One of you anony"asses" wrote:
i just thought you should know there is always 2 sides to a story, and you dont know all the history either.
Yes, there is ALWAYS two sides to a story. The fact that I, nor most of the other readers here are privy to all the history between you two factions, is precisely the point I made, to support my opinion- this is NOT the appropriate place to continue the fued. Not unless you and your "group" all want to come forward with who you are and tell your stories in complete. Until then, your comments are highly suspect.
The difference between you (and your "group") and Carey- Her story is very public, she doesn't post her opinions and imaginings anonymously. Anyone can check out her story, her character, what her personal motives MIGHT be. I appreciate and respect that. She is willing to subject herself to public scrutiny.
No one is allowed to make an accusation about another "anonymously" in court. The accusers character and motives must be considered as well. Get the point.
And:
i am glad carey has a friend in you but i for one with many others have been burned by her so called desire to tell the truth.
May be you have been burned by Carey's actions and may be you haven't. We'll never know because no one knows you or your story. Your anonymous words have no validity. Carey and I aren't "friends", we've never met, but I would enjoy that. I happen to respect her for the reasons I have stated in other posts. And I'm not going to sit back and watch this without putting in my two cents worth. Okay, maybe it's a quarter's worth.
And:
yes we, there is a big group of anti wwaspers and carey thinks of us as rich dumb parents.
May be you are, may be you aren't. Expose yourself and your group, and let the fine people here, who you continuously bombard with your opinions and anti-Carey comments, decide for themselves. There may be some validity to her "dumb" accusation, if you all think anyone here will take your accusations seriously when we know nothing about you.
If there is anyone who should be banned, it is those who post anonymously, attacking others
without supporting their imaginings and accusations with evidence.
And all current evidence points to the group of "rich dumb parents" (your words, not mine) being those who support Sue. What other "group" has issues with Carey?
Logical deduction has its benefits.
So, Sue, are you willing to post your story here and sign your name to it? Are you willing to respond to the accusations Carey made about you? Are you willing to expose your reasoning behind ousting here from the message board, or refusing to post her story at your website, etc, etc? Are you willing to answer questions from this group?
Or will you and your "groupies" just continue to take up space here, with what appears to be an attempt to divide and conquer.
All action taken against WWASP and any other facility operating outside the law and without public scrutiny is worthwhile. If you all have a different strategy, then go for it. But don't be piddling around here making vague accusations and anonymously slandering another person's character. It's quiet disgusting. And if you all are who logical deduction points to you being, you have lost any shread of respect that I might have had for you.
Contribute something positive to the effort here, or go do your own anti-WWASP thing, while supporting other "questionable" programs. I personally feel "Ed Con" is appropriate for this line of work.
You CON parents out of their money. You CON parents into believe that you have their child's best interest at heart. You CON parents into believing you have an inkling of knowing about what their child will endure on a day-to-day basic in any given program. You CON parents when you refer to programs that don't have the minimum protection in place- being properly registered and licensed with the state. Now, you're here trying to CON us into believing Carey is crazy. Won't work. Put up, or shut up.
Deborah
