Carey Bock Has Her Judas Gold

[Froderik]

"WELL??"  :smokin:

[ This Message was edited by: Froderik13 on 2003-12-11 21:30 ]

[Anonymous]

For the Anon making threats against Carey and taking cheap shots at Ginger and anybody else that isn't buying what you're selling:

You need a serious reality check.  But please, bring on the court documents. The truth cuts both ways, pal.

 :roll:

[Froderik]

I think I'd like a check pal, not a reality check, but just a check for oh, say $12,500.You can make it out to me.
Nobody's selling anything for anyone to buy, except for CAREY... ::deal::

[ This Message was edited by: Froderik13 on 2003-12-11 21:42 ]

[Anonymous]

Man, is Froderick bouncing off walls, or what?

[Anonymous]

On 2003-12-11 21:40:00, Froderik13 wrote:

"I think I'd like a check pal, not a reality check, but just a check for oh, say $12,500.You can make it out to me.

Nobody's selling anything for anyone to buy, except for CAREY... ::bigsmilebounce::  ::bigsmilebounce::  ::bigsmilebounce::  ::bigsmilebounce::

[Carey]

Somewhere in another thread I told ya'll I would give WWASP my emails. So why you are now surprised I did, I don't understand. I could have said no and had them subpoened or I could attempt to negotiate with them and have them pay for them. Afterall, I incurred a lot of expense removing my boys from a program that I did not want them in. I chose the later. It was going to cost WWASP one way or another to get them, whether it be incurring legal expenses or paying for the inconvience it caused me. If you have a problem with that...well, its your problem.

When I have more time, I will share with you something else that was uncovered in this depostion. Well briefly let me throw this out there for you. If you found out that your child was in a program that you felt was abusive and if you appealed to the director of that program and hit nothing but rock solid walls only to find out later that this same person who refused to help you to protect your child from further abuse by making a statement that could be used in court would not do so, but then was more than willing to help PURE by providing them with a statement, a company that places kids in these risky programs (adults that is, a business, not children who are or who had been subjected to abuse, but adults making money off of this business) would you start to question the motives and the story of that director?

Just and FYI, there is a lot more to that (the director's involvment) which you will be seeing more of in the future. That is not over...she was responsible for the wellbeing of my kids for approximately 5 months of their 7 month stay at Dundee. If she knew about the proported abuse and did not report it...she is just as guilty as those commiting the abuse. She is also responsible for the months after my boys returned home and the fact that they were afraid of being sent back.

Is she hooking up with Sue because she wants to stay in the "teen help" business because she too has the potential for earnings therein? Is it really about abuse with these people or is about something else?

[Froderik]

Very funny, jackass.  :roll:

[Anonymous]

Frod is the only one that seems to get this.  Carey sold out.  Why would wwasp even know about her computer?  She called and told them and offered to sell the info.  It was never a question of them trying to subpeona her computer.  Another Carey fantasy.

[Antigen]

On 2003-12-11 21:17:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Why is this about PURE?  Anyone know of any money they received from WWASP?  Carey Brock did, and that will be proven shortly.  All you doubters will see first hand what this crazy bitch is capable of."

This is about PURE because PURE is one of the defendants in the cause of action. Carey is neither a defendant nor a plaintif, just a witness. She's not the only witness, either. Other ppl, some who ya'll are defending, have or will also be deposed, provide information and give testimony.

To draw a comparison to Straight, this would be like if Straight sued LIFE for trademark infringement; badmouthing them in order to lure clients away. If that had happaned and sombody managed to liberate a few thousand dollars from either party, why the hell should I care?

That didn't happen, though. But Fred Collins managed to squeeze a quarter mil or so out of them. And what did he do with it? Did he hang around and spend it all shutting down the program? Providing counceling for program clients? Fuck no! He was smart about it. He spent it getting a good education. Go Fred!!! He'll always be a hero of mine.

Frankly, I hope WWASP and PURE remain so utterly obsessed with this bullshit case that they both break their respective banks and the principle players all drive themselves over the edge psychologically and show their asses for all the world to see.

Carey has very little to do with any of it. She's the only player who actually rescued kids from WWASP and then did NOT ship them off to yet another program. That is what PURE does, you know. They recruit parents away from WWASP and directs them, for a fee, to places like Glacier Mountain Academy, Sorenson's Ranch
School, Red Rock Canyon School, Oak Ridge
Military Academy, Safe Harbor Haven, New Horizons Youth Ministries, The Whitmore Academy. Any others?

That's what the cause of action is all about and that's what Carey and all the other witnesses are being deposed about.

What a distressing contrast there is between the radiant intelligence of the child and the feeble mentality of the average adult.
-- Sigmund Freud

[GregFL]

I'm with you Ginger. All this character assasination going on against Carey is just stupid. I have been deposed before, and if anyone else here understands the process, it is seldom voluntary.

In any event, Carey is not PURE, not WWASP, not Straight, not Elan. Why all the attention on her? sometimes I come to this board and leave after onlyt a minute, shaking my head in disbelief over the venomous and confrontational attitudes I see here. In fact, many remind me of the worst of the program...don't agree?  COME DOWN ON YA TIME!!!!

...to disarm the people (is) the best and most effective way to enslave them...
-- George Mason

[Anonymous]

Ginger-where did you go to law school?  You really don't get the case at all, do you?  Your assumptions are way off base.  Remember to prove a case, you need facts not hearsay and that is all Carey has.  Even in her deposition. which was on video, you can see Carey had no proof.  Only hearsay and sometimes the hearsay was 3rd or 4th party.  Just wait for the video.  Forget the transcripts, you will enjoy seeing Scary Carey going a big coo=koo.  Don't take my word for it, Carey said she talks to you, ask her for a copy.

[Froderik]

Hey anon - You must be working for PURE... ::bigsmilebounce::  
Only kidding, of course...

[ This Message was edited by: Froderik13 on 2003-12-12 08:53 ]

[Carey]

For any of you who would like to know where Spots and the other anon's information was coming from, it was coming from Sue.   She was the only other person there besides me and the two attorney's.

[ This Message was edited by: Carey on 2003-12-12 08:53 ]

[Anonymous]

Yes, it seems Froderick and his cohorts are beating the wrong drum.  Oh wellllll.  Monkey see, Monkey Do.  They will wise up soon enough, because the truth is marching on (and rolling right over these hapless fools!)

 :smile:

[Froderik]

Let me ask you this...why should we trust Carey any more than Sue Scheff? Hmmm.....?