Another fun thing you can do to help fuck with prohibitionist types is to call the "Anonymous Snitch Line" in your locale and inform them about the marijuana plants growing in the back yard of the house belonging to the local chief of police, the mayor, program parents, and other vocal prohibitionists. Tell them about the meth lab in the garage, too.
I was gonna say this.... but I got high. lol
The [Stanford] experiment was widely criticized for being unscientific. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think the experiment was totally flawed, but I just don’t think it can be used in comparison to TBS’s or wilderness.
Except that people placed in this sort of unscientific, contrived, extreme totalitarian experiment keep having various kinds of breakdowns and psyche troubles. And, for some damned reason, in neither case do the people running the show ever learn from experience and come to expect the inevitable.
Another often made comparison is to the methods used to break and control pows of overt war (as opposed to culture war). Two major differences there, that I know of. First, in an overt war, all parties are aware that the captors really don't care if the captives die whereas the troubled parent industry has to at least hold up the appearance, however implausible, that they're first interest is the
welfare of the captive. At least to the parents and public and, to some extent, themselves. The captives don't have to be in on that illusion. In fact it helps the process if they're convinced that they may very well die or suffer serious permanent harm (need not be physical). That's part of the definition of torture.
The other is, of course, that POWs of overt war can buoy their spirits with the knowledge that their families back home are on their side. They never get the "Having a blast spending your college fund in Hawaii without you. Haven't missed you at all. Now comply with your captors and maybe we'll be willing to talk to you again some day."