All I am saying is this kids was only there a few days and he was able to get a letter out to his parents without it being censored. This goes counter to what many people say here.
Its a good thing, Anne. If more programs can open up communication like this program does then it will be good for everyone.
But you insist on putting the spin on it that there's been any substantive improvement when there hasn't. So the kid is able to get a letter out.....doesn't do much good when the program has already conditioned the parents to not believe their kids when they say they're being abused.
It's your same old shitspin.
It may be a total shitpit as you call them. But we can disband the thought that these places interrupt communication between parent and child.
No, "we" can't. (Just stop it already.....so many of us have asked you to stop that. You'd think you might at least just honor that one simple request....call it a gesture of good will)
You might be able to, but most sane people can't because we know it's not true.
Here is an example of a child who wrote a letter home to his parents within a few days of arriving and it went out uncensored.
And the program staff felt comfortable with it because they knew the parents had been sufficiently conditioned to not believe their own child. The end results are the same.
So we know that if someone says they all their outgoing mail was read and torn up if it said anything bad we can site an example that this does not hold true for todays programs.
No, "we" can't.
You might be able to hold this
one example up of this
one program, but again......it still didn't make any real difference when the program had already conditioned the parents to not believe their own child.
They may be total shitpits but the kids are allowed to communicate freely with their family at home.
No, they're not. Free communication would mean that the programs wouldn't condition the parents to not believe their kids cries for help.