« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 10   Go Down

Author Topic: ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD  (Read 20724 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #60 on: March 18, 2005, 11:34:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-03-18 20:22:00, Cayo Hueso wrote:

"
Quote

On 2005-03-18 20:07:00, Anonymous
Cayo, the first poster gave you an Index or Case Number, so the suit is not fictional.  How is anyone taunting anyone?  It's a real issue.  



I'm not saying its not a real issue, you guys (whoever you are, its hard to tell with all of you being anon so I never know who I'm addressing when on any given subject) just seemed to be reveling in it.  You don't post here in how long, and then come dancing around.  I'm not personally offended by it, I'm considering the source. I was just commenting on it.



Quote
What other questions do you have?



for starters

 http://fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?to ... t=20#88965





http://fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?to ... t=20#88968





 
Quote
Also, who says I'm part of a group, perhaps I'm just a passer-by observing and commenting.



 :rofl:  :rofl:



 
Quote
Based on what I've seen though, I probably would bet on the likes of people that can afford to prosecute legitimate civil claims against those who just ran their mouths without any regard for the probable outcome of that type of recklessness."




Ran their mouths about what?????  

When we talk to god, it's prayer. When god talks to us, it's schizophrenia.
--Lily Tomlin, American actress


"


Cayo Hueso, you do have me confused with someone else on the links.  The truth about ISAC is for some other person who posted the original comment to answer.  I could only guess what they were talking about.

On the "running mouths", I don't think people have collected all of the facts here.  Plus I don't think there has been a lot of fact verification.  Also, these comments are very harsh and clearly designed to harm the organizations involved.  If I'm wrong, then Karen, ISAC and Ginger will win as Defendants.  If not, people need to be a little more careful before they slam a person or company on this board.

Hope that answers your questions.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #61 on: March 18, 2005, 11:40:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-03-18 20:33:00, The Butcher wrote:

""


Oh yeah, everyone's so scared and worried after seeing that picture.  I laugh at you! :razz:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Cayo Hueso

  • Posts: 1274
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #62 on: March 18, 2005, 11:42:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-03-18 20:34:00, Anonymous wrote:

"

Cayo Hueso, you do have me confused with someone else on the links.

I'm sure I do, its difficult to tell the anons apart.  Simple way to solve this would be to register or at least sign the anon posts.

Quote
On the "running mouths", I don't think people have collected all of the facts here.  Plus I don't think there has been a lot of fact verification.

On this we agree.  What is your perception of the facts?  Specifically?  I'm willing to listen to all sides, but you guys (sorry again for the generalization but hey, can't be helped) come on here and post this enigmatic shit and then change the subject or ignore it when anyone tries to pin you down to specifics.

 
Quote
Also, these comments are very harsh and clearly designed to harm the organizations involved.

WHAT comments????  Specifically please!!!!!


 
Quote
If I'm wrong, then Karen, ISAC and Ginger will win as Defendants.

We agree again.

 
Quote
If not, people need to be a little more careful before they slam a person or company on this board.

Specifics please!!!!  What was said that slammed who or what company???


Quote
Hope that answers your questions."


Obviously it doesn't.  Would you like to try again?

Faith is believing something you know ain't true.
--Samuel Clemens "Mark Twain", American author and humorist



_________________
St. Pete Straight
early 80s
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
t. Pete Straight
early 80s

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #63 on: March 18, 2005, 11:45:00 PM »
Score Board                   Wins    Losses

Those who have sued Straight   15      None
  (That I know of)

Those who have sued Survivors   0       15


Your Call
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #64 on: March 18, 2005, 11:46:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-03-18 20:42:00, Cayo Hueso wrote:

"
Quote

On 2005-03-18 20:34:00, Anonymous wrote:


"

Cayo Hueso, you do have me confused with someone else on the links.



I'm sure I do, its difficult to tell the anons apart.  Simple way to solve this would be to register or at least sign the anon posts.



Quote
On the "running mouths", I don't think people have collected all of the facts here.  Plus I don't think there has been a lot of fact verification.



On this we agree.  What is your perception of the facts?  Specifically?  I'm willing to listen to all sides, but you guys (sorry again for the generalization but hey, can't be helped) come on here and post this enigmatic shit and then change the subject or ignore it when anyone tries to pin you down to specifics.



 
Quote
Also, these comments are very harsh and clearly designed to harm the organizations involved.



WHAT comments????  Specifically please!!!!!





 
Quote
If I'm wrong, then Karen, ISAC and Ginger will win as Defendants.



We agree again.



 
Quote
If not, people need to be a little more careful before they slam a person or company on this board.



Specifics please!!!!  What was said that slammed who or what company???




Quote
Hope that answers your questions."




Obviously it doesn't.  Would you like to try again?

Faith is believing something you know ain't true.
--Samuel Clemens "Mark Twain", American author and humorist


"


Cayo, please tend to the spelling issues.  They are your specialty. :em:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #65 on: March 18, 2005, 11:47:00 PM »
Score Board                  Wins        Losses

Those who have sued Straight   15         None
(That I know of)

Those who have sued Survivors   0          15


Your Call
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #66 on: March 18, 2005, 11:48:00 PM »
Whoooooooooooooo
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #67 on: March 18, 2005, 11:50:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-03-18 20:47:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Score Board                  Wins        Losses



Those who have sued Straight   15         None

(That I know of)



Those who have sued Survivors   0          15





Your Call "


Apples and Oranges
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline The Butcher

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 167
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #68 on: March 18, 2005, 11:51:00 PM »
Quote
Oh yeah, everyone's so scared and worried after seeing that picture. I laugh at you!

You may be now, but you won't be. :grin:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #69 on: March 18, 2005, 11:54:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-03-18 20:51:00, The Butcher wrote:

"
Quote
Oh yeah, everyone's so scared and worried after seeing that picture. I laugh at you!

You may be now, but you won't be. :grin:
"


You're got everyone so worried   NOT    hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline The Butcher

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 167
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #70 on: March 18, 2005, 11:56:00 PM »
He who laughs last laughs loudest. HAHAHA!!!!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Dr Fucktard

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1069
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #71 on: March 19, 2005, 12:04:00 AM »
If WWASP goes down, that equals more potential clients for SIBS! Go ISAC!!!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #72 on: March 19, 2005, 12:08:00 AM »
am I reading all this correctly--Is Sue Scheff playiing "friends with WWASP" for some little revenge reason? or am I confused?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #73 on: March 19, 2005, 12:13:00 AM »
no it appears you hit the nail on the head
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #74 on: March 19, 2005, 12:30:00 AM »
OK--think I got it. That's amazing. WHEN Sue Scheff referred us to Whitmore Academy all we heard was  NO WWASP NO WWASP..NO WWASP---just anything she could say to "save us from sending our daughter to the big bad WWASP school Majestic Ranch." Of Course--Whitmore DID NOT end up being "nice, loving and wonderful" at all...we removed our daughter after 2 months, and are involved in the abuse mess there--a horrible expericene for our daughter. But Sue tells us she supports the owners, The Sudweeks 100% and we understand she continues to refer kids there even tho the investigation for child abuse is still underway. Now to read this. Strange.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 10   Go Up
« previous next »