***I'm sure parents knew about searches because the students had to tell them about them. They tell them about everything else.
Well, we've got three parents posting here now that didn't know about them. Are we unique? My son never 'had to tell me about them'. He was also 'coached' on what was acceptable to tell before his call was made. In other words, what was acceptable to divulge about any incident.
Deborah,
1. Whats your background?
Are you asking about my personal or professional background? Most of that can be found in this forum.
2. Why are you so into HLA?
Not sure how to interpret that question, 'so into'?
3. In what capacity is this going to help you or your current situation?
I will assume that 'this' refers to me sharing my experience, opinions, and questions. Do I really need to answer that? Seems it would be obvious to any caring and rational person.
How does posting your experience and opinions help you? What's your vested interest?
If people hadn't talked (educated themselves and others) we might still witness blatantly overt acts of racism, rather than the occasional covert acts.
3. What is your opinion on why HLA doesn't tell parents they will be doing searches on the students.
I personally believe, based on the extensive research I have done on this industry, that programs give parents the least amount of information they can get by with. Things occur in programs that are not detailed in the manual or otherwise conveyed to parents. I personally consider this to be deceptive. Parents are buying a service, that comes with a hefty price tag. Seems reasonable that they would expect to know what they are buying.
And some, wouldn't have the skill to evaluate the methods and procedure if they knew every detail. I think this might be about half of the parents, the half that leave their child until graduation.
My ex didn't/stil doesn't know squat about BM. If he even read the parent manual, he would certainly have concluded that the methods were reasonable. He never consulted with an objective professional outside of HLA re: their methods. I did, and all were appauled, advising me to get my son out asap.
As to why, HLA and others don't mention strip searches... my opinion is that they know that at least some parents will be uncomfortable with this. Why create discomfort unnecessarily? To decrease attrition? To avoid lengthy dialogue necessary to explain the 'necessity'?
Considering that most of the 'contraband' is alleged to be acquired from staff, it seems that the most effective way to decrease the kids' acquisition of such would be to require staff to submit to strip searches every morning before taking their posts.
Yes, I?m being 'somewhat' facetious, as I'm sure staff would not comply with such a degrading and humiliating policy. I'm sure they'd see it as a violation of their rights. Imagine.
For all intents and purposes, these kids are being incarcerated (jailed?) for a psych dx, many (most?) times provided by the very facility that stands to gain monetarily from their placement. That is considered unethical by any rational person and the therapeutic industry in general. Unless of course they were a bonafide psychiatric hospital and a parent had brought their child to be evaluated by a psychiatrist. Ideally, the evaluations would be conducted independently before admission in that situation as well.
And to back track just a bit and elaborate on parents not being told specifics. My son was made to sleep in the woods overnight while at RC. He was given a black trash bag to lay on and a poncho to cover his head. No protection from the elements. No flashlight. No water. No food. And no adult within ear shot. Does that fit the accepted definition of a 'wilderness leadership' experience? Where was 'that' experience outlined in the literature or manual?
I have native heritage, so I value and appreciate what nature has to teach. I also appreciate and value, and have been a support person at 'vision quests' for young people. I can assure you that they do not resemble RC. The teen is prepared psychologically for the experience for weeks in advance, with the greatest of reverance for this passage from childhood to adulthood. Has several supporting adults attending. Is not sent out without water and food, unless s/he prefers to fast (this is choice). Is not force marched to the point of exhaustion/dehydration. And, is checked on ocassionally through the night(s) and can choose to come in if they desire.
The way these fad programs are run, it is highly likely that the kids will make a negative association with nature. After all, they are banned to the wild as 'punishment' with poor preparation. The majority of 'professionals' and staff in this industry haven't a clue how to 'help' kids in a respectful way. It could be done well, the truth is, it's not.
My son was vomiting all night. Screaming for assistance. No one to hear his calls. HLA/RC wouldn't exist today if he had died that night from a rattlesnake bite, appendicitis, or any other tragedy, and of course, if justice were served.