Should Sue related threads get moved to PURE/sue/caca forum?

[psy]

It's getting a bit cluttered in the TTI.  What do people think?

[Anonymous]

It would be good for them to all be under one forum.  It is easier to keep up with was is going on with.

However, sometimes things like Focal Point get posted in teen help forum because the original poster doesnt' realize when the discussion starts out that they are issues dealing with Sue or any of her croanies are apart of it.  As a matter of fact I didn't realize Focal Point forum had anything to due with Scheff until the law suit hit the net.

I just don't want to miss something by assuming everything related to them is always going to be posted under PURE and Caica

[Anonymous]

Well - considering the sum of the posts appears to be that Sue Scheff's daughter is now WORKING in the industry for a program her mother (PURE) apparently refers to, I can think of another forum that might also qualify:  The ED CON forum.

2nd, this revelation is sure to expand and spin off into other threads and blogs, so I think it's probably just as well that it started off in TT.  

Point is, what do people think of this child working for a program and apparently, promoting her mother's business, book, their combined story, etc. but not disclosing that she works for a program?

And what is Iz's connection to the Scheff family and this school, Harbor Oaks?

How many WWASPS kids have been placed there?

Is there more to this story?

[Deborah]

One thing that would help is to not have multiple posts on the same issue. Post in the same thread instead of starting a new one.

[Anonymous]

At least change the description that says this is an unmoderated forum then.

[hanzomon4]

A little clean up ain't moderation per se, go for it if you think it will aid the discussion... i.e. make it easier to follow and understand. This will also spare Waygookin an aneurysm me thinks...

[Deborah]

Example: All of these could be in one thread insted of 4- same subject.

http://wwf.fornits.com/viewtopic.php?t=22994
http://wwf.fornits.com/viewtopic.php?t=22999
http://wwf.fornits.com/viewtopic.php?t=22993
http://wwf.fornits.com/viewtopic.php?t=22998

[3xsaSeedling]

Anything that puts her in the limelight works for me.  Want to know where she is and what she's doing as much as possible; makes it harder for anyone to sneak.            
What does She do?  Fish for places that suit her needs and just keep hopping around each time she gets 'flushed'? ::seg::

"...appears to be that Sue Scheff's daughter is now WORKING in the industry for a program her mother (PURE)...".  This is 'news' to y'all?  Careful w/her.  She IS "her mother's daughter".


Could this ALL go under 'PURE Bullshit'?  I LOVE that title ::seg::

[Anonymous]

This is unmoderated forurm so who cares?

[Anonymous]

Moving people's threads around is moderation. The moderators artificially create interest in threads with stickies, and hide others by placing them in less-viewed forums or similar threads. If you are going to moderate, just say so. But don't ban the who, and let him back in on some righteous claim that this forum is the mother of free speech forums.

[TheWho]

Depends on your intent.  If it is just housecleaning then moving it to a place where it is all together, like the “pureâ€

[Anonymous]

Moving people's threads around is moderation. The moderators artificially create interest in threads with stickies, and hide others by placing them in less-viewed forums or similar threads. If you are going to moderate, just say so. But don't ban the who, and let him back in on some righteous claim that this forum is the mother of free speech forums.

There aren't very many stickies and that's just to keep the 'meat' of the issue in one place.  No one is "artificially creating interest in threads" or "hiding" anything.  That's Sue and Izzy's job.  Nothing is perfect, but this forum is the closest thing there is to completely free speech.

[Anonymous]

Who decides what is the meat of the issue?

Who decides what is important enough to remain in the TTI forum, and what will be relegated to the internet equivalent of a  "free speech zone", a out of the way dark corner people can protest to their heart's content but nobody will see it.

If the forum isn't perfect free speech then why let theWho back in? That was done on purely idealogical grounds so why would you expect people not to hold this forum to the standard from that point on?

This is about people trying to implement control and mold fornits into what they want it to be, it happened before. TSW went sticky and organizational crazy when he was admin, it happens every time someone is given the power and the reorganize according to their own beliefs on priority. That ain't free speech.The who said his posts were altered, now exactly free speech is it? See how ridiculous it is when subscriping to a strict ideology? It's so easy for us to poke holes through it.

[psy]

Who decides what is the meat of the issue?

Who decides what is important enough to remain in the TTI forum, and what will be relegated to the internet equivalent of a  "free speech zone", a out of the way dark corner people can protest to their heart's content but nobody will see it.

If the forum isn't perfect free speech then why let theWho back in? That was done on purely idealogical grounds so why would you expect people not to hold this forum to the standard from that point on?

This is about people trying to implement control and mold fornits into what they want it to be, it happened before. TSW went sticky and organizational crazy when he was admin, it happens every time someone is given the power and the reorganize according to their own beliefs on priority. That ain't free speech.The who said his posts were altered, now exactly free speech is it? See how ridiculous it is when subscriping to a strict ideology? It's so easy for us to poke holes through it.

I'm not going crazy at all.  I'm just posting a poll to see what the popular opinion would be.  Although the vote seems to be unanimously in favor of moving the threads, based on the response, i don't think it's a good idea to move the threads.

As for Priority?  have you checked out my sig recently, or my new blog?
 ::bangin::

[Rachael]

In my opinion, we are giving Sue Scheff far too much power by concentrating so bloody much on her and PURE and all the rest to the negligence of other issues. I think it is extremely important to keep track of her and what she's doing, but that in no way should that be allowed to get in the way of other equally important things like Hepzibah House and Peninsula Village, etc. I think that the overwhelming number of SS threads on the TTI forum is not productive, and I for one am less likely to pay attention to the other threads when they're blocked by so much SS chatter. However, at the same time, all of the SS threads can't just be condensed so easily. It is important to maintain the distinction about the many facets of the SS problem (Carey Bock, WWASPs trial, etc, etc.). And particularly in light of recent events (the direct attack on fornits), it is important to keep SS at the forefront of our minds. But, I think it does a disservice to all those interested to attempt to keep the thread count down.

As far as I'm concerned, the best possible solution allows us to focus on the myriad of facilities, and all the associated discussions about them as well as maintaining the discussion re: SS in its entirety. That being said, I would like to see SS threads kept in the SS forum. Of course, as someone mentioned, the problem is making sure people looking for information can find it. To encourage that, a sticky could be created directing all SS and PURE issues to the apporpriate forum.


But that's just me.