Fornits Home for Wayward Web Fora An open discussion about the troubled parent industry
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
On 2005-03-17 16:08:00, Anonymous wrote:What are you attempting to say in that last BTW-?
If the personal freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution inhibit the government's ability to govern the people, we should look to limit those guarantees.--President Bill Clinton
The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people equally in war and peace. And covers with the shield of it's protection all classes of men at all times and under all circumstances.--US Supreme Court, Ex Parte Milligan
On 2005-03-15 13:12:00, Dolphin wrote:"I agree with the statement about Ed Con's. I contacted two different ones, representing basically the same schools. They both had acollege degree and were licensed/certified aseducational consultants.
Eskimo: "If I did not know about God and sin, would I go to hell?" Priest: "No, not if you did not know." Eskimo: "Then why did you tell me?"--Annie Dillard, "Pilgrim at Tinker Creek"
It seems to me that if PURE really refers to Whitmore and tells its customers that it wants regulations and licensing and stricter standards for all these facilities then it should explain without using words like awareness and trust and good feelings - all of which WWASP supporters use about awful WWASP- what the specific criteria it used to make Whitmore a PURE school. What were the eductational, licensing, background, therapy criteria that it met? Did it know about the association of the owners with the bad eggs in the industry and the animal abuse conviction? Did it meet any criteria other then that it convinced PURE it was anti WWASP. Maybe its marketing program was like what PURE's seems to be. "We are not WWASP. They are bad. We are sincere. Because we are against WWASP and believe in putting families back together again you should trust us. We care about you and your children." That is not nearly enough!
The drug war places Leo in a round room and instructs him to piss in a corner.--Antigen
If you honestly don't know, then you're even dumber than I thought. And you should look into it for your own sake.
are you trying to set up ISAC & friends for problems and holding up Isabelle and unmarried as some kind of worthy replacement for the loss of ISAC
On 2005-03-18 07:57:00, Anonymous Who is Isabelle? Who is setting up ISAC?"
ISAC SUED BY WWASP/BOB LITCHFIELD Unregistered User Posted: 2005-03-18 07:47:00 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rumor has it they're going to be sued by WHITEMORE soon too I hope they get a good free lawyer case 05050037/0
On 2005-03-18 08:45:00, Anonymous wrote:Ok thanks for the links. Now my next question is who is "you" in the above quote "are you trying to set up..."?"
We must create an atmosphere where the crooked cop fears the honest cop, and not the other way around.Anonymity AnonymousSome days, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps.
On 2005-03-18 10:48:00, Antigen wrote:"If I were to guess, I'd make a broader guess and say "you" refers to Sue and/or just someone who believes her.
The trouble with practical jokes is that very often they get elected. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0380768089/circlofmiamithem' target='_new'>Will Rogers, American humorist, political commentator and cowboy philosopher
