Cataloging TheWho/John Reuben's Lies

[Troll Control]

Joel, Whooter just repetitively states "ASR helped my daughter."  When you ask for details...he gets a bit hazy.  Just sayin'.

BTW, Whooter, I made the request to Psy via PM to identify and post publicly (as you stated you wanted done) the information you wanted - for both of us.  Hopefully he'll do it.  I'm eager to see the results.  

I see you skipped over where you phonied up the author of that post, too.  *wink* Nice job. :beat: Why you fabricate so much, I'll never be able to guess...

[Troll Control]

If you have evidence that Whooter is posting under multiple logins, post it, otherwise you are just making assumptions,

No, no assumptions at all.  He said he did it.  Here ya go:

Whooter is the glossy brochure, while his other usernames (Mitt Romney, SUCK IT, Al Gore, Sarah Palin, RobertBruce ., Queef, John McCain, etc. ad nauseum) are the thugs that actually get their hands on your children.

{snip}

I can tell you that of the list of usernames that you laid out above, some are mine and some are not.
{snip}

So,right there (full, unedited text)he admits to posting with multiple logins, he just didn't tell us which were his.  This proves I was correct about it, although he vehemently denied it for several years.  

Can you please answer my previous question?  How does that square with your definition of "honesty"?  I'm interested to hear your thoughts.

[Whooter]

Not sure how duplicity via multiple logins is "honest" though

What he might mean is that Whooter has been honest enough to have all his posts strung together and his accounts looked at by admins here along with any names he has used as log ins several times.

Unlike you who claim to only have one user name but will not have your posts strung together or any other usernames listed.

[SUCK IT]

If you have evidence that Whooter is posting under multiple logins, post it, otherwise you are just making assumptions,

No, no assumptions at all.  He said he did it.  Here ya go:

Whooter is the glossy brochure, while his other usernames (Mitt Romney, SUCK IT, Al Gore, Sarah Palin, RobertBruce ., Queef, John McCain, etc. ad nauseum) are the thugs that actually get their hands on your children.

{snip}

I can tell you that of the list of usernames that you laid out above, some are mine and some are not.
{snip}

So,right there (full, unedited text)he admits to posting with multiple logins, he just didn't tell us which were his.  This proves I was correct about it, although he vehemently denied it for several years.  

Can you please answer my previous question?  How does that square with your definition of "honesty"?  I'm interested to hear your thoughts.

He didn't say "I am SUCK IT", so the only possible explanation for you making that conclusion is your own assumptions. That's just how I see it. His quote saying some are his and some are not, well that seems pretty honest, right? I am not him, maybe another one of those names is him, who knows. But really, who cares? So what if a poster has another username, does that automatically discredit their argument? I don't think so. Whooter makes a simple argument here, that his teen was helped ina program and that she doesn't hate him because he sent her. That doesn't strike me as shockingly unlikely, in fact it is a very likely scenario for parents that use treatment programs. The thing that pisses people off about Whooter.. well, I really don't know. perhaps it's his tenacity to deal with the threats, and bullying directed his way. For that much, i applaud him for putting up with it because he has an important voice of reason on this forum filled with so much anti treatment extremism. You are expending a great efforting into trying to convince others that Whooter is a liar, but in the end all that time is meaningless. You mine as well argue against his reasonable views that programs help kids. But since that is a fact, I guess you're stuck fighting the person saying it. Good luck with that. I for one believe Whooter and appreciate his light hearted approach to calling people out for mistruths, rather than the intense confonrtational style so often experienced here, ironically by the people who claim to be fighting against this type of behavior.  Hope you havea  good holiday whooter!

[Whooter]

BTW, Whooter, I made the request to Psy via PM to identify and post publicly (as you stated you wanted done) the information you wanted - for both of us.  Hopefully he'll do it.  I'm eager to see the results.

He will do it if you want him to.  He just needs to find the time.  The last time you came up with excuses not to have it done.  I cant PM him to do yours and vice versa.  Once I see your results I will PM him to have mine done.  Since you backed out last time, I doubt you will do it this time.



...

[Whooter]

If you have evidence that Whooter is posting under multiple logins, post it, otherwise you are just making assumptions,

No, no assumptions at all.  He said he did it.  Here ya go:

Whooter is the glossy brochure, while his other usernames (Mitt Romney, SUCK IT, Al Gore, Sarah Palin, RobertBruce ., Queef, John McCain, etc. ad nauseum) are the thugs that actually get their hands on your children.

{snip}

I can tell you that of the list of usernames that you laid out above, some are mine and some are not.
{snip}

So,right there (full, unedited text)he admits to posting with multiple logins, he just didn't tell us which were his.  This proves I was correct about it, although he vehemently denied it for several years.  

Can you please answer my previous question?  How does that square with your definition of "honesty"?  I'm interested to hear your thoughts.

He didn't say "I am SUCK IT", so the only possible explanation for you making that conclusion is your own assumptions. That's just how I see it. His quote saying some are his and some are not, well that seems pretty honest, right? I am not him, maybe another one of those names is him, who knows. But really, who cares? So what if a poster has another username, does that automatically discredit their argument? I don't think so. Whooter makes a simple argument here, that his teen was helped ina program and that she doesn't hate him because he sent her. That doesn't strike me as shockingly unlikely, in fact it is a very likely scenario for parents that use treatment programs. The thing that pisses people off about Whooter.. well, I really don't know. perhaps it's his tenacity to deal with the threats, and bullying directed his way. For that much, i applaud him for putting up with it because he has an important voice of reason on this forum filled with so much anti treatment extremism. You are expending a great efforting into trying to convince others that Whooter is a liar, but in the end all that time is meaningless. You mine as well argue against his reasonable views that programs help kids. But since that is a fact, I guess you're stuck fighting the person saying it. Good luck with that. I for one believe Whooter and appreciate his light hearted approach to calling people out for mistruths, rather than the intense confonrtational style so often experienced here, ironically by the people who claim to be fighting against this type of behavior.  Hope you havea  good holiday whooter!

Thanks, Suck it.  The guy has fabricated so much stuff its nice to be able to put him in his place and expose his lies.  Thanks for posting and being honest.



...

[Whooter]

Mr. Dysfunction Junction,I followed this link and it is part of your post.  I checked a calendar from 2007 and June 6, 2007 was a Wednesday not a Friday as your post says it was.  The information that you are using against whooter has been fabricated.  Why do you do this to someone?

Below was copied from a previous post by whooter

Link to DJ's post

Re: Is ASR a good program?
Sent: Fri Jun 06, 2007 1:07 pm
From: TheWho
To: Concerned Parent
..........................

************************************************
Whooter said:

June 6th 2007 was a Wednesday (your fabricated post says it is a Friday)  which showed you just made this post up out of thin air.  Thewho could not have possibly sent this.  The next time you write something with another person’s name on it try to get the dates right.  Are you sure you want to stick with the story that you have advanced degrees? lol



...

[Troll Control]

OK, I got it, SUCK IT.  Honesty means dishonesty.  How very...Orwellian. :beat:

[jamal]

Whooter is really like a lower organism with a primitive nerve net and ganglion where a "brain" would exist in a normal person - even with it's head cut off, arms cut off, legs cut off and disemboweled, it still twitches repetitively although it's technically dead.

I read this thread and don't see Whooter being disrespectful or using insults. Dysfunction Junction is a mean person.

Dance, puppet, dance!  Remember, I control your actions now.  I exploit your compulsions and make you act in a way totally irreconcilable with what you try to make people here believe about yourself.  

Angry?  Really? I'm absolutely giddy watching you self-immolate and run around on fire.  I mean, I do love watching Ursus eat your lunch on a daily basis (among others) but watching you do yourself in?  That's priceless.

Your behavior here has sunk you and five years of your life, posting like a slave, is utterly wasted.  Let's face it, new users are calling you out on their first posts here now. Indeed, that's results-driven feedback.  You try to chime in on any topic and quickly get flushed by even the newest posters, complete with links to your posts.  You might want to try out some new identity like you did last time.  This one's cooked.

Keep twitchin' lizard brain.  :cheers:  :feedtrolls:

It's evident from this post Dysfunction Junction is a control freak. He takes pleasure in the idea of controlling others.

Most all of you have had to contend with control freaks. These are those people who insist on having their way in all interactions with you. They wish to set the agenda and decide what it is you will do and when you will do it. You know who they are – they have a driving need to run the show and call the shots.

Lurking within the fabric of the conversation is the clear threat that if you do not accede to their needs and demands, they will be unhappy.

Certainly, it’s natural to want to be in control of your life. But when you have to be in control of the people around you as well, when you literally can’t rest until you get your way … you have a personality disorder.

[jamal]

Whooter is really like a lower organism with a primitive nerve net and ganglion where a "brain" would exist in a normal person - even with it's head cut off, arms cut off, legs cut off and disemboweled, it still twitches repetitively although it's technically dead.

I read this thread and don't see Whooter being disrespectful or using insults. Dysfunction Junction is a mean person.

Dance, puppet, dance!  Remember, I control your actions now.  I exploit your compulsions and make you act in a way totally irreconcilable with what you try to make people here believe about yourself.  

Angry?  Really? I'm absolutely giddy watching you self-immolate and run around on fire.  I mean, I do love watching Ursus eat your lunch on a daily basis (among others) but watching you do yourself in?  That's priceless.

Your behavior here has sunk you and five years of your life, posting like a slave, is utterly wasted.  Let's face it, new users are calling you out on their first posts here now. Indeed, that's results-driven feedback.  You try to chime in on any topic and quickly get flushed by even the newest posters, complete with links to your posts.  You might want to try out some new identity like you did last time.  This one's cooked.

Keep twitchin' lizard brain.  :cheers:  :feedtrolls:

It's evident from this post Dysfunction Junction is a control freak. He takes pleasure in the idea of controlling others.

Most all of you have had to contend with control freaks. These are those people who insist on having their way in all interactions with you. They wish to set the agenda and decide what it is you will do and when you will do it. You know who they are – they have a driving need to run the show and call the shots.

Lurking within the fabric of the conversation is the clear threat that if you do not accede to their needs and demands, they will be unhappy.

Certainly, it’s natural to want to be in control of your life. But when you have to be in control of the people around you as well, when you literally can’t rest until you get your way … you have a personality disorder.

[Anne Bonney]

So, who's alt are you Jamal??  My bet's on DannyBoi.

[Pile of Dead Kids]

Nah, I'm going with "SUCK IT". The aggressive trolling style is all his.

[Troll Control]

I hate to say it, but it appears jamal is just another Whooter sockpuppet.  So, Anne, you're completely wrong and Pile is partially correct, insofar as Whooter and SUCK IT are obviously the same poster.

Check it out:  

Ha,Ha,Ha.... very funny everybody. Just because Psy decided to sign himself into a state regulated treatment center as a legal adult of the age of 18 and could have left whenever he wanted all while claiming it was his parents, does not give you the right to make fun of his sexuality.  you people should be ashamed of yourselves!

This means people like me can get sent to program (as I was) for being bisexual and having religious opinions my parents felt distasteful.  

 :agree:

Look familiar to you now?  It's not a coincidence that many have referred to Whooter as "Cybil" here.  Of course, there are the obligatory attacks on me, Ursus and Anne (referred to as "Anne Conney" by jamal).

Whooter recently expressed his desire to have all of his usernames postsed publicly by the admins and I asked Psy to do that (and for me too, as Whooter asked), so hopefully it will all be much more clear very soon.

[Anne Bonney]

I hate to say it, but it appears jamal is just another Whooter sockpuppet.  So, Anne, you're completely wrong and Pile is partially correct, insofar as Whooter and SUCK IT are obviously the same poster.

Ha,Ha,Ha.... very funny everybody.

Yep.....me thinks you have a point.  :seg2:


I'm telling ya......we must be having some kind of an effect, cuz they wouldn't waste so much of their time trying to deflect and distort things if we were as "insignificant" as they'd like us to think.   :rocker:  :rocker:  :seg:

[Whooter]

You can add "Queef" to Dysfunctions delusion too.  He thinks that is one of my user names. lol



...