I know little of this story, but a quick perusal of it indicates the following. The Website claims this..". What are clearly rock carvings with distinctly Egyptian hieroglyphs on them have been discovered in several areas of the Grand Canyon."
Smithsonian comments..."In 1998 ...: "We know of no credible evidence that supports the discovery of ancient Egyptian artifacts or hieroglyphs anywhere in the Americas."
And of the picture of the "hieroglyphs ...
Richard Pulley wrote us about this object with a great explanation:
"Here's a quick comment regarding your trip to the Grand Canyon, xploring for the lost city. I'd read of this before, and it's great to see someone checking this out. However, you might want to reconsider the interpretations for some of your captioned photos. Photo #9 ("As we wandered the high walls...")and photo #10 ("A closer examination...") both portray fossils of naturally occurring animals, not human artifacts. The spiral and the pin are each a different type of cephalapod, a distant living relative of which is the chambered nautilus. As a geologist, I can say this with confidence from just a viewing of the posted phots. Please note that this says nothing about the city at all, one way or the other. The appropriate formations of the Grand Canyon are full of these fossils, and would be no matter whether or not an 'ancient' city happens to be co-located there."
In other words, it appears people not trained in archeology are interpreting things in a manner that is not consistent with facts. No surprise here...some people are always jumping to superfantastical conclusions about things they don't understand. A more reasoned approach is in order.