Carey Bock Has Her Judas Gold

[Anonymous]

"Maybe your mistaken as to which law suite she was deposed for. This was in relation to wwasps' action aginst PURE and others"

What others are you talking about?

[Anonymous]

Could be that her contact with Rep Miller in California went no where, so now she's throwing out (up) new allegations anywhere she thinks  :rofl: she has an audience...

[Anonymous]

What alligations is she making?

[Anonymous]

read her post.  Looks like allegations or accusations or whatever.  Still no proof of what she is saying is true...and actually I don't care if it is. Carey will do what she feels is right.  She's proved that.

[Anonymous]

"Still no proof of what she is saying is true...and actually I don't care if it is. "

Anon, really...you don't care about the truth?  What then, do you care about?

Spots, why won't you say where your information came from?

[scottT]

Please wwaspie,  everyone here already knows how to distract attention from the real issue by attacking some bogus "straw man".  Whether or not SPOTS herself was sitting in the deposition room is utterly irrelevant.  The ONLY issue anyone cares about is whether or not Carey did or did not testify that she received $12,500 from WWASPS.

If -- as I requested earlier today -- Ms. Bock herself will say whether she did or did not accept any monetary or other consideration from WWASPS or its satellites,  that would be vastly stronger evidence than ANY second or third hand account of her testimony.

Now of course,  in the court of public opinion, silence is a form of adoption of the statements made.  However,  if Ms. Bock would now DENY making such statements in her deposition about receiving money for email records,  I can see how it might upset somebody who thought they were shelling out good money to get a witness who can keep the story straight.

[Anonymous]

Okay, I'm confused.  Was Carey deposed by PURE's lawyers or WWASPS?

Second, what this about a "preliminary injunction" against PURE?  Seems to me this is a very significant issue and one which should not be side-stepped and/or brushed under the carpet.

Anyone have a link to the court document that details the specific terms of the preliminary injunction?  

Thanks!

 :smile:

[Antigen]

No, that really doesn't answer everything either.

Aren't sworn depositions public domain? Can't we see the content and guess for ourselves the beliefs or motivation of various players?

At the bottom of it, going all the way back to May when Carey came over here after being banned from the Treckers' list, was Carey making unpopular statements and observations about Sue and PURE.

Yes, I know that the Treckers' list predates PURE by years. But it also seems plausible that the effort was hijacked by PURE.

And I still haven't gotten any satisfactory answer to my questions about them, either. By your reasoning, this conspicuous silence would constitute affirmation; i.e. there is no difference between WWASP and PURE but the brand names.

If that's the case, why, exactly, should any of us care if one recruiting outfit is suing another, who wins or if Carey managed to extract some financial gain for herself and her kids from the whole deal? From the start, the whole idea was to get the truth out.

Time's fun when you're having flies.
--Kermit the Frog

[Cayo Hueso]

On 2003-12-11 18:03:00, Antigen wrote:

From the start, the whole idea was to get the truth out.

Somehow that idea seems to have gotten lost somewhere.

But this is far from demonstrating that the authorities must interpose to suppress these vices by commercial prohibitions, nor is it by any means evident that such intervention on the part of the government is really capable of suppressing them or that, even if this end could be attained, it might not therewith open up a Pandora's box of other dangers, no less mischievous than alcoholism and morphinism.
http://www.mises.org/liberal/ch1sec11.asp' target='_new'>Ludwig Von Mises

[Anonymous]

Supply and Demand.  That's what this industry is all about and nobody knows that better than outfits like PURE and WWASPS.  For Carey to have profited in some way from her association with either of these 2 groups seems only fair when you consider the self-serving agenda of these two organizations.  

 :smokin:

[Froderik]

At whose expense though? Fuck that, anon...

[Anonymous]

"And she calls us dumb ass parents. . . "

I think she would call you a dumb ass parent if you placed your child in a program...oh wait,  maybe she would refer to you as a reformed dumb ass parent. Thats better isn't it?

[Anonymous]

Froderik asks: At whose expense though?


I think this from the lead post asnwers your question:

Ms. Bock sold her soul while thwarting honest and strong efforts by others to get the message to parents that WWASPS' good schooling, strict-but-fair rewards and punishment techniques, and redirection by loving, caring staffers is really a Crock of Shit.
[}
I personally believe a case can be made that she has been working for wwasp for a very long time. She was a perfict Mole; as her exploits seemed to give her blanket imunity to any and all outragious staments she made aginst anyone and everyone who was doing any good.

I can't get over any thiking person believing at this point, that Mz Bock's actions have anything at all to do with what is True.

Nor can I understand, how anyone who's been involved in this long and tiresome debate, can fail to understand this isn't about PURE. Only one of the many people who were on the Trekkers list has anything to do with PURE. They were ALL sold out.

She rolled over for the big dog, like the whore she is.

You can pat her head and lick her wounds; but you have to expect the rest of the pack is going to have their hackles up.

[Froderik]

God! Thank you. At last someone with the knowledge had the GUTS to just come out and say it with a concise statement that doesn't beat around the bush. Expressed plain and simple. I think that could very well be considered the final word on the subject of Carey Bock.

(Unfortunately though, I know in the back of my mind that some anon or maybe Ginger will come along and say something like "how do we really know that?" or "Where's the proof?")

Fuck it. GUILTY. Can't we just say that for now, and if she isn't, well, the bitch can speak for herself. No more bullshit. No more "Gee, I don't know..." END OF STORY. It's over. Thank you, anon. You are right on time. Goodnight.

[Anonymous]

For all of you who want to defend Carey or pretend she didn't sell out, wait, you can get the records.  They will be public, soon.  Ginger, as a survivor, how in the hell can you defend her actions with 2200 kids still locked up?  This isn't about PURE, this is about a bitch that sold out for money.  As far as the law suit on Carey, it is coming, this deposition was only to show what an ass Carey Brock really is.  This isn't the law suit on Carey.  It is coming.