There are at least hundreds of various types of treatment programs out there, fornits tends to focus on about a dozen or so. Fornits seems to ignores the rest of them, and tries to generalize an entire industry based on the worst case examples. So coming up with a list of good programs would be a very long list, indeed. I've been to good treatment programs, I was not abused or mistreated. But the real question is how the posters here can prove that all programs are abusive, just because an individual person had a negative experience doesn't mean everybody else did. Fornits only has a relatively small amount of posters compared to the number who attended programs. Most kids go through it and do fine, the one's who don't end up here complaining about it, which isn't very many.
So the real question isn't about naming good programs, that is easy, because it's almost all of them. But I'll wait here for the people claiming all programs are abusive to come up with some kind of proof of that statement. There are a lot of programs open right now with kids in them and nobody here on fornits ever heard of, and I'm not going to start naming names of these programs so the extremists here can start stalking the staff at them, or hacking their websites and all the things fornits extremists like to do. Programs work and parents continue to use them, despite fornits posters complaining about them on this forum. Arguing with me or anyone else here isn't going to stop a parent from using a program. If you want to do something about it you probably should do something other than demanding proof that programs are good, and start coming up with your own proof why programs are bad. Otherwise you're just wasting your time, because a sob story about how you couldn't make it through a program isn't really that convincing to most parents.