Danny I'm still waiting on you to lay out your challenge. It seems clear at this point that you can't back up yours or Whooter John's claim, and are now attempting to change the subject. If that's the case all you have to do is say so and the matter is closed. No hard feelings. If you choose to stick to your water pistols on this one it's your choice, but I promise you you're going to come out with egg on your face.
Before you make your decsion there's probably something you should keep in mind. I get that Whooter has sort of taken you under his wing, and you feel a little like his sidekick. I understand that he's feeding you a lot of the things you're saying in the hopes that you'll do his dirty work for him. Whooter doesn't want to get involved in this conversation because he knows whatever standards you try and apply to me, are just going to be turned around and applied to him. He's using you the same way HLA staff members used him. Do a little back reading and see where Whooter John's motivations are coming from. He has lost countless arguments with me Danny. He's doesn't want a repeat of his shame. Don't let him use you Danny, break the cycle, I know you can do it. I understand that you've got some issues when it comes to articulating your thoughts, and coming up with logical arguments. I understand you aren't very bright and you look to Whooter John to fill in the gaps for you. While Whooter is many things, he's not that stupid. In his own sociopath way he has some degree of intelligence. This however is only ever used for his child abusing agenda. Make sure you have all the facts before you jump on board his bandwagon.
That being said let's get back to the issue at hand. You have two choices :
A. You can admit you made up your claim and have no basis or knowledge regarding your comments concerning my length of stay at HLA, nor do you have any evidence to suggest I am lying when I state the fact that I was incarcerated there for one year. You admit it say you're sorry and we move on. Fresh start and I'll never bring it up to you again.
or
B. You can push the issue and be proven wrong. In the end that's what going to happen Danny. You're getting your information from Whooter, who in turn got his information from a HLA staff member who broke HIPPA laws and released personal information regarding a former inmate. The problem is the staff at HLA never actually knew who I was, so the information was never good to begin with.
Now keep in mind if you choose option 'B' I am going to ask that you be very specific in what you're looking for, and that you be willing to provide the same information and documentation yourself before hand. I want to see exactly what is you're looking for. Also keep in mind you have to accept that any standards that you attempt to hold me to are going to be applied to you as well. Also no crying about it afterwards. Remember I warned you that you wouldnt like where I take this. I am in fact a lot better at this then you are. Despite the fact that you came on here with a lot of anger towards people you don't know and dont know anything about, I dont have any ill will towards you, and I view you as harmless. I'd be willing when this is all over no matter which choice make to bury the hatchet and let you really try and talk to people here without all the nonsense.
Let me know what you want to do.