Thin line between abuse and 'for the good' my ass!
Saying in so many words "I dont think it was abusive although someone else might" is just an attempt to make torture based behavior modification 'okay'. Tearing someone apart with terror, brutally enforced submission and conformity, and harshness in general has no intrinsic 'therapy' or good in it at all.
You dont fix a problem with more brutality. Breaking down and reprogramming someones mind, or breaking them like a slave or work animal, is not good, its not okay. You might as well spank or lock up your kid for saying they have a fever.
Yeah, the fever will go away in time and the kid will shut up, but you didnt fix a damn thing. You just got the behavior you wanted.
'Mindrape' (fine, psychologically regressive) seminars are not okay either. Period. Gilcrease and resourcesrealizations can kiss my ass.
You mean to tell me its for ANYONES good to beat or be brutal or harsh on someone? Strictness doesnt do anything except be strict! There's no benefit from treating someone that way unless you mean being trained to suffer without complaint.
I still havent seen the real therapy from the original question. I'm inclined to think its nonexistant. I see that its advertised as a "pay extra" kind of thing, but thats BALONEY.
All I've gathered so far is these places do nothing more than detain kids brought by parents, or kidnapthem FOR the bastards, keep them captive and in harsh, dominating, uncomfortable, pleasureless environments and force them to do as told, beg to be allowed to do anything, restrained as corporal punishment, and forced into said regressive seminars.
Isnt it funny how you see cameras in prisons, but not in these treatment centers?
The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty.
-- John Adams, (1772)