On 2005-02-02 07:38:00, Anonymous wrote:
""So the problem is this..the "Disease" theory of addiction is a merely a fabrication designed to have medical insurance respond to treatment. A side benefit is it absolves all responsiblity off of the compulsive drunk and supports the stepcraft vodoo lie that "you are powerless". It has been told so many times it has become an urban myth, a self perpetuating lie."
And what makes this statement any more credible than the accepted viewpoint that alcoholism is a disease? Who wrote this? This is an opinion, and you know what they say about opinions.
If you want to believe the lie...you will believe the lie.
I would have to say that you are all in a big-time minority with your belief, you know fuck the experts, they don't know what they are talking about but we do. What kind of bullshit is that? "
I just broke out a college textbook. It's entitled "Principles of Neuropsychopharmacology" - ISBN 0-87893-175-9. (C) 1997
In Chapter 15 ("Alcohol") it addresses several aspects of the "Disease Model" vs. the "Moral Model" and the "Behavioral Model"
I can't type the entire chapter to you, but the conclusion is:
"It must be empathsized however that no patho-physiological state has yet been CLEARLY AND CONSISTENTLY associated with alcohol abuse. Moreover, the disease model fails to acknowledge the variey of patterns of alcohol abuse, and places little, if any, importance on environmental factors. Hence, this model suffers from a number of serious problems. (Pages 650 -651.)
Edited for incorrect transcription.
_________________
"I was a long time coming
I'll be a long time gone
you've got your whole life to do something
and that's not very long"
- Ani DiFranco
[ This Message was edited by: ~-=Sara=-~ on 2005-02-02 07:55 ]