Seemed Like a Good Idea

[TheWho]

I didn't know that there were reviews of unlicensed private jails available.  Is there a section in the newspaper where one would find these reviews, like movie reviews?  After dozens of posts, no one has explained what the stated 85% success rate means.  A program that claims that abstinence is the only means to recovery yet has shown a minimum relapse rate of 52% amongst graduates in their study is not 85% successful at producing abstinence in their grads.  But keep throwing up that unqualified figure of 85%.  Then tell us again that success is determined by the individual, although AARC is determining it for their study population.  Thanks again, Who.

Yes they have, you just dont want to listen.

[Anonymous]

I didn't know that there were reviews of unlicensed private jails available.  Is there a section in the newspaper where one would find these reviews, like movie reviews?  After dozens of posts, no one has explained what the stated 85% success rate means.  A program that claims that abstinence is the only means to recovery yet has shown a minimum relapse rate of 52% amongst graduates in their study is not 85% successful at producing abstinence in their grads.  But keep throwing up that unqualified figure of 85%.  Then tell us again that success is determined by the individual, although AARC is determining it for their study population.  Thanks again, Who.

Yes they have, you just dont want to listen.

jn

[Anonymous]

So, again, what are you doing, Who?

He's leading you around in circles attempting to tire you out.  Even if you win an argument with him, he'll raise the same one in a page or two (knowing that most casual readers won't bother to look back).

My advice is to completely ignore him (click on his username and add him as a "foe").  If you do that, he goes away.  Or you can categorize your responses to his most common arguments into a faq and simply post a link to the appropriate answer in each of your responses (so you don't have to repeat yourself).