As I posted earlier:
I have a lot of concerns about what has happened to some posters here, especially because it happened in the name of what I consider to have been a good, useful program, at least at the time my son was in it: just because I don't emote to your satisfaction on a web site, please do not assume that I do not.
Speaking of me being presumptuous, what gives you the right to judge my level of concern on such a superficial basis? Life is not the Jerry Springer show, you know, all sensation and over-the-top declarations, and superficial blurting that passes for real feelings.
I will show my concern in real life, by doing something to improve these programs and, in other ways, to help kids who are ruining their lives because they have lost regard for the value of who they are.
The authenticity of my concern is something that I judge by my interactions with others every day and that is how I will continue to judge it, not on the basis of your constant long-distance and may I say, not terribly objective, evaluations in this forum.
Thanks, but I'll leave what you apparently view as a correct "one-size-fits-all" style of theatrical caring to those who are better than I am at playing to other people's assumptions.
On 2006-02-03 18:50:00, Anonymous wrote:
"If someone is such a fragile hot-house flower that this constitutes a threat, then good luck to them functioning in the real world, if they ever happen to find themselves there.
YEAH. AND CEDU WAS THE REAL WORLD, RIGHT?"