Author Topic: I dont think...  (Read 3436 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nihilanthic

  • Posts: 3931
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: I dont think...
« Reply #15 on: March 07, 2008, 07:22:52 PM »
Prove a program works and we can start.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
DannyB on the internet:I CALLED A LAWYER TODAY TO SEE IF I COULD SUE YOUR ASSES FOR DOING THIS BUT THAT WAS NOT POSSIBLE.

CCMGirl on program restraints: "DON\'T TAZ ME BRO!!!!!"

TheWho on program survivors: "From where I sit I see all the anit-program[sic] people doing all the complaining and crying."

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: I dont think...
« Reply #16 on: March 09, 2008, 12:03:24 AM »
Quote from: "Anne Bonney"
Quote from: "Hinni"
Parents fought hard for due process and like the person above stated, we do have that now for our kids.  If parents take the extra time they need get outside help they can figure out which places are not good for there kid and find a good placement.

No, the KIDS need to have due process, not the parents OVER the kids.

Silly Whobit

(I'm guessing)

Well, good luck with that. I'd say the likelihood of children getting the full rights of adults is right up there with lowering the voting and drinking age to six.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline wdtony

  • Posts: 852
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://www.pfctruth.com
Re: I dont think...
« Reply #17 on: March 09, 2008, 05:33:54 AM »
[/quote]

 It's like playing russian roulette with your kid's psyche, only the odds are a bit worse.  If a program fits the warning signs on isaccorp.org, run the other way.
[/quote]

(russian roulette) Good analogy.

I also agree with the other posters about naming a so-called "good program". Without the name of this program, I don't see any reason to discuss anything.

It seems logical that anyone who is genuine about helping teens and suggesting that there are good programs in existence has conducted a tremendous amount of research to support this claim. If this person cannot name one (good) program, I am inclined to believe they are either in support of specific bad programs or are just incredibly ignorant about this subject. The latter doesn't make sense due to the passion involved with this subject. Would it be irrational to deduce that this is a (specific bad program supporter) attempting to cloud the subject matter pertaining to programs in general?

All other arguments are futile. I have searched extensively and have found no evidence of a good program. I have, however, found widespread evidence of brainwashing in programs especially within the time-frame of the first weeks or months in the programs. Lack of communication to parents or to the outside world including an attorney ad-litem is the largest warning sign I have found in every case.

T
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Pathway Family Center Truth = http://www.pfctruth.com

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: I dont think...
« Reply #18 on: July 01, 2008, 08:24:55 PM »
there are no good programs! only good parents
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Nihilanthic

  • Posts: 3931
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: I dont think...
« Reply #19 on: July 01, 2008, 11:05:02 PM »
Still waiting on a good program...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
DannyB on the internet:I CALLED A LAWYER TODAY TO SEE IF I COULD SUE YOUR ASSES FOR DOING THIS BUT THAT WAS NOT POSSIBLE.

CCMGirl on program restraints: "DON\'T TAZ ME BRO!!!!!"

TheWho on program survivors: "From where I sit I see all the anit-program[sic] people doing all the complaining and crying."