister, is infinitely worse than a follower)? or... the mounds of bullshit a program will tell the parents about their child's progress (or lack thereof) to placate them and make them think they sent their kid to the right place?

Who is going to give out first?

Tick tock, Clarice, can you keep that lamb from screaming?

I carved on my arm and got on a restriction *AS* my parents were coming up to visit me. The staff headed them off in Sandpoint and told them flat out that they couldn't see me because I had gotten into trouble. What did my parents do? Those stupid fuckers actually turned around and went back home. I bet the staff even told them that I had carved on myself too. Wouldn't that make you concerned enough to come see your child? To the point where you would say "I don't care what you are telling me, I am seeing my kid right now." But no, they bought the line that it was in my best interest, and turned around, after traveling from completely the other side of the country and said "Welp, that was disappointing." And don't get me wrong, they *were* sad that they couldn't see me, but they were also *stupid*! It never occurred to them that they could simply call bullshit on advice which was being given to them by a facility that they were pumping thousands of dollars into every month.

In short... don't underestimate a troubled parent's stubbornness... or ignorance. It can outlast a teenager's any day, especially if there is money involved. Because of course, high price *must* equal high quality. If I'm paying this much, they must know better than I.


The way I see it, there are two choices.
1. Try to tough it out any way you know how until you "graduate" or your parents come to their senses and pull you.
2. Get the fuck out of there and hide out in a group home until you are 18.



I agree with this. But what program allows cigarettes, that is hard to imagine?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline try another castle

  • Registered Users
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2693
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
idea, inspired by over the gw. the grassroots effort thread.
« Reply #117 on: October 03, 2007, 01:25:00 AM »
Quote
I agree with this. But what program allows cigarettes, that is hard to imagine?



Well, that example was from a program during the mid 80s.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Che Gookin

  • Global Moderator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 4241
  • Karma: +11/-3
    • View Profile
idea, inspired by over the gw. the grassroots effort thread.
« Reply #118 on: October 03, 2007, 03:08:13 AM »
I think in the case of Buzzkill and her boy Nate it is a case of going from worst to not so bad. Anything after a wwasp programme has been claimed to be not so bad. Took quite sometime for people to recognize that not so bad still isn't at all acceptable.

Ask Sue Scheff about that sort of thing.. she panders the very same line and apparently has made some decent money off of it.

Is Buzzkill brainwashed? Well I'm hardly an expert on it and it seems to me she is saying it how she perceived it. I still question the clarity of her perception after having a son in a wwasp programme though.


Brainwashed... probably not...

Questionable in her objectivity regarding ALA and Craig Rogers?

More than likely.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
idea, inspired by over the gw. the grassroots effort thread.
« Reply #119 on: October 03, 2007, 05:06:34 AM »
Quote from: ""try another castle""
Quote
I agree with this. But what program allows cigarettes, that is hard to imagine?


Well, that example was from a program during the mid 80s.


Although programs are mostly intended for teens, there are some that take young adults over 18. There is at least one I can think of that allows smoking, but only for those over 18 -- basically because that's the law.

Not that being able to smoke cigs is any consolation if you're stuck in a program...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »