Thank you for clearing that up, Bob. So you finally looked at what happened to her and realize she doesnt fit my data set of TBS's.
Oh Cindy I've known all along she doesn't fit into
your data set. I simply don't care. I've made this point clear to you on several occasions, you just still somehow just can't grasp it. Your data is nonsense, you purposely exclude data because you know it proves your point wrong. No one looking for objective or honest information is going to pay any attention to what youre presenting Cindy.
We were all wondering where the heck you were going with all this....
There's that "we" again. Who exactly is "we" Cindy? I realize youve got a whole phonebooks worth of people in your head right now but are any of the people you include as "we" actually real?
If you are including kids who died in the private homes of nurses during attachment therapy the readers of the data need to know that
There's that spin again Cindy. It's sad that you feel you have to do that just to try and prove your point. The girl died in the home of an employee of a theraputic institute. A theraputic institute that was contacted for services to be rendered. The location of where the girl died makes no difference, she was still in the PTS. Your attempting to paint it otherwise accomplishes nothing, people can see the truth for themselves, but if it makes you feel better spin away.
If they are seeking attachment therapy this is very important...if they are seeking a wilderness or TBS it doesnt help them at all and only serves to muddy the data.
And if they are seeking all the pertinant information concerning options for their troubled teens than your information is useless!
