Author Topic: LAYNE MEACHAM and PROCTOR ADVOCATE, YES FAMILIES  (Read 14724 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: LAYNE MEACHAM and PROCTOR ADVOCATE, YES FAMILIES
« Reply #75 on: August 07, 2009, 07:18:49 PM »
Quote from: "psy"
Quote from: "Anti Defamation Association"
HEY PSY, are you there?  My name is Anti Defamation and I am an alcoholic....now its your turn Psy, who are you and why are you here, be honest and brief.

I am here because I was placed in a facility on false pretenses based on false advertising.  

"Placed"??  You CHOSE to go. You were 18 years old! A legal adult!!


Quote
Come out of your hole and share.  Were you a kid in a program or not?

Yes.  Benchmark Young Adult School.[/quote]

You weren't a kid in a program! You were an ADULT in a program! Big difference! You were able to walk out at any time!!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Inculcated

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 801
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: LAYNE MEACHAM and PROCTOR ADVOCATE, YES FAMILIES
« Reply #76 on: August 07, 2009, 07:19:45 PM »
Quote from: "Guest"
Quote from: "LitGator"
Quote from: "Guest"
You've already condemned me with your little witch hunt so the next time we meet will be in court, the Jersey Bar, or hopefully on the CBC for a 6th Element.
Carry on,

Dubuffet
:shamrock: You’ll need some luck with that you charmless fool.
Way ta’ represent.
Please, post a copy of your complaint on fornits.
Your levities are good lols and risibility is healing.

Now what is your interest in attacking me? .
To be fair, you’ve done quite a bit of attacking.

Quote from: "Guest"
Have you spent any time getting to know me?
This is where your attacks create an impediment to discussion. You’ve made” getting to know you” difficult, as you have spent most of your time making baseless assertions and legal threats.

 
Quote from: "Guest"
or are you part of the little inquisition panel that automatically sides with your guru Phil Elberg because he is a big lawyer that got 2mil for his law firm and didn't give it all to the save the children foundation
Here’s where your baseless assertions are most apparent. You ought to fact check your own speculations.


Quote from: "Guest"
Why don't you ask your guru Phil why he doesn't want to debate me on CBC.  
Is a substative debate possible with a person who conducts a discussion in the manner you have?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
“A person needs a little madness, or else they never dare cut the rope and be free”  Nikos Kazantzakis

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Boston Legal
« Reply #77 on: August 08, 2009, 03:12:59 PM »
Quote from: "Anti Ambulance Chasing and citizens against parasites who look for Plaintiff's on Fornits"
The fact is there is no smoking gun on Meacham.  No dockets no Miller Newton sleep overs like with Captain Kirk and the other dude in Boston Legal.

That show is worth watching for the Star Trek associations, puns, and inside jokes alone, lol, although some of "human relations intrigues" can get to be just a bit trite after a while...

My favorite character is that guy they call "Hands," aka Jerry what's-his-name. Him I can relate to ... hands down!  :D
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
-------------- • -------------- • --------------

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
screed
« Reply #78 on: August 08, 2009, 03:20:26 PM »
Quote from: "Guest"
I could reply rationally to that screed, but I'm just going to sit here and laugh at you instead.
Quote from: "Anti Defamation Association"
What is a screed? Hip me up dude. Do you mean like screeding cement, or that I am just too wordy for a little pseudo elitist like you. Do you have low self esteem.
Quote from: "psy"
I don't remember using that word, don't know what it means (if anything), and if I used it it was most likely a typo.
Quote from: "Guest"
I am getting confused on this deal who is speaking. And what the hell is all this jargon, like what is a thread, screed on so on?

I didn't use it either, Layne, but it's a great word... Fascinating how the word usage evolved from fragment to cement leveling tool. :D

    From
Merriam-Webster:

Main Entry: screed
Pronunciation: ?skr?d
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English screde fragment, alteration of Old English scr?ade — more at shred
Date: circa 1789

1 a : a lengthy discourse b : an informal piece of writing (as a personal letter) c : a ranting piece of writing
2 : a strip (as of a plaster of the thickness planned for the coat) laid on as a guide
3 : a leveling device drawn over freshly poured concrete[/list]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
-------------- • -------------- • --------------

Offline psy

  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 5606
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://homepage.mac.com/psyborgue/
Re: LAYNE MEACHAM and PROCTOR ADVOCATE, YES FAMILIES
« Reply #79 on: August 08, 2009, 09:18:24 PM »
Quote from: "Guest"
Quote from: "psy"
Quote from: "Anti Defamation Association"
HEY PSY, are you there?  My name is Anti Defamation and I am an alcoholic....now its your turn Psy, who are you and why are you here, be honest and brief.

I am here because I was placed in a facility on false pretenses based on false advertising.  

"Placed"??  You CHOSE to go. You were 18 years old! A legal adult!!


Quote
Quote
Come out of your hole and share.  Were you a kid in a program or not?

Yes.  Benchmark Young Adult School.

You weren't a kid in a program! You were an ADULT in a program! Big difference! You were able to walk out at any time!!

Only place I chose to go; only place I consented to was a "boarding school"...  I did not consent to quackery or thought reform which is exactly what I got.  Before making idiotic statements look up the definition of informed consent.

And leaving at any time?  Sorta, but without your identification, property, money, clothes, etc...  We were told we signed away our rights and at the time I believed it, as did many others.  It wasn't exactly a nice area to be on the streets in either, especially for kids who are "unable to emancipate", something Benchmark markets specifically towards.  Just ask Che Gookin about the gang brawl we witnessed the first night we were there.  Not a nice place to live.  Friend of mine was raped on the streets of Redlands after his parents stopped paying and the program dropped him on the streets.

But this is hardly the thread to discuss it.  If you want to bring this up I'd be glad to answer your questions in a seperate thread.  Otherwise I'll consider further discussion in this thread off-topic and not respond.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Benchmark Young Adult School - bad place [archive.org link]
Sue Scheff Truth - Blog on Sue Scheff
"Our services are free; we do not make a profit. Parents of troubled teens ourselves, PURE strives to create a safe haven of truth and reality." - Sue Scheff - August 13th, 2007 (fukkin surreal)

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
The Equalizer
« Reply #80 on: August 09, 2009, 10:28:54 AM »
Here is an old article from when Proctor Advocate was in its early stages, before Layne Meacham began running seriously afoul of the local authorities, and before the aforementioned lawsuits.

—•?|•?•0•?•|?•— —•?|•?•0•?•|?•— —•?|•?•0•?•|?•—

DESERET NEWS
THE UNORTHODOXY OF LAYNE MEACHAM
By Elaine Jarvik, Staff Writer
Published: Friday, Sept. 30, 1988 12:00 a.m. MDT


WHEN LAYNE MEACHAM was in junior high school he was expelled for stuffing marbles and balloons down the school's tuba. It was the sort of thing you might call a prank - if you hadn't spent years trying to make Layne Meacham behave.

He was the kind of boy who made a career out of defying authority. And in those days they locked kids like that up.He was sent to the State Industrial School in Ogden when he was 16. After he tried to escape they kept him in a room with a bed but no mattress. He was considered one of the most ungovernable of the most ungovernable boys in the state of Utah.

But that was then and this is now, a time that finds Meacham the head of a private program helping teenagers as troubled as he himself used to be. He's part of the establishment now.

Sort of. As Meacham would be the first to admit, he's still a troublemaker.

Consider, for example, the lawsuit Meacham has filed against the Utah Department of Social Services and the Division of Youth Corrections. Meacham is seeking a declaratory judgment that would give parents and his organization, Proctor Advocate, the right to determine who a child can associate with.

In other words, Meacham wants the right that every parent dreams of - the right to pick a kid's friends.

 Meacham's Proctor Advocate program currently works with 25 teenagers, ages 13 to 18. All of them, he says, can be diagnosed as having "conduct disorder," a set of behaviors that can best be summed up by that less clinical phrase "rotten."

These kids sluff school, get poor grades, are sometimes violent, defy authority, use drugs and are sexually active.

And these kids, says Meacham, "can work you to death. It's con-man stuff."

By the time their parents come to Meacham they have usually had the kids in one or more private hospitals, generally to treat the drug part of the problem. But the kids continue to use, and to defy. The parents come to Meacham because they've heard he takes matters into his own hands.

"They think of me as The Equalizer," he laughs.

The first thing Meacham does is have the parents give him in loco parentis rights over their child. Then he goes to pick up the kid. These are generally surly encounters, matched by Meacham's own stubbornness.

"I'm going to pick up a kid from the detention center on Wednesday. And he's going to think the same old rules apply. He'll say, 'When do I get out?' And I'll say, 'When do you turn 18?' "

He expects his kids to live for 45 days with a "proctor" family. He expects them to go to school, every period, and to get signatures from each teacher, every day. After they move back in with their parents, he expects them to come to Proctor Advocate every day except Sundays. On Sundays they are expected to attend either a religious service or a meeting of Alcoholics Anonymous. He expects them to stay in the program at least two years.

If they run away, he'll go after them. "I tell them, 'Do you understand? I'm not going to let you go. If you run to California, I'll go get you.'"

He'll go get them and he'll also sue their friends.

THE PROCTOR ADVOCATE building on 27th West looks like an unlikely place for global change. Located next door to AAA Forklift in a little one-story industrial park, the offices include a couple of sparsely furnished small front rooms and a big chilly warehouse room in the back.

On a Wednesday night recently, a half-dozen teenage girls sat around in the chilliness after a peer group meeting and talked about Proctor Advocate.

"I started using drugs when I was 8," one of the girls says, beginning a travelogue through the dark regions of her past. She used to sleep around. She ran away. She thought a lot about killing herself. She was put in the Rivendell Children and Youth Center Hospital for six months, a place she liked, she says. "But I broke their rules behind their backs." A month after getting out of the hospital, she was back to her old friends and back on drugs.

She's been in the Proctor Advocate program for nine months. "If you can make it through this program you can make it through anything," she says. "It's the toughest two years of your life. . . . You won't find anyone in this program who totally loves it."

What makes the program work, she says, is its insistence on keeping kids away from their old friends, and its focus on the "guided peer pressure" of the teen support groups. A kid is able to get through to other kids better than an adult can, she says.

She says all the girls in the program plan to go on to college.

"It probably looks like an LDS mutual meeting to you now," says Meacham later about the group's relative wholesomeness. "But I have claw marks on my arm from one girl. It's taken me 80 hours a week for a year to win them over."

Unlike most programs for troubled teems, Meacham bypasses professional therapy, relying instead on the ability of the teens to get each other in line.

Root causes of a kid's behavior don't concern Meacham anyway. "I don't care 'why.' I just say: 'Go to 5th period.' "

But he doesn't want his kids to totally lose the rebellious streak that makes them tenacious and creative. Re-channel those energies, he tells them. "If you like to argue, become an attorney."

"I try to keep them in the game till they can come up to bat."

Meacham charges $7,900 for the program (which can continue until a teen is 18, if the parents choose) compared to more than $10,000 for several months at a free-standing psychiatric hospital. He expects parents to attend Proctor Advocate parent meetings once a week and to attend a Tough Love or Al-Anon meeting once a week. He also expects them not to "rescue" their children.

"The only way a child fails is if a parent rescues or the system rescues."

Some people think he's a "power-hungry narcissist," he says. But he thinks of himself more like the grandfather in "Heidi" - gruff on the outside, kind underneath.

And of course also a troublemaker. "I like to be thrown into a stew of conflict and float to the top."


# # #
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
-------------- • -------------- • --------------

Offline psy

  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 5606
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://homepage.mac.com/psyborgue/
Re: LAYNE MEACHAM and PROCTOR ADVOCATE, YES FAMILIES
« Reply #81 on: August 09, 2009, 10:44:26 PM »
Ginger called me tonight and asked me to post a note to Meacham (she was not near a PC):

She asked me to relay that we have a public sector facilities section on fornits and if Meecham has any information about them it would be a welcome contribution.  "Give us what you got" was her exact words if I recall correctly.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Benchmark Young Adult School - bad place [archive.org link]
Sue Scheff Truth - Blog on Sue Scheff
"Our services are free; we do not make a profit. Parents of troubled teens ourselves, PURE strives to create a safe haven of truth and reality." - Sue Scheff - August 13th, 2007 (fukkin surreal)

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The community-based advantage
« Reply #82 on: August 10, 2009, 11:52:20 AM »
Quote from: "psy"
Ginger called me tonight and asked me to post a note to Meacham (she was not near a PC):

She asked me to relay that we have a public sector facilities section on fornits and if Meecham has any information about them it would be a welcome contribution.  "Give us what you got" was her exact words if I recall correctly.

Would I be correct in surmising that a lot of people saw the Seed and Straight, Inc. -- and still do see Seed/Straight spin-offs -- as "community-based alternatives" to pricey private treatment? Often the price ends up being pretty much the same, at least these days (maybe a bit less), but more importantly, it's still within the community. I imagine parents feel more fully involved on a day-to-day basis.

"Community-based alternative programs" would appear to be a outgrowth of attempts to reform and deinstitutionalize the juvenile justice system...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
-------------- • -------------- • --------------

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
deinstitutionalization efforts in Massachusetts and Utah
« Reply #83 on: August 10, 2009, 07:43:21 PM »
Here is an Abstract from the National Criminal Justice Reference Service which just happens to mention efforts at juvenile deinstitutionalization in the states of Massachusetts and Utah specifically (published the same year as the article "THE UNORTHODOXY OF LAYNE MEACHAM" of a couple posts back).

A photocopy of the full-length 54-page document can be ordered for a nominal fee. Alternatively, if you live near Rockville, MD, you can probably go there yourself to pick it up for free or close to it...

—•?|•?•0•?•|?•— —•?|•?•0•?•|?•— —•?|•?•0•?•|?•—

NCJ Number     114879
Title:    Out of Harm's Way: The Emancipation of Juvenile Justice
Author(s):    R J Margolis
Corporate Author(s):    Edna McConnell Clark Foundation
United States

Sponsoring Agency:    Edna McConnell Clark Foundation
New York, NY 10177
National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
US Dept of Justice

Sale:    US Dept of Justice
Law Enforcement Assistance Admin
Region 1
,
United States

National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States

Publication Date:    1988
Pages:    54
Type:    Issue overviews
Origin:    United States
Language:    English

Annotation:    This document examines the basic principles of juvenile deinstitutionalization, with special focus on its practice in Massachusetts and Utah.

Abstract:    Throughout its history, the juvenile justice system in the United States has been characterized by two approaches -- the first emphasizing restraint, regimentation, and retribution; the other characterized by a focus on individualization, self-actualization, and rehabilitation. Deinstitutionalization relies on fewer traditional constraints and on more open-door techniques. It envisions detention centers without locks, secure facilities without cells, halfway houses without guards, and, ultimately, communities without fear. In Massachusetts and Utah, about four-fifths of all children who end up in State custody manage to stay out of large institutions. Instead they are consigned to the care of a family, not always their own, and/or to one or more programs among a variety of deinstitutional offerings. Most of these programs are administered by private, nonprofit organizations on State contracts. Much deinstitutional care occurs in small group residences and neighborhood youth centers and through programs such as shelter care, outreach, tracking, proctor care, and youth services. In these States, even secure facilities bear marks of diversification and offer counseling, educational, and recreational services. While offering mixed results, studies of deinstitutional and community-based alternatives dispute assumptions of traditional penal approaches and indicate that deinstitutionalization can be an effective and humane alternative to reformatories and detention centers.

Main Term(s):    Community based corrections (juv)
Index Term(s):    Deinstitutionalization; Juvenile corrections effectiveness; Juvenile treatment methods; Massachusetts; Utah
     
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/app/publications/a ... ?ID=114879
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
-------------- • -------------- • --------------

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Re: The community-based advantage
« Reply #84 on: August 12, 2009, 06:10:05 PM »
Quote from: "Ursus"
Would I be correct in surmising that a lot of people saw the Seed and Straight, Inc. -- and still do see Seed/Straight spin-offs -- as "community-based alternatives" to pricey private treatment? Often the price ends up being pretty much the same, at least these days (maybe a bit less), but more importantly, it's still within the community. I imagine parents feel more fully involved on a day-to-day basis.

"Community-based alternative programs" would appear to be a outgrowth of attempts to reform and deinstitutionalize the juvenile justice system...

I think so, yeah. But it's disingenuous as hell, a real dirty trick. Even though the parents were on site most every day and involved in open meetings and raps afterward once or twice a week (once a month, minimum, for out of town parents) they were still kept in the dark to an amazing degree by various rules, practices and controls on communication. The kids were completely isolated from the outside world till 3rd phase (usually at least 3 or 4 months and often up to or exceeding a year) The parents were also discouraged by various means from keeping ties to anyone in their lives deemed not supportive of the program, including immediate family and spouses (soon to be ex spouses).

That was one of the more frustrating things about getting anyone to understand or believe us. Physically, we were located in the warehouse district of mid sized towns by day and housed in regular homes at night. But to call a Seed based program community based is laughable. Never the less, I bet a whole lot of people still buy into it.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The community-based advantage
« Reply #85 on: September 14, 2009, 10:13:05 AM »
Quote from: "Antigen"
Quote from: "Ursus"
Would I be correct in surmising that a lot of people saw the Seed and Straight, Inc. -- and still do see Seed/Straight spin-offs -- as "community-based alternatives" to pricey private treatment? Often the price ends up being pretty much the same, at least these days (maybe a bit less), but more importantly, it's still within the community. I imagine parents feel more fully involved on a day-to-day basis.

"Community-based alternative programs" would appear to be a outgrowth of attempts to reform and deinstitutionalize the juvenile justice system...
I think so, yeah. But it's disingenuous as hell, a real dirty trick. Even though the parents were on site most every day and involved in open meetings and raps afterward once or twice a week (once a month, minimum, for out of town parents) they were still kept in the dark to an amazing degree by various rules, practices and controls on communication. The kids were completely isolated from the outside world till 3rd phase (usually at least 3 or 4 months and often up to or exceeding a year) The parents were also discouraged by various means from keeping ties to anyone in their lives deemed not supportive of the program, including immediate family and spouses (soon to be ex spouses).

That was one of the more frustrating things about getting anyone to understand or believe us. Physically, we were located in the warehouse district of mid sized towns by day and housed in regular homes at night. But to call a Seed based program community based is laughable. Never the less, I bet a whole lot of people still buy into it.
I've read of the Kids Helping Kids program being described as community-based as well. I think the reliance on the "host homes" concept had a big part to do with that.

With that in mind, I found this wording in the above abstract quite interesting:

    "In Massachusetts and Utah, about four-fifths of all children who end up in State custody manage to stay out of large institutions. Instead they are consigned to the care of a family, not always their own, and/or to one or more programs among a variety of deinstitutional offerings."[/list]

    I think that the whole idea about "proctoring" is behind all this. Proctoring is, of course, another way of saying mentoring through the use of peer pressure, that is, a peer that is preselected with the desired mindset already in place. A more informal and up close and personal version of what was being done during the day in Group rap.
    « Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
    -------------- • -------------- • --------------

    Offline Anonymous

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 164653
    • Karma: +3/-4
      • View Profile
    Re: LAYNE MEACHAM and PROCTOR ADVOCATE, YES FAMILIES
    « Reply #86 on: October 04, 2009, 06:02:47 PM »
    Quote from: "psy"
    Two sentences explanation: My parents and I were having some rough times due to different opinions on religion, sexuality and politics.

    You expect that people will believe this crap? Are we supposed to believe the US government just hands out hundred thousand dollar scholarships to unnecessary rehab treatment because an adult child of a state dept employee has different views than his parents on religion, sexuality and politics? Really? What young adult doesn't have different views than their parents regarding religion, sexuality, and politics??? Yet they do not end up in programs. Something about this doesn't add up.
    « Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

    Offline Ursus

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 8989
    • Karma: +3/-0
      • View Profile
    LAYNE MEACHAM image
    « Reply #87 on: October 05, 2009, 10:54:00 AM »
    Getting back to the more pertinent topic at hand, here is an image of the man himself, originally posted by someone else in another thread. Perhaps Mr. Meacham could tell us a bit about the artist? Would this be a self-portrait, perchance?

    « Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
    -------------- • -------------- • --------------

    Offline Ursus

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 8989
    • Karma: +3/-0
      • View Profile
    The Miller Identity Obfuscation Trick
    « Reply #88 on: January 05, 2010, 10:39:26 AM »
    Quote from: "Anti Ambulance Chasing and citizens against parasites who look for Plaintiff's on Fornits"
    You have now mouthed Howard Polsky, Yitzhak, Jerome Miller and me and others who have genuinely tried to move the system along to be more humane.   Nobody knows what you want you are like little Armidinijads or something.  All you want to do is try to terrorize 'program' people as if they were lepers.   You want the immediate closure off all programs.  You have no alternative and you cannot back up your slanders.
    To clear up some potential confusion here, for anyone who is still reading along, there are two "Millers" mentioned in this thread: Miller Newton (of Straight, Inc. and Kids Helping Kids infamy), and Jerome Miller (of the Massachusetts Movement, who was the force behind closing all said state's reform schools down in the early 1970s).

    I bring this up again, since Mr. Meacham has repeatedly confused reference to the former with reference to the latter.

    And for good reason. Obviously the latter Miller, namely Jerome Miller, would be the more palatable of the two. And if ya want to pick a fight... what better way to obscure the issue than to throw in an identity conundrum?

    As it turns out, Layne Meacham has connections to both of them.
    « Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
    -------------- • -------------- • --------------

    Offline Ursus

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 8989
    • Karma: +3/-0
      • View Profile
    Last One Over The Wall, by Jerome Miller
    « Reply #89 on: January 05, 2010, 08:10:21 PM »
    Here's an old book review of Jerome Miller's Last One Over The Wall, a memoir of his attempts to turn the tide of juvenile reform from one of institutional solutions to community based ones:

    -------------- • -------------- • -------------- • --------------

    The New York Times
    Let His Children Go
    By David C. Anderson;
    Published: January 26, 1992


    LAST ONE OVER THE WALL: The Massachusetts Experiment in Closing Reform Schools. By Jerome G. Miller. 279 pp. Columbus: Ohio State University Press. $35.

    IT'S unlikely the people who hired Jerome Miller to take over the Massachusetts youth corrections system in 1969 realized what was in store. Before his departure under pressure after a tumultuous two-year term, Mr. Miller completed a radical social experiment: he closed down virtually all of the state's large reform schools, dispersing delinquent youngsters to a broad spectrum of community programs instead.

    The results were instructive. Researchers from Harvard University and the National Council on Crime and Delinquency confirmed that the closures produced no new crime wave while administering a welcome dose of humanity and common sense to the demoralized practice of juvenile justice. The rage that motivated Mr. Miller in Massachusetts burns as hotly today, as his lively memoir, "Last One Over the Wall: The Massachusetts Experiment in Closing Reform Schools," makes clear. Partly, no doubt, that is because the message of his achievement fell on politically deaf ears outside the Bay State, where the system he created remains substantially in place. Yet the questions it raises for a nation still beset by crime are more relevant than ever.

    Massachusetts hired Mr. Miller, then a psychiatric social worker on the faculty of Ohio State University, to head a new Department of Youth Services that had been created to reform juvenile justice in the wake of scandals involving abuse of youngsters in the state's gothic reform schools. Plenty of scandal remained as he arrived: teen-agers stripped naked and held for days in dark concrete cells, forced to drink from toilets, made to kneel for hours on a stone floor with pencils under their knees. In one sadistic ritual, the bastinado, Mr. Miller says, "A boy's feet were strapped to a bed frame and beaten on the bare soles with wooden paddles or the wooden backs of floor brushes."

    At first Mr. Miller sought to work within the system, replacing the more old-fashioned reform school directors and ordering more humanizing policies. He once ruled, for example, that a person ordering a youngster into an isolation cell had to sit with him in the cell until his release. "The rule effectively stopped use of isolation," he notes dryly.

    A staff revolt was predictable, but not, perhaps, the lengths to which some would go. Mr. Miller says that many reform school staff members allowed, even encouraged, youngsters to escape in hopes that news of the runaways would discredit his administration. On occasion, he claims, he found that the press had been conveniently notified of riots in institutions before they began.

    Frustration with such events fed Mr. Miller's belief that brutalizing institutions tend to protect and perpetuate themselves. "In bureaucracies with a captive clientele the pull is always away from the personal and toward the impersonal and alienating," he writes. "The pursuit is less one of public safety than of convenience. . . . [ Most ] humane administrators . . . eventually retreat to bureaucratic roles, trying to find peace in mitigating destructiveness."

    Unable to live with such a role, Mr. Miller made the audacious decision to do away with the big institutions altogether. He found legal (and sometimes, he admits, dubiously legal) loopholes that permitted him to take money from institutions, combine it with money from Federal grants and use it to fund alternative programs. Once the institutions were depopulated, the community agencies became a political constituency in their own right, substantial enough to challenge the institutional lobby. The Legislature agreed to close reform schools and leave them closed.

    The resulting system includes some small, secure programs for a handful of youngsters judged truly dangerous and a broad variety of programs -- everything from military schools and residential drug treatment to art schools and Outward Bound -- for the rest. The restructuring posed no threat to public safety. Massachusetts ranks 46th in juvenile crime among the 50 states. Recent research found a recidivism rate of 51 percent for youngsters in the community programs -- compared with 66 percent for those coming out of the old reform schools. Juveniles in the system account for only 1.3 percent of all arrests in the state.

    MR. MILLER'S experiment handsomely vindicated his belief that the United States grossly overstates the threat of juvenile delinquency. His most provocative chapter explores "the myth of 'violent' teen-agers." Though the public likes to blame crime waves on youngsters, he asserts, statistics tell another story. Of more than 20,000 homicides prosecuted annually, he says, only 500 result in juvenile convictions. Only 4 percent of juvenile arrests are for violent offenses. Closer examination of those violent acts in a recent year reveals that only 28 percent resulted in physical injury, and only 7 percent of the injuries required hospital treatment. Even allowing for the increasing mayhem of inner-city drug gangsters, serious violence remains a microscopic element of overall delinquency.

    Yet stereotypes of violent youth serve many agendas, Mr. Miller observes. "Those who run the juvenile justice system gain by defining young offenders as more violent than facts dictate. It's a kind of no-risk heroism for all concerned -- judges, superintendents, institutional staff, therapists, police and probation officers. . . . This is the correctional equivalent of the old psychiatric diagnosis of 'latent schizophrenia.' . . . If the patient improves, it can be chalked up to the therapist's skill at treatment. If, on the other hand, the patient deteriorates, the therapist looks even more sophisticated, having predicted it all along."

    Today Mr. Miller heads a nonprofit group that carries on his campaign against institutions and for more humane treatment of juvenile delinquents. That remains a lonely crusade, but the powerful lessons of Massachusetts make clear that it is hardly a waste of time.

      REFORM BY LAWSUIT

      Correctional reform in this country of lawyers and management experts has taken the form of setting minimum standards and ensuring that rules and regulations are well written and properly promulgated and enforced. Ignoring the possibilities of more basic reform, these actions try to mitigate abuse. Through a variety of suits . . . most states are under court order about or supervision over conditions in prisons and jails. Looking at the results, one wonders whether the effort was worth it. Court decisions have no doubt moderated harsh prison conditions and softened some of the grosser brutalities . . . [ but they have ] served to reinforce reliance on the failed institutional model as our primary correctional response to crime. -- From "Last One Over the Wall."[/list]

      David C. Anderson, a member of the editorial board of The New York Times, is the author of "Crimes of Justice: Improving the Police, the Courts, the Prisons."

      A version of this review appeared in print on January 26, 1992, on page 719 of the New York edition.


      Copyright 2010 The New York Times Company
      « Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
      -------------- • -------------- • --------------