Author Topic: Green River Boys Camp KENTUCKY  (Read 13509 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Green River Boys Camp KENTUCKY
« on: March 25, 2006, 01:16:00 PM »
Anybody know anything about this place?

And, while we're at it, Bluegrass Treatment Center, Cardinal Treatment Center, Central Kentucky Treatment Center, Green River Boys' Camp, Johnson-Breckinridge Treatment Center, Lake Cumberland Boys' Camp, Lincoln Village Treatment Center, Mayfield Boys' Treatment Center, Morehead Treatment Center, Northern Kentucky Treatment Center, Owensboro Treatment Center, KCH Rice-Audubon Treatment Center, and Woodsbend Boys' Camp.

Quote
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, et al., Defendants

CONSENT DECREE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION 3

II. DEFINITIONS 4

III. BACKGROUND 6

IV. SUBSTANTIVE PROVISIONS 8

A. Protection From Abuse, Mistreatment, and Injury 8

B. Treatment Services 14

C. Education & Vocational Training & Structured Activities 16

(1) General Population 17

(2) Juveniles with Disabilities 17

(3) Structured Activities 19

D. Aftercare Treatment Services 20

E. Time-Out and Isolation 21

F. Staffing, Operational, and Security Procedures 24

G. Medical Care 27

H. Mental Health Care 30

I. Classification 35

J. Fire Safety 36

K. Bedspace and Overcrowding 37

L. Maintenance and Sanitation 37

V. TREATMENT CENTER CONSTRUCTION AND/OR RENOVATION 37

VI. CONSTRUCTION, IMPLEMENTATION, AND TIMING OF COMPLIANCE 38

VII. APPENDICES 44

I. INTRODUCTION

1. The United States enters into this agreement pursuant to its authority under the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act ("CRIPA"), 42 U.S.C. § 1997 et seq., and the provisions of Pub. L. No. 103-322, 108 Stat. 2071 (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 14141) concerning the administration of juvenile justice.

2. The overall purpose of the parties in entering into this Consent Decree is to achieve the outcomes delineated below, and the Decree shall be read and interpreted in light of these outcomes:

a. Juveniles confined in Kentucky treatment centers have a right to treatment reasonably calculated to improve their condition and promote their personal growth and development. Such treatment involves a continuum of services provided in the community and institutional settings;

b. Every juvenile committed to the custody of the Defendants has a right to receive individualized and appropriate care and treatment that is safe and humane and is provided in the least restrictive setting consistent with the juvenile's needs; c. Defendants shall utilize their community based juvenile services to the maximum extent feasible.

3. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1345.

4. Venue in the Western District of Kentucky is appropriate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).

5. The United States has met all pre-filing requirements stated in the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997 et seq.

II. DEFINITIONS

6. "Plaintiff" shall refer to the United States of America.

7. "Defendants" shall refer to the Commonwealth of Kentucky; Governor Brereton C. Jones, in his official capacity; Masten Childers II, Secretary of the Kentucky Cabinet for Human Resources ("CHR"), in his official capacity; Peggy Wallace, the Commissioner of the Department for Social Services, in her official capacity; Betty Shipp, the Director of Youth Services, in her official capacity; Elizabeth Wachtel, the Commissioner for Mental Health and Mental Retardation, in her official capacity; and the agents and successors in office of the above listed individuals and offices.

8. The terms "juvenile" or "juveniles" shall refer to one or more individuals sentenced to, incarcerated in, detained at, or otherwise confined at any residential treatment facility operated or funded by the Commonwealth of Kentucky, including the Central Kentucky Treatment Center ("CKTC").

9. The term "juvenile treatment facility", "juvenile treatment center" or "residential treatment center" shall refer to any residential facility of more than eight beds presently or in the future during the operation of this Consent Decree, owned, operated, or funded by the Commonwealth of Kentucky that incarcerates, detains, or otherwise confines juveniles for the purpose of providing treatment services, including education and counseling services. At a minimum, this term shall include the following treatment centers: Bluegrass Treatment Center, Cardinal Treatment Center, Central Kentucky Treatment Center, Green River Boys' Camp, Johnson-Breckinridge Treatment Center, Lake Cumberland Boys' Camp, Lincoln Village Treatment Center, Mayfield Boys' Treatment Center, Morehead Treatment Center, Northern Kentucky Treatment Center, Owensboro Treatment Center, KCH Rice-Audubon Treatment Center, and Woodsbend Boys' Camp. This definition does not include short term pre-adjudication detention facilities.

10. The term "special needs juvenile" shall refer to those juveniles who are suicidal, mentally ill, mentally retarded, emotionally disturbed, under the influence of alcohol or other substances, or a danger to themselves or others.

11. The term "isolation" shall mean any placement of a juvenile in a room without normal staff and peer interaction for a period of one hour or more.

12. The term "time-out" is defined as any placement of a juvenile in a room without normal staff and peer interaction for less than one hour.

13. The term "competency-based" training shall mean that staff shall demonstrate to his or her supervisor and/or trainer his or her ability or competency to perform a specified skill through an active hands-on demonstration of such skill.

14. The term Qualified Mental Health Professional ("QMHP") shall be defined by Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 202A.011(12) (Supp. 1994) attached to this Consent Decree as Appendix A. The above definition of QMHP shall govern this term for the duration of this Consent Decree regardless of any statutory amendments to Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 202A.011(12) by the Commonwealth.

III. BACKGROUND

15. The Defendant Commonwealth of Kentucky owns and funds the operation of the Commonwealth's juvenile residential treatment facilities.

16. In their official capacity, the Defendants Secretary of the Cabinet for Human Resources, the Commissioner of the Department for Social Services, and the Director of Youth Services are responsible for the day-to-day operation of various Kentucky residential treatment facilities. Defendant Elizabeth Wachtel, the Commissioner for Mental Health and Mental Retardation, is responsible for providing mental health services to juveniles in the various Kentucky residential treatment facilities.

17. On February 9, 1995, and May 1, 1995, the United States notified Governor Jones and other Kentucky officials of the United States' intent to investigate various Kentucky juvenile treatment centers for the Commonwealth of Kentucky pursuant to the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act ("CRIPA"), 42 U.S.C. § 1997 et seq., and the provisions of Pub. L. No. 103-322, 108 Stat. 2071 (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 14141) concerning the administration of juvenile justice. The United States toured the Owensboro Treatment Center and Green River Boys Camp with expert consultants on April 26-28, 1995. The United States toured the Johnson-Breckinridge Treatment Center, Rice-Audubon Treatment Center and Central Kentucky Treatment Center with expert consultants on May 9-13, 1995. On July 28, 1995, the United States issued a findings letter based on the tour of its experts and found that conditions in Kentucky juvenile treatment centers violated the constitutional and federal statutory rights of the juveniles.

18. On July 28, 1995, Kentucky responded to the United States' findings in a letter from Secretary Masten Childers to Assistant Attorney General Deval Patrick. In that letter, Kentucky expressed its intent to promptly address the United States' findings. From that date to the present, Kentucky has worked cooperatively with the United States to remedy the conditions detailed in the findings letter. At the date of the signing of this Consent Decree, Kentucky has begun implementing a number of this Consent Decree's requirements.

19. The parties to this Decree recognize the constitutional and federal statutory rights of juveniles confined in Kentucky's juvenile treatment centers. After discussions and in order to avoid litigation concerning the constitutionality of the care and confinement of juveniles and of the actions of officials and employees of Kentucky at its juvenile treatment centers, the parties agree to the provisions set forth in this Consent Decree.

IV. SUBSTANTIVE PROVISIONS

A. Protection From Abuse, Mistreatment, and Injury

20. Defendants shall adequately protect the juveniles within Kentucky residential treatment centers from harm, abuse, neglect, exploitation and/or other mistreatment, including physical, verbal, and/or psychological mistreatment. In order to adequately protect the juveniles, Defendants shall implement the provisions contained in ¶¶ 20-34.

21. Defendants shall institute an adequate uniform special incident reporting system that ensures that all special incidents are promptly and adequately identified, reported, investigated and tracked. Defendants shall ensure that the definition of what constitutes a special incident is clear, objective, unambiguous, and easily understood by juveniles and staff of the juvenile treatment centers. The definition of a special incident shall include all alleged incidents of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation and/or injury. The special incident reporting system shall consist of the following components:

a. Defendants shall create a factfinding investigative unit outside the Department of Social Services or any department or agency given supervising authority over juvenile treatment facilities and/or staff. The investigative unit shall report to the Juvenile Services Review Board created under ¶ 21(b) and shall be responsible for factfinding only. The investigative unit shall have sufficient staff to adequately perform its duties;

b. Defendants shall create a Juvenile Services Review Board responsible for evaluating investigative reports submitted to them by the factfinding external investigative unit, determining whether the facts substantiate a finding of abuse, neglect, mistreatment and/or exploitation, and suggesting appropriate disciplinary action;

c. Defendants shall create a quality assurance management unit composed of persons outside the Department of Social Services to check the quality, efficacy, and promptness of special incident investigations.

22. The factfinding investigative unit shall have the following specific responsibilities:

a. Investigate in a timely manner all allegations of special incidents and prepare a written report of the investigation and its findings, specifying the occurrences surrounding the special incident and whether or not the perpetrator has been identified;

b. Prepare and provide a report in a timely manner and in writing to the Inspector General of Kentucky, the Juvenile Services Review Board, and place the Department of Social Services on notice of all special incident investigations;

c. Track the time, location, and staff present for all special incidents. The investigator will analyze this information for trends and when trends emerge, report such information to the Juvenile Services Review Board and the Director of Youth Services;

d. Assist in training all staff on reporting allegations of special incidents and on preserving evidence.

23. The members of the factfinding investigative unit shall receive adequate training in conducting investigations in institutions serving juveniles, including classroom and field training.

24. Any member of an investigative unit shall have the authority to immediately investigate any suspected special incidents whether or not a formal complaint has been filed.

25. The Juvenile Services Review Board shall be composed of sufficient numbers of persons to ensure the attendance of at least five members at all meetings, the majority of whom shall not be employed by Kentucky. One of the Board members shall be a member of the Department of Public Advocacy, Protection and Advocacy Division.

26. Defendants shall develop and implement, or ensure that the quality assurance management unit develops and implements, a reliable protocol for checking the quality of all special incident investigations. The quality assurance protocol shall ensure that a reliable sample of special incident investigations are reviewed, including investigations found by the Juvenile Services Review Board to be "unsubstantiated" or "unfounded". The quality assurance management unit shall make periodic and unannounced external monitoring visits of juvenile treatment facilities and programs.

27. The Defendants and any state agency or Department with current and/or future oversight or involvement with juvenile treatment centers and all juvenile treatment centers shall develop and implement adequate policies and procedures that detail how to adequately recognize special incidents, promptly report such incidents to appropriate protective and investigative service agencies, promptly take effective action to protect the juvenile, implement appropriate disciplinary action, and adequately track special incidents in an effective, comprehensive manner. Such policies and procedures shall include the following:

a. Policies and procedures shall detail the specific requirements of each staff and non-staff member in reporting, investigating and tracking special incidents and shall offer step by step instructions that delineate clearly individual staff member responsibility for reporting potential abuse;

b. Reporting of special incidents shall be mandatory on all facility staff and non-staff members such as medical contractors and/or teachers and shall occur at the time the special incident is witnessed or discovered;

c. Defendants shall identify high-risk situations of abuse and mistreatment and train staff and non-staff members in how to recognize and handle such high risk situations of abuse and mistreatment;

d. All staff and juveniles shall have easy and quick access to any investigative agency;

e. Staff shall be adequately trained concerning their responsibilities for preventing, recognizing, reporting and responding to abuse and shall sign a statement to that effect; f. Juveniles shall be adequately informed as to the procedures for reporting alleged special incidents and shall have access to an investigative agency outside the facility for the purpose of reporting alleged special incidents without facility staff intervention or involvement;

g. Staff at the treatment center shall not be involved in reporting of special incidents by juveniles. Juveniles shall have access to someone outside the facility in a timely fashion without having to contact staff or fill in forms ultimately mailed by staff;

h. Defendants shall institute a priority system that adequately identifies special incidents from other incidents to facilitate the prompt investigation of all special incidents;

i. Defendants shall institute adequate policies and procedures for disciplining staff for abuse and mistreatment of juveniles. Such policies and procedures shall include clear and adequate punishments for demonstrated incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation and/or mistreatment.

28. Defendants shall ensure that reporters of suspected and known special incidents are protected from retaliation and shall inform staff and juveniles of their right to be free from retaliation.

29. Defendants shall take prompt administrative action in response to allegations of abuse and mistreatment and shall vigorously pursue actions before the Kentucky Personnel Board.

30. To the maximum extent possible as permitted by the Commonwealth's regulations governing personnel practices, Defendants shall institute personnel practices that protect juveniles in the treatment centers from continued contact with alleged perpetrators of abuse and mistreatment, especially during investigation and review of the alleged special incidents.

31. If the Kentucky Personnel Board rejects Defendants' disciplinary action for dismissal arising from abuse allegations against one of its employees, Defendants shall take all possible action to avoid placing such staff member back into any position involving direct contact with juveniles pending any review and/or appeal.

32. Defendants shall refer all alleged or suspected crimes against juveniles by staff to outside authorities for investigation. In doing so, Defendants shall not transfer or diminish its responsibility to promptly investigate and adequately discipline staff for incidents of abuse and mistreatment. Responsibility for prompt and adequate investigation and resolution of special incidents lies with the Defendants and may not be shifted to outside law enforcement agencies.

33. In no event shall Defendants use mace or other chemical agents on the juveniles.

34. Defendants shall abide by Administrative Order HR 95-122 signed by Masten Childers II, the Secretary for Human Resources on October 24, 1995, and incorporated into this Consent Decree as Appendix B, to the extent such order applies to the Commonwealth's juvenile residential treatment centers.

B. Treatment Services

35. All juveniles shall have adequate Individual Treatment Plans ("ITPs"). In order to provide the juveniles with adequate ITPs, Defendants shall implement the provisions contained in ¶¶ 35-43.

36. No later than 21 days after admission, a multidisciplinary team of direct care staff and qualified professionals, including the facility based psychologist, shall meet with the juvenile to assess a juvenile's treatment needs. A member of the facility's medical staff shall attend such treatment meeting with appropriate medical information and charts.

37. No later than 30 days after admission, the multidisciplinary treatment team shall develop and implement an initial Individual Treatment Plan ("ITP") for each juvenile housed at the treatment facilities. Qualified and adequately trained professional staff, including the facility based psychologist, shall coordinate and oversee the development and implementation of the ITP plans. A final, complete, and full ITP shall be developed and implemented within 45 days of admission.

38. The ITP shall include meaningful and specific short-term and long-term treatment goals and appropriate periodic reevaluation and follow-up. The ITP shall adequately delineate staff responsibilities for the programs. The ITP shall include any psychiatric/psychological evaluations with recommendations and actions noted and a plan for follow-up by the multidisciplinary treatment team based on the evaluations. If an ITP is ineffective, the multidisciplinary treatment team shall timely modify the plan, with oversight from the facility based psychologist. ITPs shall be kept in the juvenile's record.

39. Defendants shall provide sufficient services to adequately implement, maintain, and modify each juvenile's ITP.

40. Defendants shall hire sufficient and qualified staff and counselors to implement all ITPs and shall provide adequate access to sufficient outside consultant services necessary to meet the goals identified in the ITPs.

41. Defendants shall indicate in each juvenile's ITP the specific criteria and goals that the juvenile must meet or satisfy in order to gain release from the treatment facility. Defendants shall not arbitrarily withhold release from a juvenile that has satisfied his or her release goals and criteria. The release goals and criteria shall contain clear timelines for release. Defendants shall inform juveniles clearly of the goals and timeliness relevant to his or her release from the facility.

42. Every juvenile's ITP shall address the provision of aftercare services and shall, if such services are required, identify factors necessary to the provision of meaningful aftercare services, such as factors that contribute to the risk that the juvenile will become a repeat offender.

43. Defendants shall establish specific formats and guidelines for therapeutic activity required under juvenile individual treatment plans, including the following:

a. Individual and group counseling shall be conducted only by staff members who have been adequately trained and credentialed/certified under the various training programs offered for such activity through the Department for Social Services for college and/or graduate study credit at the universities within Kentucky;

b. Group activity shall be of manageable size not to exceed eight residents;

c. At least two staff members shall be present to conduct group activities;

d. Defendants shall adequately and regularly document all individual and group counseling.

C. Education & Vocational Training & Structured Activities

44. All juveniles, including juveniles with disabilities, shall have adequate educational and vocational services that are individualized to meet each juvenile's rehabilitative needs. In order to provide the juveniles with adequate educational and vocational services and adequate structured activities, Defendants shall implement the provisions contained in ¶¶ 44-57.

(1) General Population

45. Defendants shall continue to provide all juveniles housed at the treatment facilities with adequate educational and vocational services. Defendants shall ensure that an adequate number of qualified and experienced teachers are available to provide such services. Defendants shall continue to provide adequate instructional material and space for educational services.

46. Within 30 days of admission, Defendants shall assess a juvenile's education needs and develop and implement an individual education plan with meaningful and specific educational and vocational goals to address identified needs.

47. Qualified professionals shall review and revise a juvenile's individual education plan with appropriate frequency.

(2) Juveniles with Disabilities

48. Defendants shall abide by all mandatory requirements and timelines set forth under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1401 et seq.

49. Defendants shall screen a juvenile for physical and learning disabilities. The screening shall include questions about whether the juvenile has been previously identified by the public school system as having an educational disability, previous educational history, and a sufficient medical review to determine whether certain educational disabilities are present, such as hearing impairments, including deafness, speech or language impairments, visual impairments, including blindness, mental retardation, or serious emotional disturbances adversely affecting educational performance.

50. If a juvenile has been previously identified as having an educational disability, Defendants shall take all lawful steps to immediately obtain a copy of the juvenile's individualized education plan ("IEP") required under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1401 et seq. Defendants shall assess the adequacy of the juvenile's IEP and either implement it as written if it is an adequate plan or, if the IEP is inadequate, rewrite the plan to make it adequate, and then implement the revised IEP. If Defendants are unable to obtain a juvenile's original IEP in a timely manner, Defendants shall create an IEP for such juvenile.

51. If the juvenile has not been previously identified as having an educational disability, but indications of such a disability exist, an adequate evaluation must be performed within the time limits prescribed by federal law. Kentucky shall use only professionally accepted tests to complete the evaluation. A copy of this educational evaluation shall be kept in the juvenile's record at the facility.

52. If a juvenile referred for an evaluation pursuant to the above paragraph is discharged from the system before the evaluation is complete, Defendants shall forward all information regarding screenings and evaluations completed to date to the juvenile's receiving school district, noting what evaluations are yet to be performed.

53. Qualified professionals shall develop and implement an IEP, including appropriate related services, based upon an adequate evaluation and reasonably calculated to provide educational benefits for every juvenile identified as having a disability. When appropriate, the IEP shall include a vocational component.

54. The IEP shall include meaningful and specific short-term and long-term treatment goals and appropriate periodic reevaluation and follow-up. When an IEP is ineffective, Defendants shall ensure that qualified professionals timely modify the plan. IEPs shall be kept in the juvenile's record.

55. Defendants shall integrate the IEP with the ITP for the juvenile.

(3) Structured Activities

56. Defendants shall provide a structured recreation program, including outdoor and indoor recreation, with set and specific guidelines for such activity. Defendants shall provide the juveniles with an adequate exercise regimen of activity each day, seven days per week.

57. Defendants shall hire sufficient staff and

maintain adequate exercise equipment and space to meet the above requirements for recreation.

D. Aftercare Treatment Services

58. All juveniles shall have adequate aftercare treatment services. In order to provide the juveniles with adequate aftercare treatment services, Defendants shall implement the provisions contained in ¶¶ 58-66.

59. Defendants shall develop and implement written policies and procedures for the provision of aftercare treatment services to juveniles. Defendants shall implement and monitor adherence to such policies and procedures.

60. Defendants shall develop and implement an aftercare services screening tool to identify specific problem areas to address during aftercare treatment, including the risk of becoming a repeat offender. This screening tool shall be part of the multidisciplinary ITP process and shall be administered by trained staff members. The juvenile's court records, psychological and social evaluations, family history, and educational records must be considered in this screening process.

61. Defendants shall provide meaningful aftercare treatment services to all juveniles who exhibit a risk of becoming repeat offenders as identified through screening or through the course of the treatment program.

62. Defendants shall immediately assign an aftercare worker to each juvenile in need of aftercare treatment services. The aftercare worker shall participate in formulating the juvenile's ITP and shall attend at least the initial ITP meeting and the last two ITP meetings for the juvenile prior to release, one of which shall be within 45-60 days prior to release.

63. Defendants shall hire or contract to provide sufficient staff to provide meaningful aftercare services. At a minimum, Defendants agree to provide one aftercare worker for every 18 juveniles receiving aftercare services.

64. Each aftercare worker shall be adequately trained and credentialed/certified under the various training programs offered for such activity through the Department for Social Services for college and/or graduate study credit at the universities within Kentucky.

65. Residential treatment services and aftercare services shall be coordinated, supervised, and provided by the same agency and shall not be split among various departments or divisions within CHR.

66. Defendants agree to provide supplemental services as needed to provide meaningful aftercare services.

E. Time-Out and Isolation

67. Defendants shall adequately protect juveniles against arbitrary and harmful uses of time-out and isolation. In order to provide the juveniles with adequate protection against arbitrary and harmful uses of time-out and isolation, Defendants shall implement the provisions contained in ¶¶ 67-78.

68. Defendants shall develop specific written criteria for placing juveniles in either isolation or time-out. Such criteria will define the nature of the conduct that may result in the placement and the duration of the placement. These criteria will be standardized among the residential treatment facilities.

69. Defendants shall immediately cease using isolation and time-out for punishment or the convenience of staff.

70. Defendants shall place juveniles in isolation only when such a placement meets specified treatment goals or is necessary for immediate and short term security. The amount of time that juveniles spend in isolation shall be the shortest amount of time necessary to accomplish their treatment goals or to achieve security.

71. Defendants shall document all placements in isolation. This report shall contain, at a minimum, the reason for and duration of the isolation.

72. Defendants shall ensure that no juvenile is placed in isolation without the approval of the Operations Coordinator or the superintendent. This approval will be noted on the form documenting the placement in isolation.

73. For every juvenile placed in isolation, the Defendants will immediately develop a written action plan for that juvenile's release. This action plan shall identify the reasons for the confinement, the criteria for release, and the services or actions of the staff to achieve the release criteria. The juvenile shall be released from isolation upon meeting the release criteria.

74. Defendants shall conduct a formal professional review of each placement in isolation. This review must be conducted within an appropriate period following the initial placement but in no event more than ten hours following the initial placement. The review shall be repeated at appropriate intervals while the juvenile remains in isolation but in no event shall such subsequent reviews be held less often than every four hours while the juvenile remains in isolation during the day and every eight hours at night. This review must consider and evaluate a) whether the initial and continued placement of the juvenile is necessary to meet treatment goals or immediate and short term security, b) what amount of time the juvenile should be isolated to best meet these goals, and c) the action plan developed in ¶ 73. This review must be conducted by an appropriately qualified and competent professional, including a counselor or facility based psychologist. Defendants will document the occurrence and results of this review.

75. The facility nurse or other medically trained staff shall examine the juveniles immediately after the juvenile is placed in isolation, unless it is unsafe to do so, in which case the nurse shall examine the juvenile when safety permits. The nurse or other medically trained staff shall document the date, time, and results of this examination.

76. Defendants will monitor every juvenile in isolation once every fifteen minutes.

77. In addition to monitoring the juveniles every fifteen minutes, Defendants shall ensure that every juvenile in isolation is visited at least once every 24 hours by either a nurse, social worker or counselor. A visit shall mean, at a minimum, that the nurse, social worker, or counselor actually enters the isolation room, unless it is unsafe to do so, and converses with the juvenile. Defendants shall record the occurrence of all such visits.

78. Defendants will never place a juvenile who is a suicide risk into isolation.

F. Staffing, Operational, and Security Procedures

79. Defendants shall ensure that there is adequate staff at each juvenile treatment facility fully sufficient to provide reasonable security to all juveniles, ensure their well-being, meet their individual needs, provide adequate treatment, and permit defendants to fully implement each and every requirement of this Consent Decree in a timely manner. Staff shall be adequate in terms of numbers, kind, and qualifications and training. Such staff shall include, but not be limited to, Juvenile Treatment Assistants ("JTAs"), Juvenile Treatment Assistant Principals ("JTAPs"), juvenile counselors, youth treatment specialists, youth treatment specialist assistants, teachers and any other staff necessary to fully implement this Consent Decree. Only staff present and on duty directly supervising juveniles shall be considered in any evaluation of the adequacy of staff.

80. In order to maintain sufficient and adequate staffing levels, utilizing a relief factor, the Defendants shall also hire and train sufficient extra staff to maintain the required staffing levels, including periods of staff illness, training, vacation or other leave of absence. The staffing levels shall also include enough staff to provide the juveniles adequate supervision during exercise periods.

81. Defendants shall hire and maintain sufficient numbers of juvenile counseling positions to adequately implement juvenile treatment programs, including performing individual and group counseling as required in each resident's individual treatment program.

82. All juvenile counselors shall be adequately trained and credentialed/certified to perform therapeutic counseling.

83. Defendants shall hire and maintain adequate numbers of properly trained (and licensed where applicable) professional staff to oversee, consult, advise and monitor the staff of the residential facilities, especially staff involved in therapeutic treatment.

84. The Defendants shall ensure that current and new treatment center staff members are sufficiently well-trained and competency-based tested. To this end, the Defendants shall institute a comprehensive training program, to include, at a minimum, 80 hours of orientation training to staff (40 hours of which shall be prior to an employee being independently assigned to any particular area or duty), and an additional 40 hours of in-service training each year thereafter. Such program shall entail, at minimum, training and testing in the following areas: appropriate training in how to work specifically with adolescents and adolescent development; crisis intervention, de-escalation of conflict situations, handling anger, and dispute resolution; cultural diversity training to better understand different patterns of development exhibited by juveniles from different ethnic, racial, and geographical backgrounds; training and certification with yearly reviews in standard first aid and CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation); training by mental health professionals in how to recognize and deal with mentally ill and/or potentially suicidal juveniles; training by a local medical professional, including training in recognizing the side-effects of medications commonly administered at the treatment centers; security and search procedures, use of force regulations and tactics; supervision of juveniles; report writing; juvenile and staff rules and regulations; rights and responsibilities of juveniles; all emergency procedures; and training in HIV related issues. Defendants shall adequately document all training.

85. Program managers shall be required to have the same level of initial training as front-line staff.

86. Defendants shall require that staff meetings be held at appropriate intervals among personnel within each facility and between facility personnel and central office personnel.

87. Defendants shall evaluate current personnel policies, including entry level salaries, and make any necessary changes or modifications to ensure that competent and qualified staff are available in adequate numbers at all treatment facilities.

G. Medical Care

88. Defendants shall ensure that adequate, regular and continuous medical care is provided to juveniles at the treatment centers. In order to provide adequate, regular and continuous medical care, Defendants shall implement the provisions contained in ¶¶ 87-102.

89. Defendants must hire or develop a contractual relationship with a licensed and Board certified physician to serve as the Statewide Medical Authority for all juvenile residential treatment facilities. At a minimum, the Statewide Medical Authority shall approve and supervise a medical quality assurance program to be used in each residential treatment facility, and approve and supervise all medical policies, procedures, and protocols used at the residential treatment facilities.

90. For each facility, Defendants must either hire or develop a contractual relationship with the following medical personnel: (1) a physician to consult with facility medical staff and provide sick call services as needed, provide 24 hours/day, seven days/week on-call medical coverage, arrange for admission, when necessary, to a local hospital, and meet quarterly with the psychologists, psychiatrists, and nursing staff; (2) one full-time registered nurse (RN) and one licensed practical nurse (LPN) on back-up; and (3) major sub-specialty medical care providers to evaluate and provide care for juveniles referred to them by the treatment centers' physician.

91. The RNs and LPNs shall be responsible for all aspects of medication administration including handling, measuring, dispensing, and storing all medications, except that facility staff may assist in the limited role of distributing medications. Such facility staff shall not repackage, measure or dispense medications and shall be fully and adequately trained and supervised by a physician, RN, or LPN. Such training shall include, but shall not be limited to, the nature and side-effects of the distributed medications. The RNs and LPNs shall also be involved in the medical quality assurance system, and shall review Medication Administration Record ("MAR") sheets on a consistent basis.

92. In consultation with the Statewide Medical Authority and in accordance with accepted medical standards, Defendants shall revise and update the intake medical/mental health screening form used to evaluate all juveniles upon their admission to the treatment centers.

93. Defendants must provide inservice training to all appropriate staff in how to complete the screening form.

94. Defendants shall use medically trained treatment center personnel or a medical professional to conduct medical screening.

95. All medical screening forms with positive responses must be reviewed by a nurse or physician and must become part of a juvenile's medical records or charts.

96. In consultation with the Statewide Medical Authority, Defendants shall develop and implement adequate sick call procedures that include (1) review of juvenile requests by qualified personnel on a daily basis to determine urgency of need to be seen, (2) sick call clinic to be held five times per week Monday through Friday; and (3) recording the results of all sick call encounters in juvenile records.

97. Defendants shall ensure that any juvenile transferred among residential treatment facilities or to or from any other facility is delivered safely and with all immunization certificates, medical information including screening forms and records, psychological evaluations (if any), birth verification, commitment order, social history and social needs assessment, a copy of his social security card, and a copy of his education records. Defendants' medical personnel shall contact the medical personnel at the discharging facility to ensure that all medical documentation has been received.

98. Facility staff shall communicate to succeeding shifts medical problems with juveniles through a written shift report and by oral communication between shift staff that shall also be documented in the shift report.

99. Defendants must develop and implement a policy and procedure to specify minimum follow-up frequency and minimum evaluation for juveniles identified with acute and chronic illnesses.

100. In all cases of juveniles confined at the treatment centers for seven days or more, Defendants shall administer a PPD test for Tuberculosis (TB) with the results of the test forwarded immediately to the facility physician. If the test result is positive, the juvenile shall be immediately scheduled for a chest x-ray, with appropriate medical care and attention, including isolation, to be provided thereafter as indicated.

101. Defendants shall implement policies and procedures regarding HIV and AIDS in conjunction with the local public health department and/or a physician.

102. All over-the-counter drugs shall be in unit dosages.

103. No juvenile shall be disciplined for or otherwise discouraged from accessing the health care delivery system.

H. Mental Health Care

104. Defendants shall ensure that adequate, regular and continuous mental health care is provided to juveniles at the treatment centers. In order to ensure that adequate, regular and continuous mental health care is provided, Defendants shall implement the following substantive provisions contained in ¶¶ 104-118.

105. Defendants must either hire or develop a contractual relationship with the following mental health personnel: (1) a licensed psychiatrist (or a psychiatric resident in training under supervision of a licensed psychiatrist) present at the facility for four hours per week and available on call, as needed, for providing such services as crises intervention, diagnosing juveniles, medication prescriptions and renewals, and other consultation, as appropriate. The licensed psychiatrist shall be Board certified and where available shall be Board certified in child psychiatry; (2) one facility based clinical psychologist with a minimum of a masters degree in psychology present at the facility for every 45 juveniles. Each facility shall have at least one such facility based psychologist. In rural areas, if after their best efforts, Defendants are unable to hire or contract with a Ph.D or masters level psychologist, Defendants may use a QMHP. The facility based psychologist (or QMHP in rural areas) shall function as the treatment coordinator for the juveniles of each facility. If the facility based psychologist has only a masters degree in psychology or is a QMHP, he/she shall be supervised by a licensed clinical Ph.D. psychologist; (3) sufficient Ph.D. clinical psychologists to comply with the terms of this Decree, including supervising facility based psychologists and QMHPs, providing treatment to juveniles when needed, conducting and reviewing mental health evaluations of juveniles, reviewing and approving policies and procedures concerning the mental health care of juveniles and otherwise overseeing the provision of mental health services to juveniles; and (4) major sub-specialty mental health care providers to evaluate and provide care for juveniles referred to them by the treatment centers' psychologists.

106. Defendants shall write and implement policies and procedures for treatment referrals from the QMHP or masters level psychologist to a Ph.D. psychologist or psychiatrist as appropriate for juveniles' treatment needs. At a minimum, these policies shall provide for immediate and automatic referral for appropriate treatment to a Ph.D. psychologist or psychiatrist whenever: a) a juvenile's mental health poses a risk of physical harm to himself or others (e.g., any suicidal ideation); b) any juvenile exhibiting any mental health problems does not have a current mental health diagnosis from a Ph.D. psychologist or psychiatrist; or c) any juvenile requires a change of medication prescribed as a result of any mental health condition (including initiating and terminating medications).

107. Defendants shall ensure that the facility psychologist(s) oversees the provision of mental health services to juveniles and provides clinical oversight to the juveniles' treatment programs.

108. The Defendants shall screen all juveniles for suicide risk, special needs, and acute mental distress immediately upon their admission to the treatment centers. Defendants shall revise its medical screening form to include sufficient inquiry into such mental health conditions. The mental health and suicide risk portion of the medical screening questionnaire shall be administered by mental health trained staff and reviewed by the facility based psychologist. The reviewing facility based psychologist must sign the screening form to indicate the form has been reviewed and assessed. All such screening forms shall be forwarded to the medical unit.

109. Defendants shall provide mental health evaluations to juveniles who have not had a mental health evaluation within the preceding year if the juvenile is not on psychotropic medication. Defendants will perform this evaluation within 14 days of admission if the juvenile has not had a mental health evaluation in the preceding year or arrives at the facility without such an evaluation. Otherwise, Defendants shall perform this evaluation within 14 days after the expiration of one year after the juvenile's last mental health evaluation. Defendants will provide such mental health evaluations more frequently if such evaluations are necessary to provide adequate treatment.

110. Defendants shall provide mental health evaluations to juveniles taking psychotropic medications and who have not had a mental health evaluation within the preceding six months. Defendants will perform this evaluation within 14 days of admission if the juvenile has not had a mental health evaluation in the preceding six months or arrives at the facility without such an evaluation. Otherwise, Defendants will perform this evaluation within 14 days after the expiration of six months after the juvenile's last mental health evaluation. Defendants will provide such mental health evaluations more frequently if such evaluations are necessary to provide adequate treatment.

111. A mental health evaluation must be performed by either a psychiatrist or Ph.D. psychologist, and must contain at least a complete Mental Status Evaluation (MSE) and additional psychological testing as appropriate for the juvenile's special needs.

112. Defendants shall ensure that the facility based psychologist reviews medical screening forms and the mental health evaluation of each juvenile.

113. A psychiatrist or Ph.D. psychologist shall develop and Defendants shall implement an adequate mental health treatment plan for all juveniles on psychotropic medication and for all juveniles identified as in need of mental health services.

114. Defendants shall ensure that a mental health care provider is available on-call 24 hours a day, seven days per week, for crisis intervention services. Defendants shall arrange for psychiatric beds when needed either at the treatment centers, or at a local hospital.

115. If the appropriate mental health care professional recommends that any juvenile needs further mental health treatment or review, the Defendants shall promptly arrange for such treatment and shall promptly transport the juvenile to obtain such treatment.

116. The Defendants shall develop and implement written policies and procedures on suicide prevention and the treatment of special needs juveniles.

117. Defendants shall ensure that all direct care staff receive adequate training by a licensed mental health professional in the proper response to a suicide or suicide attempt, in identifying and screening juveniles, and in recognizing high-risk groups and periods for suicide and suicide attempts.

118. Immediately upon signing the Consent Decree, Defendants shall renovate all treatment facility isolation rooms to ensure that they contain no exposed conduits, sharp edges, or other hazards that could be utilized in a suicide attempt.

I. Classification

119. Defendants shall adequately assess, classify and place juveniles among Kentucky facilities. In order to adequately assess, classify and place juveniles among Kentucky facilities, Defendants shall implement the following substantive provisions contained in ¶¶ 119-124.

120. Defendants shall classify juveniles by using a risk evaluation model that contains, at a minimum, reference to the offense the juvenile committed and an individual assessment of each juvenile's social, medical, and psychological records.

121. Juvenile classification and reclassification shall be performed by a team of trained personnel.

122. Defendants shall ensure that the classification team receives all information necessary to make an adequate juvenile classification. This information shall include the court order and any educational records, social or behavioral assessments, psychological evaluations, or physical evaluations.

123. Defendants shall place juveniles among the treatment facilities in a manner such that each juvenile is placed in the least restrictive environment appropriate to his classification. No juvenile shall be placed in a facility that is incapable of treating his or her special needs.

124. No juvenile will be housed in a treatment facility that does not match the juvenile's general classification. No juvenile shall be transferred to a treatment facility of a different classification level unless that juvenile has been reclassified.

J. Fire Safety

125. In order that juvenile treatment centers are made fire safe, the Defendants shall institute the following upgrades and/or renovations:

a. remove or otherwise secure all exposed extension cords and electrical conduits and comply with all state and local electrical codes;

b. remove or cover all dangerous exposed lightbulbs in the facilities and replace fixtures with security grade hardware.

126. Treatment center staff shall continue to be trained in fire prevention and emergency procedures, including evacuation plans. Such training shall be documented.

K. Bedspace and Overcrowding

127. No juvenile shall be housed in any area other than properly designated living quarters, and no juveniles shall be made to sleep on the floor, or a closet, or in any place other than a bed raised at least twelve inches off the floor.

128. The population shall not exceed the number of available beds in properly designated living quarters not under construction, renovation, or dedicated to alternative uses. Defendants shall continue to maintain records of daily juvenile population and the number of juveniles in each room.

L. Maintenance and Sanitation

129. Defendants shall remove old stains and scale/shower film and eliminate bacteria in the shower and living quarter areas. This cleaning shall be in addition to ongoing daily maintenance and sanitation.

130. Defendants shall develop and implement written policies and procedures to ensure the daily cleaning of all juvenile living quarters. It shall be the responsibility of treatment center staff to inspect all areas regularly to maintain sanitary conditions.

V. TREATMENT CENTER CONSTRUCTION AND/OR RENOVATION

131. If the Defendants decide to construct new treatment facilities or to substantially renovate or otherwise replace any existing treatment facility, the Defendants agree to construct any new treatment centers or renovatereplace the existing facility in compliance with: (1) the American Correctional Association's ("ACA") standards in effect at the time of construction; (2) the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq., and the regulations thereunder; and (3) all Kentucky fire codes and regulations. In addition, once construction or renovationreplacement is completed, the Defendants agree to seek, gain and maintain ACA accreditation.

VI. CONSTRUCTION, IMPLEMENTATION, AND TIMING OF COMPLIANCE

132. Except where otherwise specifically indicated, the Defendants shall implement all provisions of this Decree within 180 days after signing this Decree.

133. This Consent Decree shall apply to all juvenile treatment centers operated by or on behalf of the Commonwealth of Kentucky.

134. Within 30 days after the entry of this Decree, Defendants agree to appoint a Monitor who shall on a quarterly basis monitor Defendants' compliance with each provision of this Consent Decree. The Monitor shall be acceptable to both parties. If the parties are unable to agree on a Monitor, both parties shall submit names to the Court and the Court shall select the Monitor. Kentucky shall bear the costs of the Monitor and required monitoring activities.

135. Every ninety (90) days following the signing of this Decree and until this Decree is terminated, Defendants shall file with the Court and the Monitor, and with a copy to the United States, a status report stating whether the Defendants are complying with the terms of this Decree. As part of the status report, Defendants shall include a report listing the daily juvenile population of the treatment centers and the number of juveniles in each sleeping unit.

136. The status reports shall describe the actions that the Defendants have taken up to and including the current reporting period to implement this Consent Decree and shall specifically refer to the provisions of this Consent Decree upon which they report. In addition, every ninety (90) days Defendants shall provide a summary of the frequency and duration of the use of isolation per juvenile at each facility.

137. The Defendants shall maintain sufficient records to document their compliance with all terms of this Decree. Defendants shall also maintain any and all records required by or developed under this Consent Decree.

138. During all times while the Court maintains jurisdiction over this action, the Monitor and the United States shall have unrestricted access to and, upon request, receive copies of any document relating to the implementation of this Decree. The Monitor and the United States shall have unrestricted access to all staff and facilities as necessary to address issues affected by this Decree.

139. The United States and the Monitor shall treat as confidential records and documents provided by the Commonwealth of Kentucky Cabinet for Human Resources. This agreement does not bar the United States or the Monitor from providing such records and documents to its attorneys, employees and expert consultants for the purposes of any investigation under 42 U.S.C. § 1997 et seq., or the provisions of Pub. L. No. 103-322, 108 Stat. 2071 (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 14141). This agreement does not bar the United States or the Monitor from providing such information to any court that may have jurisdiction over any subsequent action taken pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997 et seq., or the provisions of Pub. L. No. 103-322, 108 Stat. 2071 (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 14141).

140. The Defendants shall immediately explain the terms of this Decree to all persons connected with the treatment centers, including treatment centers staff in order to ensure that they understand the requirements of this Decree and the necessity for its strict compliance. All treatment centers staff members and other individuals providing services required by this Decree shall sign a statement indicating that they have read and understand this Decree and acknowledge receiving an individual copy of the Decree. Such statement shall be retained by the Defendants. The Defendants shall require strict compliance with this Decree by their respective employees, agencies, assigns, or successors.

141. The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action for all purposes during the lifetime of this Consent Decree and until such time as the Commonwealth has fully and faithfully implemented all requirements of the Consent Decree and such full compliance has been maintained for one year. At such time as the Commonwealth has determined that it is in full and faithful compliance with the Consent Decree and that full compliance has been maintained for no less than one year, the Commonwealth shall advise the United States in writing. Thereafter, the parties shall promptly confer as to the status of compliance. If, after a reasonable period of consultation and the completion of any evaluation the United States may wish to undertake, including tours of the juvenile treatment centers, the parties cannot resolve any compliance issues, the Commonwealth may file a motion to dismiss. If the Commonwealth moves for dismissal of this Consent Decree, the United States will have an adequate time after the receipt of Defendants' motion to object to the motion. If the United States does not object, the Court may grant Defendants' motion. If the United States does make such an objection, the Court shall hold a hearing on the motion and the burden shall be on the Commonwealth to demonstrate that it has fully and faithfully implemented all provisions of this Consent Decree and maintained such compliance for at least one year.



Agreed to by:

COUNSEL FOR UNITED STATES:

JANET RENO, Attorney General of the United States
DEVAL L. PATRICK, Assistant Attorney General, Civil Rights Division
ARTHUR E. PEABODY, JR., Chief, Special Litigation Section
ROBINSUE FROHBOESE, Deputy Chief, Special Litigation Section
United States Department of Justice

MICHAEL TROOP, United States Attorney, Western District of Kentucky

WILLIAM G. MADDOX
ROBERT J. MOOSSY, JR.
Trial Attorneys
U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Rights Division
Special Litigation Section
Post Office Box 66400
Washington, D.C. 20035


COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS:

BRERETON C. JONES, Governor, Commonwealth of Kentucky
MASTEN CHILDERS II, Secretary, Kentucky Cabinet for Human Resources
JOHN E. KUHN, JR., Deputy Counsel, Office of the Counsel
Also for PEGGY WALLACE, Commissioner of the Department for Social Services;
BETTY SHIPP, Director of Youth Services;
ELIZABETH WACHTEL, Commissioner for Mental Health and Mental Retardation
Kentucky Cabinet for Human Resources
Frankfort, Kentucky 40621-0001
(502) 564-7900


It is hereby Ordered, this ______ day of _________________, 1995.

_____________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

VII. APPENDICES

http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/split/documents/kysa.htm


Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of it's victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busy-bodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those that torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0802808689/circleofmianithem' target='_new'> C.S. Lewis, God In The Dock

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Green River Boys Camp KENTUCKY
« Reply #1 on: March 25, 2006, 02:41:00 PM »
Wow! Seven views and no comment? What are you thinking?

Another Program vet on death row.

Quote
Kevin began his life of being institutionalized when he was twelve. He, however, was not a hardened criminal. No one wanted him or cared to help him deal with his problems that were created, in large part, by the rejection and sexual abuse he had suffered most of his young life. One foster placement release reports note that "Kevin has not really had a family since he was about eight years old." His mother admitted to social workers that she believed her failure to give Kevin the attention he required had led to her son's delinquent behavior. Just before his sixteenth birthday, Kevin was sent to Green River Boys' Camp, a boot camp for juveniles, which, in 1994-95, was the subject of an expose by the Louisville Courier Journal and a United States Department of Justice investigation which focused on inappropriate treatment methods, including physical and verbal abuse and confrontational therapy. In this broken system, there was only more abuse and no treatment for Kevin.


Full Text: http://www.abanet.org/crimjust/juvjus/stanford.html

Duct tape is like the force; it has a light side and a dark side and it holds the universe together.
--Jedi Knight school drop out.

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Green River Boys Camp KENTUCKY
« Reply #2 on: March 25, 2006, 02:44:00 PM »
Quote
 
The Honorable Brereton C. Jones
Governor of Kentucky
Governor's Office
100 State Capitol
Frankfort, Kentucky 40601
 
Re: Notice of Findings of Investigations: Owensboro Treatment Center, Green River Boys Camp, Johnson-Breckinridge Treatment Center, Rice-Audubon Treatment Center, and Central Kentucky Treatment Center

Dear Governor Jones:

On February 9, 1995, and May 1, 1995, we notified you of our intent to investigate the five above-captioned juvenile treatment centers for the Commonwealth of Kentucky ("the treatment centers") pursuant to the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act ("CRIPA"), 42 U.S.C. § 1997 et seq., and the law enforcement misconduct provisions of the Crime Bill, 42 U.S.C. § 14141. We toured the Owensboro Treatment Center ("OTC") and Green River Boys Camp ("GRBC") with expert consultants on April 26-28, 1995. We toured the Johnson-Breckinridge Treatment Center ("JBTC"), Rice-Audubon Treatment Center ("RATC") and Central Kentucky Treatment Center ("CKTC") with expert consultants on May 9-13, 1995. Consistent with the statutory requirements of CRIPA, we now write to advise you of the findings of our investigation. Throughout the course of the investigation, the Cabinet for Human Resources staff and facility personnel were fully cooperative with our investigation and provided us with substantial assistance. Our consultants express appreciation for this assistance, and we wish to join them in thanking you for your cooperation.
 

I. LEGAL FRAMEWORK
 

CRIPA gives the Department of Justice authority to investigate and take appropriate action to enforce "rights, privileges, or immunities protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States . . . ," of the residents of facilities such as the Kentucky treatment centers. 42 U.S.C. § 1997a. Hence, CRIPA authorizes suit for violation of federal statutes and regulations as well as for constitutional violations. The Crime Bill similarly authorizes the Attorney General to obtain appropriate relief to address systemic violations of constitutional and federal statutory rights by the "officials or employees of any governmental agency with responsibility for administration of juvenile justice or the incarceration of juveniles." 42 U.S.C. § 14141.
 

A. Constitutional Rights
 

Juveniles in custody have a due process right to adequate treatment, food, clothing and shelter, as well as freedom from unnecessary bodily restraint. Youngberg v. Romeo, 457 U.S. 307 (1982). In addition, a state has the obligation to provide rehabilitative treatment to those juveniles within its institutions. Gary H. v. Hegstrom, 831 F.2d 1430 (9th Cir. 1987); Alexander S. v. Boyd, 876 F.Supp. 773, 796 (D.S.C. 1995); Morgan v. Sproat, 432 F. Supp. 1130, 1136 (S.D. Miss. 1977).
 

Furthermore, under the 14th Amendment, juveniles in custody have equal rights with juveniles not in custody, especially with regard to public education. Any restriction of the rights of juveniles in custody must be related to a legitimate penological interest. Donnell C. v. Illinois State Board of Education, 829 F. Supp. 1016 (N.D. Ill. 1993).
 

B. Federal Statutory Rights
 

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ("IDEA"), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq., requires States receiving education funds for special education to develop individualized education plans ("IEPs") for qualifying children. Board of Education v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 188-89 (1982). The IDEA applies to incarcerated juveniles. Donnell C. v. Illinois State Board of Education, 829 F. Supp. 1016 (N.D. Ill. 1993); Green v. Johnson, 513 F. Supp. 965 (D. Mass. 1981). Furthermore, the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794, prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability.
 

Based on our investigation, we believe that certain conditions at the treatment centers violate the constitutional and federal statutory rights of the juveniles. The facts supporting our determination of constitutional and legal violations and the necessary remedial measures to correct these violations are set forth below.
 

Notwithstanding our serious concerns, we believe there are several positive aspects to the care and treatment of residents at the treatment centers. Though currently inadequately implemented, to its credit the Commonwealth of Kentucky maintains small community focused facilities with a goal of providing juveniles with the treatment and education necessary to reintegrate them into the community upon release. The physical plant at Owensboro Treatment Center is well designed and modern. Although not as modern and in need of expansion, the physical plant at Rice-Audubon is well maintained and clean but inadequate for its rated bed capacity and has safety hazards as noted below.

II. FACTUAL SUMMARY
 

The following factual summary is derived from the reports of our experts, our inspections of the five facilities, and the documents provided by the facilities. The deficiencies discussed below are systematic and must be corrected statewide at all juvenile treatment centers.
 

A. Inadequate Abuse Investigations, Neglect, and Harm
 

1. Abuse Investigations
 

All Facilities
 

The procedures for reporting and investigating abuse and neglect are inadequate, convoluted, ill designed and ineffective. The abuse investigation system functions to suppress complaints. An initial abuse complaint is generated internally. In practice, to file an abuse complaint, a youth must request a form from staff and complete the form with staff assistance. Even if the youth obtains a form without staff involvement, the youth must give the completed form to staff to mail. In either situation, staff are alerted to an abuse filing. Both youth and staff report that staff pressure youth to withdraw the complaint, resulting in many complaints being withdrawn without investigation. More often, complaints are never filed because the youth fear retribution from staff. The current procedures for filing complaints are insufficient to provide adequate protection for youth.
 

For abuse complaints that are filed, the complaints are not processed with any sense of priority. Minor complaints and infractions receive the same level of attention as major incidents of physical and verbal abuse. Consequently, a severe backlog of abuse complaints exists and severe incidents of abuse remain uninvestigated. When finally investigated, major incidents of abuse are impossible to corroborate. Key evidence is completely outdated and often the affected youth has left the facility. Good staff have become frustrated with the often frivolous nature of many of the complaints actually investigated and poor staff remain undisciplined within the system. Without prioritization, the log jam of complaints at the administrative level results in slow and often unsatisfactory resolutions to serious issues and allegations of abuse and neglect.
 

In those instances where complaints of staff misconduct are substantiated, Kentucky fails to properly discipline and remove such staff from contact with the youth. Facility superintendents do not have the authority to fire abusive staff. Consequently, a facility's staff are not truly accountable to the facility's superintendent. This lack of accountability leads to a lack of control at the facilities and prevents resolution of facility problems, thus placing residents in danger of repeated abuse. Problem staff are simply ignored or shuffled around to other facilities. Many such staff remain in contact with juveniles. Accountability within the entire Kentucky system is a severe deficiency resulting in continued abuse and harm to facility juveniles.

The above deficiencies in the system of abuse and misconduct investigations dramatically increase the likelihood of further resident abuse and severely and negatively impacts the treatment provided at the facilities.
 

2. Isolation Rooms
 

All Facilities
 

The use of isolation rooms at the facilities is improper and potentially abusive. Staff isolate youth far too frequently and isolation practices are generally outside the requirements of resident treatment or facility security. Due process procedures are significantly lacking and youth are isolated for extended periods of time to suit the staff. One youth was isolated for fifteen days "for acting out and planning an escape." Another youth was isolated for three days for "being sarcastic with a smart mouth." In practice, staff use the isolation rooms to excessively punish youth or simply when the staff are tired of dealing with a specific youth. With regard to JBTC specifically, the isolation rooms themselves are in such disrepair as to be unsafe and inhumane. The rooms have exposed conduits that could facilitate suicides, pass-throughs that could be used to pass contraband, and are in general disrepair. One report documented a youth pulling concrete and glass off of the damaged wall of the isolation room and throwing it at staff. Finally, the youth in isolation are not monitored every 15 minutes per facility policy. For example, at JBTC one youth was not monitored at all for over an hour on the day we toured the facility. Such lack of monitoring presents an unacceptable suicide risk.
 

3. Classification and Initial Screening
 

All Facilities
 

During our tours, our experts noticed many youth who were improperly placed in certain facilities. Violent and mentally disturbed youth are placed in facilities incapable of handling them. This creates a real and serious danger for both residents and staff. It also disrupts resident treatment and education. All the facilities we toured, both minimum and medium security, contained residents transferred from the closed maximum security Central Kentucky Treatment Center. This practice of transferring juveniles among facilities of different security classifications presents a danger to both residents and staff and further disrupts treatment and educational programming. The lack of proper classification is especially problematic and potentially dangerous to both residents and staff in those facilities containing non-secure dormitory style housing.

A large part of the classification problem is due to a lack of proper mental health screening before a youth is placed into a facility. Without adequate initial screening, Kentucky will remain unable to properly classify and segregate its juvenile population and to treat adequately juveniles with mental health needs, as further explained below.
 

4. Staffing
 

All Facilities
 

All facilities, except for GRBC, suffer from staffing shortages. At OTC and JBTC, the problem is acute. The shortage of staffing is worst among the direct care staff where sufficient staff does not exist to provide relief duties when staff are unable to attend work. The facilities often operate without an adequate complement of direct care staff. Inadequate staffing patterns negatively impact the facility by overburdening the direct care staff on duty and increasing the likelihood of physical harm to residents while decreasing the effectiveness of treatment. Overburdened staff cannot maintain security and devote adequate time to treatment programming. Staff informed us that due to lack of adequate staff and the increased numbers of more violent youth placed in the facilities, several "near-riot" situations have recently occurred, especially at JBTC. The absence of relief staff also negatively impacts staff training. Staff do not have time to attend necessary training without leaving the facility dangerously understaffed.
 

5. Physical Conditions of Confinement
 

Johnson-Breckinridge Treatment Center
 

Johnson-Breckinridge is too small for its rated 34 bed capacity. Many areas are dirty and in disrepair. Several areas are dangerous. For example, electrical extension cords are left all over the living unit floors. The isolation room conditions are horrendous with sharp edges, exposed conduit, and holes in the wall temporarily closed with sheets of plywood. The indoor recreation area is poorly lighted and inadequate in size. The dining room is too small and peeling paint in the kitchen food preparation area is unsanitary.
 

Rice Audubon-Treatment Center
 

The Rice-Audubon physical plant is neat and clean but inadequate in size for its rated 42 bed capacity. The sleeping area allows for little privacy, the dining area is far too small, the gym shared with JBTC needs to be replaced or renovated and enlarged, and the indoor recreation room and showers need to be enlarged. In addition, exposed lightbulbs throughout the facility create a dangerous hazard.
 

Central Kentucky Treatment Center
 

Although under renovation, several of the safety features being added to the Central Kentucky physical plant are deficient and potentially dangerous. The razor wire spiralled around the perimeter fencing is so poorly installed as to potentially assist escape. The barred gates at the entrance of both ends of the living space could render the facility a firetrap without an accompanying secondary/backup release. The entire electrical system, lighting, and fire alarm system needs to be replaced.
 

B. Inadequate Treatment Programming and Aftercare Services

1. Treatment Programs
 

All Facilities
 

As a general matter, the Commonwealth of Kentucky has multiple policies and procedures covering nearly ever aspect of its care and treatment of the juveniles under its custody. The implementation of these policies, however, is often inadequate. Every juvenile treatment center we investigated lacks adequate individual treatment programs for the juveniles. Our consultants found most ITPs to be superficial and of little use in meaningful treatment. The ITPs are formula written and boilerplate. The ITPs do not list specific treatment goals or problem behaviors specific to the individual with defined consequences or rewards. Because the ITPs are standard formulas, they are not useful to inform staff of the specific actions that staff should take when dealing with a particular youth. The ITPs are seldom reviewed, revised, or updated and few of the youth interviewed even understood their ITPs. Vague and inadequate ITPs also adversely affect a resident's release from a treatment center. In Kentucky, release from a treatment program depends upon successful completion of a treatment program. Without specific and identifiable treatment goals as contained in a youth's ITP, the decision to release a child has become arbitrary and capricious. Staff apply no established set of criteria for release. Release is consequently a function of arbitrary staff decisions.
 

Numerous policies and procedures refer to individual and group counseling. However, these services are not being adequately provided. Counseling is defined broadly to include any informal conversation with a youth at any time. Such an understanding of counseling by staff is meaningless. The formal counseling that does occur is inadequate. Individual counseling is sporadic and haphazard often involving multiple untrained staff and providing no continuity for the youth involved. Progress notes are also poorly maintained. Group counseling occurs more frequently but is inadequately documented and provided by poorly or untrained staff. Essentially, the system of treatment throughout all facilities investigated functions to maintain order and does not adequately provide for any meaningful treatment.
 

Finally, clinical oversight for the treatment programs is inadequate. There is an almost absolute lack of oversight of the treatment programs in the facilities by professionally trained or licensed personnel. In sum, the actual treatment is grossly inadequate, departs from generally accepted standards, and does not provide the juveniles with needed rehabilitation.

2. Aftercare
 

All Facilities
 

Kentucky facilities provide inadequate aftercare and transitional services to youth reintegrating into the community. Currently, the youth's transitional counselors meet with the specific youth and the youth's facility counselors only infrequently, if at all. Youth do not continue to receive counseling or follow-up once they have left the facility. This deficiency has a severely negative impact on the treatment provided at all the facilities.
 
 

C. Inadequate Medical and Mental Health Care Services
 

1. Medical Care
 

All Facilities
 

The physician and nurse staffing complement at the facilities is inadequate. Untrained direct care staff dispense medications and are unqualified to monitor for side effects of dispensed medications. Moreover, there is little uniformity in dispensing medications. We witnessed one staff member discover that the medication log for a youth had not been filled out. He called the person responsible for administering the medication and asked whether he should sign the log for him. He then signed the log for the other staff member. This kind of inexperience and lax control presents a real danger to residents receiving medications. Finally, non-medical staff routinely dispense psychotropic medication and repackage designated dosages. Such a practice is clearly improper. In sum, medication administration practices at the treatment centers depart significantly from accepted standards of care.
 

2. Mental Health Services
 

All Facilities
 

Kentucky fails to provide adequate mental health services to its juvenile treatment center residents. The State does not locate mental health providers on the facility campuses and does not provide regular mental health consultations. This is true even when a youth has been identified by his counselor as needing such services. Staff are not properly trained to recognize the dangerous side effects of psychotropic medications. Nor are staff adequately trained to identify youth with self-destructive or suicidal tendencies.
 

What mental health services are provided are inadequate. For example, the "Treatment Specialist" assigned to the Western Region is responsible for consultation to multiple programs and averages two hours per week at OTC (and these two hours are primarily spent with the residents in the Sex Offender Treatment Program). This consultant has an MSW but is not licensed in Kentucky.
 

The lack of adequate mental health services is a grave cause for concern given the type of youth placed in many Kentucky juvenile treatment centers. For example, two OTC youths interviewed by the consultant were seriously emotionally disturbed with histories of prior psychiatric hospitalizations. However, these two youths are not being seen by a mental health professional. At JBTC, where seven youth were on significant doses of psychotropic medications, the facility contracted a psychiatrist for a mere four hours a month. A similar situation exists at RATC.
 

The lack of mental health services results in situations that are potentially dangerous to the health and safety of both residents and staff. The absence of adequate mental health services also negatively impacts the treatment programs for the youth.
 

D. Education
 

Johnson-Breckinridge Treatment Center
 

The Individualized Education Plans ("IEPs") required under the IDEA at JBTC are inadequate. The IEPs are primitive and lacking in detail. They do not adequately identify the youth's educational goals and methods of achieving these goals. Additionally, the IEPs are not integrated with the treatment plans.
 

Rice-Audubon Treatment Center
 

Although the vocational and regular education program at RATC are good, the IEPs as required under the IDEA are deficient. The IEPs are lacking in detail and overly generalized. There is little evidence of follow-up, monitoring, and revision of the IEPs. The juveniles' educational programs are not integrated into their treatment programs.
 

III. Minimally Required Remedies
 

Remedial measures must be taken to ensure that the juveniles confined in these facilities are not further deprived of their constitutional and statutory rights. These measures include, at a minimum, the following remedies:
 

1. Kentucky must provide adequate abuse investigation procedures for all facilities. Adequate abuse investigation procedures must include the following measures:
 

a. Staff must not be involved in filing complaints.
 

b. Investigations must be prioritized and conducted promptly.
 

c. The abuse investigation process must be adequately monitored with proper quality assurance external oversight.
 

d. Abusive staff must be appropriately and promptly disciplined.
 

2. Kentucky must adequately protect its facility youth from neglect and harm. To protect its residents from neglect and harm, the State must implement the following remedial measures:

a. Ensure that all youth entering the system are adequately evaluated with current and relevant information and properly classified and placed within appropriate juvenile facilities.
 

b. Immediately cease inappropriately using isolation rooms for punishment and convenience of staff.
 

c. Only use isolation rooms where placement meets treatment goals or is necessary for the immediate and short term security of the facility.
 

d. Further revise and enhance due-process protections for isolation placements.
 

e. Regularly monitor all youth placed in isolation.
 

f. Maintain properly trained and adequate staffing and increase line staffing to levels that allow for staffing relief and attendance at staff training.
 

3. Kentucky must provide its confined juveniles with safe conditions of confinement. To this end, the State must initiate the following measures:
 

a. Immediately remove all safety hazards.
 

b. Remove all fire and safety hazards.
 

c. Provide for adequate exercise opportunities.

d. Renovate isolation rooms where unsafe.
 

e. Reduce overcrowding.
 

4. Kentucky must provide adequate treatment plans and after care services to its juveniles. To this end, the State must initiate the following measures:
 

a. Develop and implement meaningful ITPs.
 

b. Monitor, evaluate, and revise ITPs as necessary.
 

c. Ensure that the ITPs are used and understood by staff and residents and train staff accordingly.
 

d. Adequately define the concept of counseling and maintain sufficient and qualified juvenile counselors.
 

e. Provide transitional counseling services and aftercare to all residents for whom such treatment is needed.
 

5. Kentucky must provide adequate medical and mental health care to protect the health and safety of the juveniles.
 

a. Provide appropriate medical services including maintaining sufficient qualified medical staff to safely dispense medication and provide adequate clinical oversight.
 

b. Maintain sufficient qualified mental health staff to evaluate and monitor all juveniles for mental health problems, develop and implement an adequate mental health care delivery system of individualized treatment, and provide adequate clinical oversight.
 

6. Kentucky must develop and implement meaningful IEPs,integrate IEPs with ITPs, and monitor, evaluate, and revise IEPs as necessary.
 

You may wish to contact the regional offices of the United States Departments of Health and Human Services and Education as well as the National Institute of Corrections and the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Protection to ensure that Commonwealth officials have taken full advantage of any federal financial assistance which may be available to assist in the correction of the above listed deficiencies. If we can assist you in this regard, please contact us.
 

We appreciate the assistance and cooperation that representatives of the Commonwealth and the facilities extended to us during this investigation. My staff will contact appropriate officials in the next two weeks to discuss this matter further. It is our intent to work cooperatively with State officials by entering into a consent decree to remedy the deficiencies we have outlined herein.
 

Sincerely,
 
 
 

Deval L. Patrick
Assistant Attorney General
Civil Rights Division

cc: The Honorable Chris Gorman
Attorney General

Mr. Masten Childers, II
Secretary
Cabinet for Human Resources

Mr. Leon Farley
Supervising Director
Rice-Audubon

Mr. Richard Barnes
Director
Green River Boys Camp

Ms. Carol A. Isham
Director
Central Kentucky Treatment Center

Ms. Pam McFarland
Director
Johnson-Breckinridge Treatment Center

Mr. Scott Britton
Program Director
Owensboro Treatment Center

Michael Troop, Esquire
United States Attorney
Western District of Kentucky

http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/split/documents/kyjuvfind.htm

To the extent that a society limits its government to policing functions which curb the individuals who engage in aggressive and criminal actions, and conducts its economic affairs on the basis of free and willing exchange, to that extent domestic peace prevails. When a society departs from this norm, its governing class begins, in effect, to make war upon the rest of the nation. A situation is created in which everyone is victimized by everyone else under the fiction of each living at the expense of all.

--Edmund A. Opitz

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Green River Boys Camp KENTUCKY
« Reply #3 on: March 30, 2006, 09:39:00 PM »
What is interesting is that the ejudicated kids are protected by the eight amendment. On the other hand kids in WWASP torture centers have no eight amendment protection because they have never been convicted of a crime.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Green River Boys Camp KENTUCKY
« Reply #4 on: March 31, 2006, 12:57:00 PM »
Well, in theory they do. But in practice, not so much. Especially these days as more and more of the troubled parent industry is either taking public funding and adjudicated placements as programs or individuals migrating from the private to the public sector, bringing their lunacy with them.

The greater the ignorance the greater the dogmatism.


--William Osler

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Green River Boys Camp KENTUCKY
« Reply #5 on: March 31, 2006, 03:26:00 PM »
I was shocked by this but the eigth amendment only applies to people in state custody. Let me quote from the Provo Canyon Case " 10. The eight amendment's proscription against "cruel and unusual punishment" does not apply in the situation, such as we have in the instant case, where the involuntary confined person as not been adjudicated guilty of any crime. Bell v. Wolfish, 441U.S. 520,535 n.16,99 S.Ct1861,1871.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline mandelduke

  • Posts: 14
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Green River Boys Camp KENTUCKY
« Reply #6 on: April 01, 2006, 09:49:00 AM »
In 1974, I was 14 years old when I was sent to Green River Boys Camp.  As soon as we arrived, A-Group came running to the car shouting ?You thinking AWOL?? as they were jerking me from the vehicle.  I had no clue what they were talking about, so I replied ?no?.  To my reply, they responded with ?Bullshit!?  All of this shouting continued as we were scurried to the Clothes Room, where my clothing was ripped off of me and I was issued state uniforms.  Then they rushed me to the Tool Room to give me a GI haircut.  They never stopped shouting ?You thinking AWOL??, and ?You think you?re cool??, ?You ain?t cool!? etc.  This was horrifying, but there was much worse ahead. The first night they asked me about the crimes I had committed.  Because I didn?t know what they were referring to, they ?grouped? on me.  Grouping is twelve to fifteen members standing around you in a circle and screaming things like ?face up? meaning to confess to something or confess that something is bothering you.  Nothing was bothering me, nor did I have anything to confess.  The counselor had my group take me to the shower.  They forced me to scrub the floor tiles a wood handled scrub brush in each hand.  As I was made to scrub using both hands, group members had their feet pressed against my behind, making sure that all my weight was pressed onto my arms. As a young boy, having never done anything like this, I could only support my weight for a few minutes ? needless to say how much pain I was in at this point.  When I couldn?t hold myself up any longer, the group members took turns holding me up by my shirt collar, which made breathing extremely difficult.  This torture went on for about two hours!  I begged them to stop asking what they thought I had done.  I told them I was hot and could not breathe.  The Counselor then ordered the group to cool me off and they proceeded to throw buckets of cold water on me. This continued for still another hour before the Counselor told the group to ask me if Gary and I broke into a church.  I answered ?yes? hoping to end the torture.  They had me confess to several things that I hadn?t done.  At about two AM, they finally stopped, and gave me some dry clothes for bed.  I believe this incident was the closest I?ve ever been to death.  I couldn?t get out of bed for two days; for them not to make me get up reveals how bad off I was.  It didn?t take me long for me to figure out why Gary had lied about breaking into the places he confessed to.  I learned that the purpose for grouping was to inflict enough pain on us to pressure us to confess to something we had done wrong, or something that had been done to us, even if we had to make something up.  For example, grinning or smiling was a sign that we were thinking mischief?  If we were caught smiling, a group member would be required to point us out, and then we were to tell the group why we smiled.  We weren?t allowed to say we were smiling because we were thinking of something positive, we had to say we were thinking of something negative, like ?I was physically abused by my father,? or ?I sexually abused my sister,? or something else radical.  The whole process was insane.  Since most boys that age don?t have experiences of this sort, we had to make up things with nothing real to confess.  And then we played hell to remember the many lies because we had to exchange life stories with every group member.  One around midnight, when we got out of big group (group with our Counselor; little group was having group without our Counselor), our Counselor, Mr. Courtney told us to go get Curtis in C-Group out of bed and find out why he wanted to get my brother to sell drugs for him.  Curtis didn?t even know my brother or me as he was from East Kentucky and we were from West Kentucky.  But Gary had been caught smiling and told his group the reason he smiled was because he was feeling bad about Curtis and him going to solicit my brother to be a drug dealer.  Unfortunately, Curtis was unaware of this diabolical lie.  Anyhow, we have Curtis outside in his underwear after midnight scrubbing; asking him why he hated my brother with me knowing this was all a lie.  I still had to act like I was furious at Curtis and Gary for wanting my brother to do such a thing, because if I hadn?t acted upset, Mr. Courtney would tell the group to find out why I didn?t care about my brother.  We all had made-up stories ready to use for when we were grouped on.  But if we someone else used us in their story, and we didn?t know how to play along, we were screwed ? just like I was my first night and like Curtis was this time.  Finally after two hours, Mr. Courtney let us give Curtis enough information to allow Curtis to confess.  Hence, Curtis then had to explain why he wanted to make my brother a drug dealer.  After about three hours, Curtis confessed that his daddy used to beat him and because of that, he was feeling bad and that made him want to get my brother to sell drugs.  Then we were allowed to release Curtis.  As he stood up, the skin on his knees peeled off.  After three hours of torturing Curtis for this story that any sane person would know was obviously made-up, we were allowed to turn him back over to his group.  Yet, it wasn?t over for either of us.  He then was required to confess to his group why he wanted my brother to sell drugs, and I was required to express to my group how hurt I was that Curtis and Gary wanted to use my brother like that.  This is the hell we had to endure every day, even up until three AM and getting up at 5:30 to start the next day.  We were always treated as a group.  If on person did wrong, we were all punished.  So we were all constantly punished since things little natural things such as smiling was considered wrong doing.  The staff at Green River twisted their motives by claiming that we brought punishment on each other.  This obviously was not true.  We quickly learned that no matter what we did, the staff will always found a reason for us to torture someone daily.  Most days, several group members were tortured with tactics such as thought previously mentioned.  The second time I was tortured was because I had a toothache for approximately a week.  It was abscessed and I was in severe pain before they had me seen by a dentist.  He gave me Penicillin for the infection and Darvocet for the pain and told me to stay inside until returning to have my tooth pulled.  That night in big group our Chaplin told the group to find out why I was manipulating the group by not working.  Even though I informed them that the dentist had ordered me to stay in, the Chaplin insisted that the group find out why Mandel was manipulating the group, which started them to group on me, and force me to scrub the floor. When I could endure no longer, I tossed the brushes.  This was a dumb move, since I already knew what would happen if I refuse to scrub; the group stands me up, bends me over to where my hands are a few inches from the floor, and someone holds my knees while others put there weight on your back.  This caused severe pain in my legs in a matter of seconds as I begged to scrub, but the group held me in this position until the staff member was convinced that I was ready to scrub again.  I have had pain in my legs ever since.  I don?t know what happened to my legs, but the pain has never gone away.  It is very difficult to sleep, even today, because the pain is worse when I lie down.  My second wife talked me into seeing a doctor in 1987 to see if he could find out why my legs were always in pain.  The doctor asked if I had ever injured my legs.  I told him no and I couldn?t bring myself to tell him what had happened at Green River.  We were in school four hours a day, and worked another four hours of the day.  I acknowledge that the teachers took no part in our torture as they seemed to be nice people.  Daily, we each would retrieve a shovel, axe, and a pick from the Tool Room and then we walked about one and one half miles down River Road, where we dug up stumps.  The stumps were previously dug around, causing the holes to be filled with ice and freezing cold water, since the temperature was below freezing.  We stepped down into the icy water to dig up and chop the stump until it could be turned over and buried.  On returning to camp the group had to wash our tools and cloths before going inside, in the time it took us to do that our cloths would be frozen. This was my first day introduction to work at Green River.  The group working beside us had a group member with a bloodied face tied to a tree.  The forms of torture they had come up with were designed not to leave marks on us, although when a staff member was mad enough, marks didn?t matter. On a particular day, E-Group made the mistake of permitting visitors to see some of what was really going on.  As they burst through the door, Raymond Berry?s shirt was torn open revealing his black and blue left side as many ribs must have been broken.  At first, I was thankful that our parents saw this, but when they turned back around and I saw the horror in their eyes, I was truly sorry that they had witnessed this.  Later, when Raymond went AWOL and the cops pursued him, he drove his stolen car into a river and drowned.  It was common knowledge that he committed suicide since he drove the car into the river when he saw the police approaching him.  He probably had no desire for further help after experiencing the help tactics of the Green River staff.  At the time, I didn?t feel sorry for him.  I believed he was better off because he had been grouped on for weeks and death seemed so much better then the torment he would have encountered if he had been sequestered.  One person I?ve corresponded with has suggested that by making us participate in torturing others, we became too ashamed to talk about it.  I don?t know why it is so difficult for me to talk about it.  I have been silent except for one incident I told my second wife in 1985 when my brother died from cancer.  Afterwards, I started thinking of Larry Rittenour, another boy that went AWOL during my stay at Green River.  The Superintendent had another camp member and me to torture him on the way back after he was found. The Superintendent, Mr. Thompson, instructed us to find out why Larry went AWOL.  Larry responded that his sister was dying of cancer and that he wanted to see her. The pain in his eyes and his tears made it obvious that he was telling the truth, but Mr. Thompson had us to beat him all the way back to camp.  After all these years, I have never gotten Larry?s pain out of my mind.  By 1992, I was having nightmares and flashbacks of Green River.  Many children don?t survive these behavior medication camps as is exposed by web sites such as ParentAdvocates.org or Coalition against Institutionalized Child Abuse.  But for those of us that do survive, we never become normal mature adults, for a part of us will always be those little helpless children being tortured.  Death seems our only escape...

After all these years, I still live in the reality of yesterday, and cannot understand why this country carelessly continues to allow children?s lives to be permanently damaged?  
Mandel Crittendon
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Green River Boys Camp KENTUCKY
« Reply #7 on: April 01, 2006, 10:38:00 AM »
Welcome, Mandel! I'm so glad you posted.

Quote
On 2006-04-01 06:49:00, mandelduke wrote:

After all these years, I still live in the reality of yesterday, and cannot understand why this country carelessly continues to allow children?s lives to be permanently damaged?  

Mandel Crittendon

Well, here's part of the answer.
Quote
by making us participate in torturing others, we became too ashamed to talk about it. I don?t know why it is so difficult for me to talk about it. I have been silent except for one incident I told my second wife in 1985 when my brother died from cancer.


It is difficult to talk about. Until pretty recently, most people litterally just didn't believe that such things could occure in the US in this day and age. There's also considerable power in those confessions repeated over and over again under nightmare conditions. While you don't usually actually believe the facts of the lie (some do! I've seen it) most people, especially kids will go away believeing the subjective part; the part about what kind of person you are. From what you say, I wonder if a lot of Green River survivors have difficulty smiling and/or don't like being smiled at.

I guess you've figured out by now that these tactics they used on you were not just the spontanious ideas of a few sadistic bastards. What you say also makes me wonder if these "treatment" programs were part of the same federal experiments as the TC, Matrix in the adult system. Here's more on that:
http://republicanpartyandcults.blogspot ... hould.html

Note the title of that essay? That's one reason why this goes on to this day. It's pretty hard for anyone in authority to stop these practices without admiting to these practices. And, quite frankly, they're a bunch of pussies who'd rather just go on letting little kids be tortured, broken and killed than to own up to their own deeds and take what they've got coming.

We're going to have to force them to it. And, as the criminal, judicial and welfare agencies who are supposed to do this for us (not just a good idea, it's their JOB and it's the LAW) are in it up to their eyebrows, we're going to have to use the other branch of government, the Vth Estate; our free press.

I think that's starting to happen in a significant way. Don't know when it will reach the tipping point, but I do believe that, sooner or later, the thousands and thousands of us who have seen this firsthand will catch a story on the news or something and quit keeping quiet. If it were just you or just me, who'd believe us? But there must be hundreds of thousands of us. And some insiders w/ more credibility, such as those teachers who wittnessed but didn't participate in your torture, are bound to speak up once the story takes on momentum.

So thanks for doing this small part of that important work. It takes a thousand voices to tell just one story. This is one hell of a complicated story and a bitterly shameful one at that. It may take hundreds of thousands. But I do believe we'll get there.

So, what else do you know about the history, funding, people? If you can remember the names of the staff, especially the higher ups, I'd be curious to see what they're up to now. If anyone you're in touch with from there wants to post here, please pass along my invitation.

Let's get this party started!  ::rocker::

What kind of humanism expresses its reluctance to sacrifice military casualties by devastating the civilian economy of its adversary for decades to come?  
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0684855674/circlofmiamithem' target='_new'> Henry Kissinger

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline mandelduke

  • Posts: 14
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Green River Boys Camp KENTUCKY
« Reply #8 on: April 01, 2006, 05:51:00 PM »
Copyright Louisville Courier Journal

NEWS; Byline=R.G._DUNLOP;_DEBORAH_YETTER; Date=06/12/1994;
Year=1994; Month=06;  Page=01; Book=A;  
Edition=METRO;




Chucki Nichols, 25, spent virtually all of his teen-age years in state
residential centers, including Central Kentucky and Green River. He's now in prison, serving 15 years for the murder and robbery of a southern Jefferson County man. Nichols said the centers did little to help him."They say kids are in there for treatment, but they just make things worse," he said. "I ain't asking for nothing -- I just want (the abuses) stopped." Otherwise, "the kids that are in there now are going to wind up where I am -- in the pen."  

Earlier this year, officials in Frankfort were shocked by allegations that a banned form of group counseling called "grouping" appeared to be in use at Central Kentucky, one of 12 centers for juvenile offenders run by the state Cabinet for Human Resources. Grouping is strictly forbidden by the cabinet and in fact was banned twice after it was linked to the deaths of two boys in state care. The last boy to die was Dominic Owens, in 1983.






. http://www.tsc.state.tn.us/OPINIONS/tcc ... inesAD.opn
Miles recalled visiting the petitioner at the Green River Boys Camp and the petitioner cried and begged their mother to take him home, but their stepfather refused to let her.  After their mother attempted suicide,  



  Dr. Richart explained that residents at Green River were subjected to "grouping" for simple reasons, such as not having a good opinion of themselves or taking an extra packet of sugar at lunch.  After becoming convinced that the residents were being harmed "as a result of using these very controversial emotionally and psychologically harassing techniques,"

Dr. Richart became concerned about the youths? psychological state and the damage that might occur.  He recalled having to transport some youths to mental institutions because they experienced "psychotic breaks" while at camp.  Dr. Richart said that Green River had compounded the youths? feelings of isolation and had done nothing to contribute to pro-social behavior, and he was not surprised to learn that many of them subsequently wen t to prison
Just before his sixteenth birthday, Kevin was sent to Green River Boys' Camp, a boot camp for juveniles, which, in 1994-95, was the subject of an expose by the Louisville Courier Journal and a United States Department of Justice investigation which focused on inappropriate treatment methods, including physical and verbal abuse and confrontational therapy. In this broken system, there was only more abuse and no treatment for Kevin.



hometown.aol.co.uk/ibf2001/myhomepage/aboutme.html

Kevin went on trial for his life in a community that had been saturated with prejudicial publicity. The prosecutor collected petitions in favor of the death penalty and presented them to the trial court as the trial began. Petitions were also sent to President Ronald Reagan urging the death penalty for all three defendants. Even in the face of such community outrage, no motion for a change of venue was made. When Kevin was first charged, his lawyer asked news stations not to use his name because he was a juvenile. Every one of the local television stations, however, aired 17 year old Kevin?s name

I know two boys from my home town that were at green river last I heard one was in jail for murder the other had tried to kill himself..

[ This Message was edited by: mandelduke on 2006-04-01 14:56 ]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: Green River Boys Camp KENTUCKY
« Reply #9 on: December 04, 2008, 02:22:58 PM »
I WAS AT GREEN RIVER BOY CAMP IN 94-95,I WAS IN UNIT 16,ME AND 6 OTHERS,MR COCKRELL WAS MY COUNSLER,AND YES IT WAS A REALLY TOUGH TIME IN MY LIFE,I WAS 15,AND IN JAIL. FROM JAIL I WAS SENT THERE AND IT WAS A SHOCK TO MY SYSTEM,ALL MY TIME THERE WAS VERY TIME OREINTED,EEVERY THING WAS ON A SCHEDULE,WHEN YOU EAT,SLEEP ,BATHE,RUN, SHIT,AND THEY GROUPED ON YOU REAL GOOD BACK THEN AND I WAS NO DIFFRENT THAN ANYONE ELSE!! BUT UNLIKE MOST I LEARNED ALOT THERE ABOUT LIFE AND THE WAY PROPLE ABUSE POWER WHEN THEY NO THERE IS NO ONE TO ANSWER TO,I HAD MY RUN IN WITH ABUSE OF POWER THERE AND WITH STAFF PUTTING THERE HANDS ON ME IN A VIOLENT WAY!! BUT I CAME FROM A HOME THAT HAD MORE VIOLENCE THAN ANY CAMP STAFF MEMBER COULD GIVE ME. THE PROGRAM WAS SET UP ON A COLOR SCALE I HAD A BLUE UNIT SHIRT,AND ARMY FATIGUES AND BOOTS THAT I WAS MADE TO SHINE WITH OLD RED BUFFER RAGS,IT WAS COOL ON THAT END.BUT THE UNITS PROGRESS THROUGH A COLOR SYSTEM GREEN- IS BEGGINNER ,OR INTRY LEVEL ORANGE- FOR PEOPLE IN THE MIDDLE OF THEIR STAY AND RED FOR THE PEOPLE WHO WAS ABOUT TO GRADUATE,FROM THERE,I WAS IN A HURRY TO GET OUT OF THERE BUT ,I DID HAVE FUN WORKING WITH ANNIMALS,PIGS,COWS,AND CHICKS!....PLUSS HUGE CORN FED RATS!!!! I REMEMBER WORKING I N THE POTATO BOTTOMS AND REALLY JUST LEARNING THINGS THAT WERE UKNOWN TO ME,I WILL NEVER FORGET THE 2 MAN CROSS CUT SAWS THAT THEY TORTURED UYS WITH FOR HOURS ON END..PLUSS THE LOG CARRING WE DID  WITH 2 MAN LOG CARRIERS WE DID ALOT OF WORK FOR KIDS!!!I WILL NEVER FORGET THE 1 MAN CROSS CUT SAW IT WOULD WEAR YOU OUT FAST...!AND I STAYED IN THE MIX OF TROUBLE CAUSE IM A CLOWN AND THEY LOVED TO SINGLE ME OUT ,I TRIED TO PLAY SICK ONE DAY AND THE STAFF DECIDED TO HAVE RECK DAY AND LET MY UNIT WATCH MOVIES AND PLAY POOL AND WHEN I SEEN THAT I WAS HEALED!!!LOL!!,BUT MR KOONTZ SAID NO GO BACK TO BED AND I SPENT 3 DAYS EATING BROTH AND CRACKERS ...LIOL!!I GUEWSS I GOT A TAST OF MY OWN MEDICINE!!!LOL!! ANY WAY I TRY TO KEEP IN CONTACT WITH PEOPLE FROM MY PAST AND I CALLED THE CAMP TODAY AND  TALKED TO ONE OF A SET OF BROTHERS THATS BEEN THERE SINCE I WAS 14 YEARS AGO AND HE SAID RULES HAVE CHANGED AND THE DAYS OF GROUPING IS ALL BUT GONE AND THEY DONT DESIPLINE THE KIDS ANY MORE THAN LIMITING PRIVLIGES ,HE SAID THE KIDS THERE COULD NEVER TAKE WHAT THE KIDS OF 94 95 TOOK,HE SAID ITS PRETTY MUCH A DAY CARE NOW ,WHICH IS OK WITH ME,CAUSE KIDS SHOULD BE JUST THAT........KIDS!!!!!!!!!!!                                           JOSHUA GOATEE
                                                                                   UNIT#16
                                                                                      94-95
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: Green River Boys Camp KENTUCKY
« Reply #10 on: December 09, 2008, 09:46:31 PM »
Quote from: "Antigen"
Welcome, Mandel! I'm so glad you posted.

Quote
On 2006-04-01 06:49:00, mandelduke wrote:

After all these years, I still live in the reality of yesterday, and cannot understand why this country carelessly continues to allow children?s lives to be permanently damaged?  

Mandel Crittendon

Well, here's part of the answer.
Quote
by making us participate in torturing others, we became too ashamed to talk about it. I don?t know why it is so difficult for me to talk about it. I have been silent except for one incident I told my second wife in 1985 when my brother died from cancer.

It is difficult to talk about. Until pretty recently, most people litterally just didn't believe that such things could occure in the US in this day and age. There's also considerable power in those confessions repeated over and over again under nightmare conditions. While you don't usually actually believe the facts of the lie (some do! I've seen it) most people, especially kids will go away believeing the subjective part; the part about what kind of person you are. From what you say, I wonder if a lot of Green River survivors have difficulty smiling and/or don't like being smiled at.

I guess you've figured out by now that these tactics they used on you were not just the spontanious ideas of a few sadistic bastards. What you say also makes me wonder if these "treatment" programs were part of the same federal experiments as the TC, Matrix in the adult system. Here's more on that:
http://republicanpartyandcults.blogspot ... hould.html

Note the title of that essay? That's one reason why this goes on to this day. It's pretty hard for anyone in authority to stop these practices without admiting to these practices. And, quite frankly, they're a bunch of pussies who'd rather just go on letting little kids be tortured, broken and killed than to own up to their own deeds and take what they've got coming.

We're going to have to force them to it. And, as the criminal, judicial and welfare agencies who are supposed to do this for us (not just a good idea, it's their JOB and it's the LAW) are in it up to their eyebrows, we're going to have to use the other branch of government, the Vth Estate; our free press.

I think that's starting to happen in a significant way. Don't know when it will reach the tipping point, but I do believe that, sooner or later, the thousands and thousands of us who have seen this firsthand will catch a story on the news or something and quit keeping quiet. If it were just you or just me, who'd believe us? But there must be hundreds of thousands of us. And some insiders w/ more credibility, such as those teachers who wittnessed but didn't participate in your torture, are bound to speak up once the story takes on momentum.

So thanks for doing this small part of that important work. It takes a thousand voices to tell just one story. This is one hell of a complicated story and a bitterly shameful one at that. It may take hundreds of thousands. But I do believe we'll get there.

So, what else do you know about the history, funding, people? If you can remember the names of the staff, especially the higher ups, I'd be curious to see what they're up to now. If anyone you're in touch with from there wants to post here, please pass along my invitation.

Let's get this party started!  ::rocker:: What kind of humanism expresses its reluctance to sacrifice military casualties by devastating the civilian economy of its adversary for decades to come?  
 Henry Kissinger


antigen is there anything i can do to help this person. tell me what to do and i'll do it. donations etc
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: Green River Boys Camp KENTUCKY
« Reply #11 on: December 15, 2008, 11:17:44 PM »
my name is danny edward taylor,yes i was troubled teen in the mid seventies and was made a ward of the state because the calloway county courts in murray ky threatened my mother with holding me in the county jail till i turned 18 then as adult to be tried,and most likely as they put it,would be found guilty of numerous( non violent) crimes of petty theft and would be sent to eddyville penitentiary .  to my under standing this is a horrible place for any person to land,much less a non hardened teen as myself. my mother new of the state pen. and it's legacy and opted to turn me over to the state.  the mental abuse i received from the state facility known as GREEN RIVER BOYS CAMP,still to this day has a negative affect on my mental health,the treatment of those under privileged and mentally challenged was in no way treatment it was torture.we were not treated like soldiers in a boot-camp,we were treated more like POWS.  i've never been in the military  but this is just my sense of speculative measure.  what they called treatment would defiantly be considered mental abuse.  counselors would set up these hypothetical problem scenarios pitting a group of boys (five groups in camp A,B,C,D,E with 7 to 10 teenagers in a group with one socialworker/counselor each,i distinctly remember,as though it were yesterday,having to hold another member up by the belt while two other members held his knees to the asphalt and yet two other members squeezed his hands tight to worn out bristol scrub brushes doused with bleach and a liberal amount comet cleanser trying to force this guy to clean oil spots off the asphalt.the counselors made us scream our heads off at him trying to make him confess to feelings or wrongdoings that were not really the truth,yeah the guy had problems,but wouldn't fess up to the fabricated made up scenarios and accusations of the counselors.  we felt horrible but knew that the counselors would do the same to us if we didn't do what they ordered us to do.  at one point the weeping boy went limp as blood from his raw fingers pooled up in the foam of the wet powder bleach comet cleanser. this is only one of many terrible images that still haunt and affect me today.  i feel the state of kentucky owes me at least some kind of compensation in the way of therapy and treatment and if anyone could guide or direct me in the direction of how i might attain such please let me know.  i don't want money just treatment compensation for the trauma from which i've suffered over the years.  email me at [email protected] or call 919 971 3596
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Cutbacks In Two Projects Announced
« Reply #12 on: July 16, 2010, 10:54:48 PM »
The earliest mention I could find of Green River Boys Camp was discussion of the construction project to build it. Apparently, it was a pretty high priority for Kentucky, superseding other similar such projects:

-------------- • -------------- • --------------

Kentucky New Era
Cutbacks in Two Projects Announced
By SY RAMSEY
Jul 25, 1970


FRANKFORT, Ky. (AP) — Inflationary costs and a continuing strain on the budge have forced the Child Welfare Department to cut back tow projects which would have cost $1 million altogether.

The temporary casualties are planned construction of a diagnostic center in Daviess County for juvenile offenders and the moving to Barkley Boys Camp in Marshall County.

"This does not mean that we forsake forever the desirability of the additional facilities," Child Welfare Commissioner George Perkins said Monday, "but simply that we must face the economic reality that sufficient funds are not available."

The Daviess County facility was to have cost $700,000 and drew opposition from many Philpot residents who feared a lowering of property values.

But Perkins said he was dropping the project for monetary reasons and not because of the protests.

Barkley Boys' Camp was to have been rebuilt elsewhere in Marshall County at an estimated cost of $300,000 on land donated by the Tennessee Valley Authority.

Two other projects with higher priority will survive.

They are construction of the Green River Boys' Camp in Butler County, to cost $550,000, and a diagnostic center in Kenton County — with an original cost of $650,000 and a revised engineers' estimate of %700,000.

Perkins attributed the fund shortage to several factors. Among them:

—A disastrous fire which destroyed the Woodsbend Boys' Camp in Morgan County in December 1968.

The buildings were insured for their aggregate original construction cost of $150,000, but replacement was going to cost twice as much, Perkins said.

"With the necessity to replace this facility ... we were forced to defer replacement of the Barkley camp," he said. "Now (we) are forced to choose from the top of the list."

—A drain of department funds because of sharply increased commitments of children for foster care.

Perkins sounded an alarm on this point last spring, saying the starvation death of a Louisville child had prompted neighbors to call authorities on similar cases where previously they were silent — causing an upsurge in such commitments.

—The constant costs of trying to provide numerous services that might be handled better by communities on a volunteer basis.

Perkins has emphasized community activities designed to prevent juvenile delinquency.

He said "we entertain high hopes" this trend might be accelerated and "will result in the load of commitments to child welfare being held down."

Experience in some local areas shows the idea is feasible, he said.

Unaffected by the announced project cuts is the situation at Lyndon near Louisville.

If a state bond issue is approved this fall, $1,165,000 is set aside to build the long-sought new diagnostic and reception center there for juvenile offenders. The old facility would be used for hard core cases.


# # #
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
-------------- • -------------- • --------------

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Tower Power
« Reply #13 on: July 17, 2010, 11:25:21 AM »
The following is from the caption describing what's going on in a pic of a water tower. The need for an upgraded potable water supply in the region ... delayed opening of the Green River Boys' Camp.

-------------- • -------------- • --------------

Daily News · [Bowling Green, Kentucky]
Friday, September 1, 1972

Tower Power

EMPLOYEES of Caldwell Construction Co. of Louisville work atop a water tower for Butler County Water System. Superstructure of the 50,000 gallon capacity tank is expected to be completed within two weeks. Located about one mile north of Morgantown, the tower will serve customers of the Aberdeen water district including the new Green River Boys Camp.
      (Staff Photo by Paul Hightower)


# #
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
-------------- • -------------- • --------------

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Green River Boys Camp is opened
« Reply #14 on: July 17, 2010, 11:29:29 AM »
Green River Boys Camp officially opened on Wednesday, February 7, 1973:

-------------- • -------------- • --------------

Daily News · [Bowling Green,, Kentucky]
Green River Boys Camp is opened
Thursday, February 8, 1973

MORGANTOWN, Ky. — Green River Boys Camp officially opened Wednesday with the arrival of 10 boys at the state's newest center for male juvenile offenders.

The camp, under construction since September, 1971, has been ready for occupancy for several months. However, delays in the completion of the Butler County Water System has postponed the camp's opening several times. The staff and facilities have been on stand-by for the boys' arrival since last November.

The camp's new residents range in age from 13-17 years old. Usual age for the boys will be 12-16 years old, according to camp Superintendent Mike Yelton. He anticipates the arrival of additional boys weekly. Maximum population for the camp is 50, but Yelton does not expect to have that many boys for several months, he said.

The camp, located about six miles north of Morgantown off U.S. 231, is comprised of 100 acres and a dormitory-living facility and maintenance building. The State Department of Child Welfare project was constructed by B.C. Construction Co. of Bowling Green under a $315,818 contract.


# # #
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
-------------- • -------------- • --------------