Author Topic: Carlbrook  (Read 701131 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Carlbrook
« Reply #165 on: January 15, 2006, 09:17:00 PM »
"Carlbrook actually has representatives go out to the wilderness site and pick the student up and brings them to the boardingschool/whatever. They never leave the kid alone. This is considered safe. The parents agree to this too. Sounds kinda prisonesque if you ask me."

That is incorrect. The parents either can bring the kid to Carlbrook themselves or use escorts.  Carlbrook has no transport personnel.

No restraints are used at the school.  The academics are pretty good. The kids tend to do well academically post-Carlbrook.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline try another castle

  • Registered Users
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2693
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Carlbrook
« Reply #166 on: January 15, 2006, 10:03:00 PM »
Quote
On 2006-01-15 18:17:00, Anonymous wrote:

""Carlbrook actually has representatives go out to the wilderness site and pick the student up and brings them to the boardingschool/whatever. They never leave the kid alone. This is considered safe. The parents agree to this too. Sounds kinda prisonesque if you ask me."



That is incorrect. The parents either can bring the kid to Carlbrook themselves or use escorts.  Carlbrook has no transport personnel.



No restraints are used at the school.  The academics are pretty good. The kids tend to do well academically post-Carlbrook."


Jesus, you know, I am so sick of this same person pimping Carlbrook. Did the staff send you here for damage control or what?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Carlbrook
« Reply #167 on: January 16, 2006, 12:02:00 PM »
Quote
On 2006-01-15 18:17:00, Anonymous wrote:

""Carlbrook actually has representatives go out to the wilderness site and pick the student up and brings them to the boardingschool/whatever. They never leave the kid alone. This is considered safe. The parents agree to this too. Sounds kinda prisonesque if you ask me."



That is incorrect. The parents either can bring the kid to Carlbrook themselves or use escorts.  Carlbrook has no transport personnel.



No restraints are used at the school.  The academics are pretty good. The kids tend to do well academically post-Carlbrook."


This is totally untrue.  They definitely, absolutely use restraints.  This person must not have ever spent a day on campus because the slammings are everyday there.  Just ask any kid who went there.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Carlbrook
« Reply #168 on: January 16, 2006, 12:54:00 PM »
I went there- they do not use restraints.   An out of control kid might be bear-hugged, but if a kid is too physical, they can't stay at the school.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Carlbrook
« Reply #169 on: January 16, 2006, 02:51:00 PM »
Quote
On 2006-01-16 09:54:00, Anonymous wrote:

"I went there- they do not use restraints.   An out of control kid might be bear-hugged, but if a kid is too physical, they can't stay at the school."

 
Thank you for validating the point, Carlbrook student.

What you call a "bear hug" is what the state calls "physical restraint."

So, there you have it, straight from yet another kid's mouth.  Carlbrook uses physical restraint.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline try another castle

  • Registered Users
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2693
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Carlbrook
« Reply #170 on: January 16, 2006, 03:35:00 PM »
Quote
On 2006-01-16 09:54:00, Anonymous wrote:

"I went there- they do not use restraints.   An out of control kid might be bear-hugged, but if a kid is too physical, they can't stay at the school."


Dude, just give it up. We know you're a rep of the school who has been littering our boards with the same old bullshit, trying to pretend you are satisfied parents, happy alumni, etc. It's so obvious it's not even funny.

Tell Tim I said hi, and that I think he's an unqualified fucked-up tweaker freak who should never be around children or teens.

Seriously, that guy acted like he was on Tina all the time.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Carlbrook
« Reply #171 on: January 16, 2006, 04:21:00 PM »
I agree.  This is the same troll.  As soon as it was said "ask any student..." within an hour this lame-ass was back posing as a student.

It is really pathetic the level that these folks will stoop to.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Carlbrook
« Reply #172 on: January 16, 2006, 04:29:00 PM »
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline AtomicAnt

  • Posts: 552
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Carlbrook
« Reply #173 on: January 16, 2006, 05:31:00 PM »
Quote
On 2006-01-16 09:54:00, Anonymous wrote:

"I went there- they do not use restraints.   An out of control kid might be bear-hugged, but if a kid is too physical, they can't stay at the school."


Bear-hugs my ass. I'll laugh as I watched the kid break the jerk's nose with his head and if the jerk still didn't let go, he would be kneecapped. Of course, then the kid is too violent and cannot stay. Yeah right. If it were that easy to get expelled, these places would be empty.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Nihilanthic

  • Posts: 3931
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Carlbrook
« Reply #174 on: January 16, 2006, 07:08:00 PM »
Quote
On 2006-01-16 14:31:00, AtomicAnt wrote:

"
Quote

On 2006-01-16 09:54:00, Anonymous wrote:


"I went there- they do not use restraints.   An out of control kid might be bear-hugged, but if a kid is too physical, they can't stay at the school."




Bear-hugs my ass. I'll laugh as I watched the kid break the jerk's nose with his head and if the jerk still didn't let go, he would be kneecapped. Of course, then the kid is too violent and cannot stay. Yeah right. If it were that easy to get expelled, these places would be empty."


http://www.gracie.com/  :grin:

It sucks when decent, hardworking people get screwed over like that. Because that means pricks like us don?t stand a chance.
 


http://www.moderndrunkardmagazine.com' target='_new'>Jim S. watching the devastation of the recent tsunami on the television at JR?s

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
DannyB on the internet:I CALLED A LAWYER TODAY TO SEE IF I COULD SUE YOUR ASSES FOR DOING THIS BUT THAT WAS NOT POSSIBLE.

CCMGirl on program restraints: "DON\'T TAZ ME BRO!!!!!"

TheWho on program survivors: "From where I sit I see all the anit-program[sic] people doing all the complaining and crying."

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Carlbrook
« Reply #175 on: January 17, 2006, 08:29:00 AM »
Um, unfortunately it is quite easy for a kid to get expelled from Carlbrook.  My kid was not quite "with the program."  They were good about trying to explain expectations to him, but he was stubborn.  They never used any force or restraint.  We got a phone call and were asked to pick him up within a very few days.  He still credits his progress to Carlbrook, and getting kicked out was a nasty wake-up call.  He was devastated, and still keeps in touch with friends he made there.  He's out of high school now, working full-time and is doing well.  I think we have a troll stirring things up here.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Carlbrook
« Reply #176 on: January 17, 2006, 08:43:00 AM »
In just a 'few days'... Carlbrook made a life-changing impact and your 'son' still keeps in touch with people he made deep connections with in a few days.
And a parent who had involvement for a 'few days' is posting on fornits?
Amazingly unbelievable.
Your ficticious stories are boring and unrealistic.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Carlbrook
« Reply #177 on: January 17, 2006, 11:34:00 AM »
"In just a 'few days'."-   The kid was at Carlbrook more than a few days.  He needed to be PICKED UP within a few days of the parent getting the call.

Another example of brilliant interpretation on this board.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Carlbrook
« Reply #178 on: January 17, 2006, 09:57:00 PM »
Thanks for the correct interpretation.  Kid was at Carlbrook for a while.  And according to the poster above, Second Nature wilderness and Carlbrook were just figments of my imagination??? Damn, then where did all the money go?  Sorry I tell such boring stories.  The rest of the world knows for sure that I'm NOT a fiction writer.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Nihilanthic

  • Posts: 3931
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Carlbrook
« Reply #179 on: January 17, 2006, 11:43:00 PM »
Quote
On 2006-01-17 18:57:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Thanks for the correct interpretation.  Kid was at Carlbrook for a while.  And according to the poster above, Second Nature wilderness and Carlbrook were just figments of my imagination??? Damn, then where did all the money go?  Sorry I tell such boring stories.  The rest of the world knows for sure that I'm NOT a fiction writer.  "


Really? Got some proof to back up your story there mr Carlbrookie?

After all, who wouldn't prefer Middle Earth, unless they've been corrupted by a Ring of Power?

http://www.lewrockwell.com/elkins/elkins73.html' target='_new'>Jeff Elkins; Tolkien's Libertarian Vision

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
DannyB on the internet:I CALLED A LAWYER TODAY TO SEE IF I COULD SUE YOUR ASSES FOR DOING THIS BUT THAT WAS NOT POSSIBLE.

CCMGirl on program restraints: "DON\'T TAZ ME BRO!!!!!"

TheWho on program survivors: "From where I sit I see all the anit-program[sic] people doing all the complaining and crying."