Author Topic: Sue Scheff Releases New Book - Google Bomb  (Read 3863 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Sue Scheff Releases New Book - Google Bomb
« on: March 04, 2009, 09:27:31 PM »
Tuesday, March 3, 2009
Sue Scheff Announces Second Book - "Google Bomb!"

“GOOGLE BOMB” Take Cover! by John Dozier and Sue Scheff


Do you know what Google is saying about you?


Oh yes, it is almost here, my second book! This time around, I am honored to have co-author and Internet Specialist Attorney, John Dozier .


As my story of my landmark case of $11.3M jury verdict for damages unravels - many questions answers, John Dozier will bring us the legal landscape of today’s Cyber World - how to protect your online image and maintain a profile you are proud of! Have you thought about Internet Gossip vs Internet Fact? How do you know the difference? Don’t get caught in the web - read Google Bomb!


To compound our dynamic and explosive upcoming best seller - Michael Fertik, CEO and Founder of ReputationDefender will be writing the foreword! ReputationDefender is one of the pioneers in managing online reputations and helping keep your kids privacy safe online.


This timely book will offer you tools and remedies as well as a very compelling story that will keep you turning those pages! Remember, a 20 year reputation today can be destroyed within 20 minutes of vicious keystrokes.


Monkeys Don’t Fly? Do they? Ahhhh, just wait and you will see - the Internet has become its’ own animal. The Internet can be an educational tool - but - it can also be a lethal weapon!

Published by Health Communications Inc. (HCI) - Google Bomb will be released in Fall 2009.
Posted by Sue Scheff at 7:46 AM :deal:  :deal:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: Sue Scheff Releases New Book - Google Bomb
« Reply #1 on: March 04, 2009, 09:50:17 PM »
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anne Bonney

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5006
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Sue Scheff Releases New Book - Google Bomb
« Reply #2 on: March 04, 2009, 10:06:05 PM »
Sheeeeah!  Jeeeeeeeeeeeez, can you say biased???????????????????


Commenting on the book deal, Dozier said “I am thrilled to be working with HCI in telling the story of the attacks that are ruining people, their families, and their businesses overnight. It is gratifying to offer solutions that can really help people immediately. We are facing an onslaught of venom that is like a plague sweeping the country. It has to end. And it has to be stopped. It is time for a ‘tell all’, and Sue and I do just that. We want to change people’s lives so they don’t have to walk around looking over their shoulder.”
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
traight, St. Pete, early 80s
AA is a cult http://www.orange-papers.org/orange-cult.html

The more boring a child is, the more the parents, when showing off the child, receive adulation for being good parents-- because they have a tame child-creature in their house.  ~~  Frank Zappa

Offline Anne Bonney

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5006
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Sue Scheff Releases New Book - Google Bomb
« Reply #3 on: March 04, 2009, 10:10:19 PM »
Ah hell.....shoulda known........................


HCI is a pioneer in the self-help field with its roots in the life-changing Chicken Soup for the Soul, 101 Stories,
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
traight, St. Pete, early 80s
AA is a cult http://www.orange-papers.org/orange-cult.html

The more boring a child is, the more the parents, when showing off the child, receive adulation for being good parents-- because they have a tame child-creature in their house.  ~~  Frank Zappa

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Sue Scheff Releases New Book - Google Bomb
« Reply #4 on: March 04, 2009, 10:21:05 PM »
Quote from: "Anne Bonney"
Sheeeeah! Jeeeeeeeeeeeez, can you say biased???????????????????

And yet... the header above his blog reads (color emphasis mine):

    "Dozier Internet Law, PC

    John W. Dozier, Jr., Esq., President of Dozier Internet Law PC (PEER ratings: "AV" by Martindale Hubbell, "Legal Elite in Intellectual Property" by Virginia Business Magazine and Virginia Bar Association, "SuperLawyer" by Superlawyer Magazine, and member of the Bar Register of Preeminent Attorneys in the law of the Internet), offers an unbiased, balanced perspective on the Law of the Internet."

    http://johndozierjr.typepad.com/dozierinternetlaw/[/list]
    « Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
    -------------- • -------------- • --------------

    Offline Anonymous

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 164653
    • Karma: +3/-4
      • View Profile
    Re: Sue Scheff Releases New Book - Google Bomb
    « Reply #5 on: March 04, 2009, 10:27:45 PM »
    I am against programs but I got to side with Scheff on this one. You have to standup and defend yourself when people slander your reputation. She sued a program and did a lot of work to fight abuse. I know she refers kids to other programs and I hope she reconsiders doing that one day. But any one fighting abuse in programs in some way is on the right side. There's been enough divisiveness on this topic amongst various anti abuse advocates and that's a shame. People seem more willing to fight people on their own side than go after the people really doing the evil deeds. I got to wonder if this isn't just an internet hobby for most 'advocates' because Scheff is the only one I see out there on TV with regularity. Just because one program parent sued another one doesn't make me dismiss the good that they do. Let's all work together and stop criticizing each other and work against people on the other side who deserve the attention a lot more.
    « Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

    Offline Ursus

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 8989
    • Karma: +3/-0
      • View Profile
    Re: Sue Scheff Releases New Book - Google Bomb
    « Reply #6 on: March 04, 2009, 10:29:05 PM »
    His self-descriptive blurb says it all (color emphasis mine):


      Dozier Internet Law: My Two Cents (Sense?) Worth

      Welcome to the Dozier Internet Law blog, our little corner of the web. Online legal commentary is ultra-liberal and often fueled by prejudices and passions of the lawyer commentators and not reality. If you are looking for a balanced, well reasoned, realistic approach to the law of the web, and how to deal with and solve legal issues relating to online commerce, we offer that balance. Our law firm, Dozier Internet Law, represents business interests on the web. Sometimes we represent businesses that are victims of intellectual property theft or defamatory attacks, and just as often we represent recipients of "cease and desists" and lawsuit defendants. And if we are considered by some to be the thought leaders of the conservative, pro-business interests, then so be it. But at Dozier Internet Law you'll get the unbiased perspective and advice from highly seasoned and experienced Internet law experts. Visit us online at the Dozier Internet Law website or Dozier Internet Law on Defamation and Dozier Internet Law on Web Startups, both videos available through Youtube.com...[/list]
      « Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
      -------------- • -------------- • --------------

      Offline Anne Bonney

      • Newbie
      • *
      • Posts: 5006
      • Karma: +0/-0
        • View Profile
      Re: Sue Scheff Releases New Book - Google Bomb
      « Reply #7 on: March 04, 2009, 10:42:07 PM »
      Quote from: "Guest"
      I am against programs but I got to side with Scheff on this one. You have to standup and defend yourself when people slander your reputation.

      Slander/liable was never proven. She sued another program parent who was displaced by Hurricane Katrina at time of trial.  The defendant wasn't even served with Notice of Hearing, as they couldn't locate her and went to trial ANYWAY.  Sue Scheff "won" by default and it was bullshit at that as evidenced by the no-Notice.  Appalling.


       
      Quote
      She sued a program and did a lot of work to fight abuse.

      Bullshit!  She started bad-mouthing some programs in order to promote her "safe" programs that were ANYTHING BUT safe!!!

       
      Quote
      I know she refers kids to other programs and I hope she reconsiders doing that one day.

      Wow...I'm sure the kids she's had a part in shipping off hope she reconsiders too.   ::)   :twofinger:

      Quote
      But any one fighting abuse in programs in some way is on the right side.

      That's preposterous.

      Quote
      There's been enough divisiveness on this topic amongst various anti abuse advocates and that's a shame. People seem more willing to fight people on their own side than go after the people really doing the evil deeds. I got to wonder if this isn't just an internet hobby for most 'advocates' because Scheff is the only one I see out there on TV with regularity.

      Bwahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.  She's the only one on TV!!!!    :roflmao:  :roflmao:  :roflmao:  :roflmao:  :roflmao:  :roflmao:  :roflmao:  :roflmao:  :roflmao:   Yeah, that matters.    Wow.



      Quote
      Just because one program parent sued another one doesn't make me dismiss the good that they do. Let's all work together and stop criticizing each other and work against people on the other side who deserve the attention a lot more.


      Bite. My. Ass.
       :fuckoff:  :moon:
      « Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
      traight, St. Pete, early 80s
      AA is a cult http://www.orange-papers.org/orange-cult.html

      The more boring a child is, the more the parents, when showing off the child, receive adulation for being good parents-- because they have a tame child-creature in their house.  ~~  Frank Zappa

      Offline Anonymous

      • Newbie
      • *
      • Posts: 164653
      • Karma: +3/-4
        • View Profile
      Re: Sue Scheff Releases New Book - Google Bomb
      « Reply #8 on: March 04, 2009, 10:52:16 PM »
      Quote from: "Anne Bonney"
      Quote from: "Guest"
      I am against programs but I got to side with Scheff on this one. You have to standup and defend yourself when people slander your reputation.

      Slander/liable was never proven. She sued another program parent who was displaced by Hurricane Katrina at time of trial.  The defendant wasn't even served with Notice of Hearing, as they couldn't locate her and went to trial ANYWAY.  Sue Scheff "won" by default and it was bullshit at that as evidenced by the no-Notice.  Appalling.


       
      Quote
      She sued a program and did a lot of work to fight abuse.

      Bullshit!  She started bad-mouthing some programs in order to promote her "safe" programs that were ANYTHING BUT safe!!!

       
      Quote
      I know she refers kids to other programs and I hope she reconsiders doing that one day.

      Wow...I'm sure the kids she's had a part in shipping off hope she reconsiders too.   ::)   :twofinger:

      Quote
      But any one fighting abuse in programs in some way is on the right side.

      That's preposterous.

      Quote
      There's been enough divisiveness on this topic amongst various anti abuse advocates and that's a shame. People seem more willing to fight people on their own side than go after the people really doing the evil deeds. I got to wonder if this isn't just an internet hobby for most 'advocates' because Scheff is the only one I see out there on TV with regularity.

      Bwahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.  She's the only one on TV!!!!    :roflmao:  :roflmao:  :roflmao:  :roflmao:  :roflmao:  :roflmao:  :roflmao:  :roflmao:  :roflmao:   Yeah, that matters.    Wow.



      Quote
      Just because one program parent sued another one doesn't make me dismiss the good that they do. Let's all work together and stop criticizing each other and work against people on the other side who deserve the attention a lot more.


      Bite. My. Ass.
       :fuckoff:  :moon:

      Wow, you're kind of mean, aren't you? I'm not going to bother responding since it's obvious you aren't interested in dialogue, you are just trying to start an argument. Sorry but you'll have to find someone else to play your games, I have better things to do. Try being more respectful next time and I might respond, geeze louise..........
      « Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

      Offline Anne Bonney

      • Newbie
      • *
      • Posts: 5006
      • Karma: +0/-0
        • View Profile
      Re: Sue Scheff Releases New Book - Google Bomb
      « Reply #9 on: March 04, 2009, 10:53:24 PM »
      I expected as much.  Par for the course for your kind.
      « Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
      traight, St. Pete, early 80s
      AA is a cult http://www.orange-papers.org/orange-cult.html

      The more boring a child is, the more the parents, when showing off the child, receive adulation for being good parents-- because they have a tame child-creature in their house.  ~~  Frank Zappa

      Offline Ursus

      • Newbie
      • *
      • Posts: 8989
      • Karma: +3/-0
        • View Profile
      Re: Sue Scheff Releases New Book - Google Bomb
      « Reply #10 on: March 04, 2009, 11:27:36 PM »
      Quote from: "Guest"
      She sued a program and did a lot of work to fight abuse. I know she refers kids to other programs and I hope she reconsiders doing that one day. But any one fighting abuse in programs in some way is on the right side.

      I think if you didn't know anything about Sue Scheff, it might well look that way at first glance. But Sue's "work" against abuse is PURE-ly incidental to her real modus operandi, namely self-promotion and greed for getting her share of the pie in the TTI.

      As such, any "good" cannot really be trusted, since it could well be reversed at any moment, depending on which way the wind blows in her jockeying for prime recognition as "a being of importance" and in the slandering of her "enemies."
      « Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
      -------------- • -------------- • --------------

      Offline psy

      • Administrator
      • Newbie
      • *****
      • Posts: 5606
      • Karma: +2/-0
        • View Profile
        • http://homepage.mac.com/psyborgue/
      Re: Sue Scheff Releases New Book - Google Bomb
      « Reply #11 on: March 05, 2009, 04:49:57 AM »
      Need I remind how Sue has libeled me, Ginger, Shelby Earnshaw, Joyce Harris, Carey Bock,  and the list goes on and on and on.  On the other side, on sites like mine ( sueschefftruth.com ) there is only truthful information (and opinion) about her.
      « Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
      Benchmark Young Adult School - bad place [archive.org link]
      Sue Scheff Truth - Blog on Sue Scheff
      "Our services are free; we do not make a profit. Parents of troubled teens ourselves, PURE strives to create a safe haven of truth and reality." - Sue Scheff - August 13th, 2007 (fukkin surreal)

      Offline try another castle

      • Registered Users
      • Newbie
      • *
      • Posts: 2693
      • Karma: +0/-0
        • View Profile
      Re: Sue Scheff Releases New Book - Google Bomb
      « Reply #12 on: March 05, 2009, 05:04:07 AM »
      Quote
      I know she refers kids to other programs and I hope she reconsiders doing that one day.

      Actually, she continues to refer kids to the programs she apparently had such an issue with.. i.e. WWASPS. So, when you say "other", you mean "the exact same program" then you are right.


      I think this whole issue should be filed under "massive, whiny butthurt"


      and if calling someone to the carpet for being a liar is libel.. well... we're all screwed.
      « Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

      Offline psy

      • Administrator
      • Newbie
      • *****
      • Posts: 5606
      • Karma: +2/-0
        • View Profile
        • http://homepage.mac.com/psyborgue/
      Re: Sue Scheff Releases New Book - Google Bomb
      « Reply #13 on: March 05, 2009, 05:07:41 AM »
      Quote from: "try another castle"
      Quote
      I know she refers kids to other programs and I hope she reconsiders doing that one day.

      Actually, she continues to refer kids to the programs she apparently had such an issue with.. i.e. WWASPS. So, when you say "other", you mean "the exact same program" then you are right.

      That was true at one point (she was WWASP's referral queen), but I don't think it is anymore.  Still.  Whitmore Academy, her favorite program to refer to, was cited by the GAO as the worst of the worst.
      « Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
      Benchmark Young Adult School - bad place [archive.org link]
      Sue Scheff Truth - Blog on Sue Scheff
      "Our services are free; we do not make a profit. Parents of troubled teens ourselves, PURE strives to create a safe haven of truth and reality." - Sue Scheff - August 13th, 2007 (fukkin surreal)

      Offline Anonymous

      • Newbie
      • *
      • Posts: 164653
      • Karma: +3/-4
        • View Profile
      Re: Sue Scheff Releases New Book - Google Bomb
      « Reply #14 on: March 05, 2009, 05:23:50 PM »
      http://www.cybertriallawyer.com/defamation-lawyers


      Defamation Lawyers for Web Business

      Interested in the latest lawsuits filed? Visit Dozier Internet Law on Defamation.
      And don't forget to keep up with the breaking issues of the day. View our youtube.com videos dealing with online defamation: Dozier Internet Law on Defamation - Introduction; Dozier Internet Law - Big Five; Dozier Internet Law - Next Five; Dozier Internet Law - Don Morris' Perspectives; and Dozier Internet Law - Why Addressing Online Defamation is Important.

      Top Ten Blogger Personas: The Mobosphere Unveiled

      Ever since Congress passed Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act giving immunity to interactive service providers for publishing the defamation of others, a wide range of characters has arisen and infiltrated the mainstream blogosphere. Instead of becoming a source for obtaining reliable information, the blogosphere, and user generated content, is at risk of becoming a less credible information source. Dozier Internet Law defamation lawyers are constantly battling these "black hat" forces and over the past several years we have acquired quite an insight into this underworld; an anonymous and covert society bent on terrorizing businesses. These are our internal thoughts on the matter, and not scientific analyses. We are not psychiatrists; just defamation lawyers and trial lawyers trained for almost fifty years to figure out the human nature of clients, witnesses, and juries.

      All too often blog attacks are simply protection rackets and extortion schemes in disguise. We have been working on documenting the organizational structure and operational methodologies used by these racketeers. For now, let's take a look at the entire panoply of characters we seem, as business defamation lawyers, to run into. For those businesses under attack, it is essential that you first identify the publisher's persona and motivation before beginning to identify the proper strategies for addressing his often seemingly legitimate posts. We don't go into details on how we work with clients to deal with each type of personality, but the tools vary considerably from being passive, to utilizing SEO services, to implementing reputation management initiatives, to pre-litigation and lawsuit actions.

      Defamation Lawyers Pursue Bloggers

      1. Pickpocket
        This is the guy who used to wait on street corners for elderly ladies to pass. He enjoys attacking defenseless people and stealing covertly using deception. This type of blogger will steal your copyright protected content, have the search engines push your prospective clients to his site, and then run ads and otherwise direct the traffic to your competitors. He could be an affiliate marketer for a competitor getting a share of the revenue, or he could simply be running Google or Yahoo ads on his site. Pickpockets also take great pleasure in stealing your trademarks...surreptitiously using your mark in hidden tags, meta tags, hidden redirect pages, or through a myriad of search engine optimization techniques, all in the hopes of re-directing your prospects to a competitor and taking money from you.
      2. Wacko
        We usually identify a wacko situation quickly. There are distinctive characteristics of his communications. The wacko is usually a "follower", someone looking to gain attention and recognition, but escalates what may have started as fair criticism into more and more outrageous claims. Most sophisticated business people immediately view the poster as a "nut case", particularly when an excessive amount of time or energy disproportionate to the merits of the subject is expended. But it is not easy for the typical browser on the web to see the pattern, usually spread over multiple web properties.
      3. Druggie
        Or, maybe "liquid courage" would be more appropriate. This guy is exactly what comes to mind. During the day this blogger is a normal guy, but at night he returns to the sanctity of his home, gets drunk or high, and goes out on the web looking for "hook-ups" and blogging on his "hang-ups". This guy is hard to detect as a fraudster, and sometimes won't recall what he said online the next day while under the influence. He posts aggressive, false and arbitrary attacks on whatever issue of the day (or night) catches his fancy.
      4. Alien
        No, not from another world. But from overseas. In a far, far away place, without any treaty with the US, in a country without an effective legal system and no notion of business or personal property ownership rights. Many of these types operate out of certain Russian provinces, but the blogs, postings and communications appear to be from the customer down the street. This individual usually has an ulterior motive, often working with the criminal discussed below. He has no fear, until he takes a vacation to Turkey and US federal agents grab him for extradition, which is exactly what happened on a case in the not so recent past.
      5. Nerd
        This is the guy who is scared to talk with a girl, but behind the keyboard, all alone, morphs into a Casanova. This empowerment of anonymity creates an omnipotent persona, and for the first time the nerd feels the effect of power and control, gets an adrenaline buzz when he exercises it, and he exercises it often, usually creating or perpetuating a volatile situation in which he feels he can outsmart the "opposition". There is no principle involved. His blog postings are all about the adrenaline. It is hard to know if you are dealing with this type online...his posts are intelligent and on their face credible. But, once you identify the nerd blogger, he cowers and goes away, usually forever.
      6. Rookie
        Enjoy debating a thirteen year old? They are out on the net acting like adults, posting statements and play-acting like a grown-up. The challenge, of course, is that most people reading the posts have no idea these are coming from a kid. The tip off can be the utter immaturity of the posts, but most often the kids can sound credible criticizing, for instance, a CPA's method of calculating RIO on REIT holdings, because they can mimic earlier posts. There is no insidious motive here; just kids having fun as the hormones kick in. But the readers of the blog posting don't know that.
      7. Sadist
        This person attacks others, causes pain, and revels in the results in ways not worthy of mention. He loves to create, direct, control, and unleash a firestorm of criticism about a company just to create pain and damage. This type of person may often by the prime instigator of the online attacks, and tightens the noose by escalating the attack rapidly, almost as if in an obsessive state. You will find a sadist going to many sites and blogging, and he usually lets you know it was him because he uses his real moniker. He has characteristics of a stalker, and he is most likely to be the one that starts recommending direct physical violence against the executives of a company. This person is not motivated by money, but by the pure enjoyment of pain being visited upon innocent parties.
      8. Bankrupt
        No, not morally bankrupt. Actually bankrupt...no money, no assets, no prospects for work, and nothing to lose. These bloggers post without fear of the consequences or any regard for the truth because you "can't get blood out of a turnip", you "can't get water from a rock", and all these other sayings handed down, we surmise, through his generations. This is usually not a smart guy, but his postings are damaging and inflammatory. Many will own and control blogs without any concern about the consequences of liabilities that might arise through the perpetuation and "enhancement" of posts, and sometimes will post to their own blog and act like it was from a third party.
      9. Criminal
        Career criminals, no less. Like the convicted felon running a sophisticated extortion scheme against a very prominent business. Or the owner of an open blog avoiding service of process with guard dogs protecting his compound. The thieves and crooks of the world are online today; and the criminals often have both an organization and a highly effective and surprisingly coordinated operational plan in place to target a business. Rumors of $500,000 a year payoffs seem to promote this problem, which emanates from more of a "mobosphere" than the blogosphere.
      10. Mis-Leader
        This person is in no manner a leader. This blogger has a hidden agenda, but he just makes it sound like he is a totally objective commentator. He can create an appearance of authority and the casual visitor to his blog does not question the legitimacy. This type of persona is hard to figure out. One of the most pervasive practices is to control a blog and allow negative posts against all except his generous advertisers. Another common technique involves omission; not disclosing conflicts of interest or the existence of a business or personal relationship because the readers of the blog would totally discount the commentator's posts as unreliable and biased.

      Dozier Internet Law Defamation Lawyers

      In closing, most of the blogosphere is legitimate, offers honest opinions and comments that add value to an open dialogue, and is an excellent example of the exercise of constitutionally protected free speech. As business defamation lawyers, we seen another side. The "mobosphere", on the other hand, operates outside of the spotlight and often uses reckless, irresponsible, false and defamatory statements for personal or professional gain, all too often focused on self gratification and pecuniary benefits. As businesses attempt to leverage user generated content ("UGC") into a valuable tool in the Web 2.0 environment, the proliferation of the scofflaws interrupting the free flow of credible speech in the online world puts at risk the reputation and integrity of UGC and raises the very real risk that consumers will begin viewing web content with disdain and suspicion.

      Dozier Internet Law defamation lawyers offer a free consultation to qualified businesses and professionals undergoing attacks from the scofflaws of the web.
         
      Quote
      Dozier Internet Law Firm Computer Keyboard Photograph

      "Thank goodness for John and his team. With their trial record, technology expertise, and legal and business perspective, they have been a godsend...."

      — Internet Content Company CEO.
       
      Dozier Internet Law P. C.
         

      Return to the Top | Home | Attorneys and Professionals | Consultation
      Contact Us | Do I Need Local Counsel? | Site Map | User Agreement/Privacy Policy | Administration (authorization required)


      © Copyright 2001-2008. All Rights Reserved. Dozier Internet Law, P.C.
      « Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »