« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10   Go Down

Author Topic: ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD  (Read 20749 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nihilanthic

  • Posts: 3931
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #90 on: March 21, 2005, 02:24:00 AM »
When threads like this come up I'm taken aback and stuck scratching my head, or ass, depending on how strong the STUPID is in the thread.

Why are people on this forum still supporting any facility at all? Whats your excuse? Seriously. Almost all of these are problematic and if cars made by a manufacturer had the same rate of problems as these programs (and the kind of effects on passengers) theyd be sued to hell and back in a second. Imagine if drugs had side effects like these programs. Or food. Or FAST-food? What about TV?

But, as we all know, these facilities work off of secrecy and misinformation, and somehow these days parents fall for it. But naturally, your supporters call helplesness and isolation "part of the program" and "making an impact". I'll forgo the obvious sex-jokes because its actually happened to a few unfortunate boys and girls.

So, anyway, where are we? ISAC sued by WWASPS, supposedly. Seeing how PURE was able to beat WWASPS at its OWN FUCKING GAME and is a very obvious business competetor, how the fuck is WWASPS thinking it could sue ISAC and win? ISAC isnt selling a product, isnt a buisness, and isnt competing with WWASPS like PURE was. So that angle is going to go NOWHERE. But well, its not slander if you tell the truth, now is it? I just hope I get a good laugh out of the 3 ring circus that seems to take place in american courts nowadays.

Now, about the current herd of anon-sheep in here putting down butcher for being indignant, or the "think of the kids"-idiot... WHAT are you all smoking? Dickweed? I sure want some! If a kid sees someone getting pissed off about child abuse, they might get the right idea. It seems YOU HAVENT YET.

Just whats the point about getting your panties up your ass (and apperently not enjoying it) and bitching us out if we're a bit ticked about it? Getting all defensive about dirty words was the thing to do in kindergarten, but we're all adults or older teens in here. And, we're not going in the hobbit or wtf ever you call your isolation cells these days. Why is it theres never a retort to the substance of what we have to say, just evasion or attacks on the way we convey what we have to say?

We should be careful to get out of an experience only the wisdom that is in it - and stop there;  lest we be like the cat that sits down on a hot stove-lid.  She will never sit down on a hot stove-lid again---and that is well;  but also she will never sit down on a cold one anymore.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/external-search?tag=circlofmiamithem&keyword=mark+twain&mode=books' target='_new'> Mark Twain

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
DannyB on the internet:I CALLED A LAWYER TODAY TO SEE IF I COULD SUE YOUR ASSES FOR DOING THIS BUT THAT WAS NOT POSSIBLE.

CCMGirl on program restraints: "DON\'T TAZ ME BRO!!!!!"

TheWho on program survivors: "From where I sit I see all the anit-program[sic] people doing all the complaining and crying."

Offline The Butcher

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 167
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #91 on: March 21, 2005, 09:20:00 AM »
Quote
Now, about the current herd of anon-sheep in here putting down butcher for being indignant, or the "think of the kids"-idiot... WHAT are you all smoking? Dickweed? I sure want some! If a kid sees someone getting pissed off about child abuse, they might get the right idea. It seems YOU HAVENT YET.

Thank you, Mr. Nihilanthic. Finally we hear from someone who has some intelligent and mature input to contribute!   ::kma::

It's really funny how squeamish some people can get over a little bit of guts or a "FUCK YOU."  :eek:

Big fucking deal, right?

Right.

There are plenty of worse things to get upset about......like child abuse, perhaps...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #92 on: March 21, 2005, 09:55:00 AM »
It's part and parcel of the fear that sends them running for a programs help.
Butcher, they'd prefer you to be nice when you speak of the perpetrators, abuse, neglect.
Ya know, like picture of rainbows and sunshine?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #93 on: March 21, 2005, 10:08:00 AM »
Nope, It seems like Ms. Scheff gets all upset and SUE-HAPPY if anyone utters a word against PURE, or points out that she supports  and refers kids to a program that have been reported for child abuse. When something like this happens, it appears that PURE's philosophy of placing kids in a better, safer program just doesn't seem to be holding water. And ISAC published a parents' statement about Whitmore Academy--a school that almost every student there was referred by PURE. The parents stated their displeasure with Sue Scheff and PURE in their atatement to ISAC. Can't help but believe Ms.Scheff might not be so giddy about WWASP going after ISAC, if she thought she could maybe "sweet talk" ISAC into removing this parents' statement about Whitmore and PURE from the ISAC site. Doubt that will happen since ISAC just printed another parental statement about Whitmore. But I just bet ISAC got a bunch of pressue from the Sue-Camp about removing it. But pal-ing up with WWASP---if that is what is going on???? That is way out there.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #94 on: March 21, 2005, 01:10:00 PM »
The parents who made the Statement to ISAC spoke up on "Time for some damn answers from PURE" thread.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #95 on: March 21, 2005, 01:20:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-03-18 13:14:00, Anonymous wrote:


uh huh, this is exactly what Miss Isac did and since Ginger (the Great Lady of WWW) makes her site available in every state, I think state law might apply  LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL! "


Assuming that this is one of the PURE people, I have a question.  How did you find out about this suit before papers had even been served?  How and why on Earth would PURE have inside knowledge as to what WWASPS/Litchfield are doing?  And again the question, why on Earth would PURE being celebrating ISAC being sued?????
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #96 on: March 21, 2005, 01:21:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-03-21 10:20:00, Anonymous wrote:

"
Quote

On 2005-03-18 13:14:00, Anonymous wrote:



uh huh, this is exactly what Miss Isac did and since Ginger (the Great Lady of WWW) makes her site available in every state, I think state law might apply  LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL! "




Assuming that this is one of the PURE people, I have a question.  How did you find out about this suit before papers had even been served?  How and why on Earth would PURE have inside knowledge as to what WWASPS/Litchfield are doing?  And again the question, why on Earth would PURE being celebrating ISAC being sued?????"


 :tup:  :em: Me. Forgot to login.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Cayo Hueso

  • Posts: 1274
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #97 on: March 21, 2005, 01:22:00 PM »
DAMN!   :wstupid:  Gimme a break, coffee hasn't kicked in yet. :wave:

I think that all right-thinking people in this country are sick and tired of being told that ordinary, decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired.  I'm certainly not!  But I'm sick and tired of being told that I am!  
-- Monty Python

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
t. Pete Straight
early 80s

Offline Troubled Turd

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 270
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #98 on: March 21, 2005, 01:32:00 PM »
I have a bruther named Isaac...me and him whip kids asses to help get them strate down here in VA. Y'all ain't talkin' about HIM by any chance, are ya? Who is this WWASP and why do they wanna sue my bruther??
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Troubled Turd

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 270
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #99 on: March 21, 2005, 01:45:00 PM »
Hello???
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Troubled Turd

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 270
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #100 on: March 21, 2005, 02:01:00 PM »
Goddamn dumb sons-o-bitches...can't anyone tell me what thuh FUCK is going on????
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #101 on: March 21, 2005, 02:03:00 PM »
Think maybe Sue Scheff is mad at ISAC because they won't pull that Harris statement about Whitmore Academy, or that's my understanding of things, but I could be all wrong. So it appears that Sue is buzzzzing all around the WWASPIES and enjoying the trouble they are giving ISAC, or something like that.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #102 on: March 21, 2005, 03:48:00 PM »
Sue Scheff is a real cunt.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Nihilanthic

  • Posts: 3931
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #103 on: March 21, 2005, 03:50:00 PM »
naw.

Never attempt to teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig.
--Unanimous

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
DannyB on the internet:I CALLED A LAWYER TODAY TO SEE IF I COULD SUE YOUR ASSES FOR DOING THIS BUT THAT WAS NOT POSSIBLE.

CCMGirl on program restraints: "DON\'T TAZ ME BRO!!!!!"

TheWho on program survivors: "From where I sit I see all the anit-program[sic] people doing all the complaining and crying."

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD
« Reply #104 on: March 21, 2005, 05:36:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-03-18 17:31:00, Anonymous wrote:

"
Quote

On 2005-03-18 16:39:00, Devlin wrote:


"the once tried to get a court order in federal court to take down Mountain Park Horrors. The court ruled that the webiste was protected by the first amendment and could not be touched. Here is a link to the rulling:





http://mpcourtdocuments.netfirms.com/sealdenial.pdf





The webiste Mountain Park Horrors was heavily discussed in this rulling i think this will shut down any lawsuits WWASP and PURE both if they are going to sue ISAC. Also if i was shelby i would counter sue for Malitious Prosicution. I would use this rulling to bury them and then make them pay me  BIG.[ This Message was edited by: Devlin on 2005-03-18 16:40 ]"




To start out with, there is no parallel between the two cases.  Also, there were four appeals filed in the matter, three of which are still pending, and I believe one win.  More importantly however, is the fact that exposing secrets in a docketed legal matter has nothing to do with pre-suit extortion.  In other words, you can do what your threatening to do, before a suit is filed, but you can't just threaten to do it to force someone else to do your will.



Also, "Old Parent" needs to change her name to Senile Parent!  She also knows nothing about Law.



Oh, and hi Marti  :wave: "


FORGET THE THREATS: JUST POST THE PROOF OF ANY & ALL PERJURY ON THE INTERNET and POINT LAW ENFORCEMENT WITH JURISDICTION TO THE SITE -- THAT WILL SQUELCH ANY EXTORTION CLAIMS.  (BTW: Could you explain who is trying to extort WHAT from WHOM? You apparently have some inside information that the rest of us here don't have -- DO TELL!!!)

Also to the LEGAL-KNOW-IT-ALL --- the two issues ARE similar at LAW: BOTH deal with FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS & PROTECTIONS of those RIGHTS.

Oh, and just in case those HOLDING THE EVIDENCE don't know: IT IS NOT PROTECTED OR PRIVILEGED INFORMATION, so don't let the legal-eagle-wannabe try to dupe you into believing that you can't release it to the public. In other words: POST AWAY!!! (Of course, sometimes it is best to hold one or two things back, so you can use it later as a trump card.)

PLEASE DO RELEASE THE PROOF -- BIT BY DELICIOUS BIT and watch some CHOKE ON IT.  :grin:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10   Go Up
« previous next »