What sort of problem might arise if it is discovered that any of the victims in the Turley lawsuit against WWASP were transported to their "abusive WWASP FACILITY" by Sunrise Adolescent Transport?
It is reported that Sunrise Adolescent Transport is owned by Julie Thompson, a former employee of WWASP's TEEN HELP.
Isabelle Zehnder seems to be very involved in the Turley lawsuit. Since Zehnder's own email reveals that she referred to Sunrise Adolescent Transport, which reportedly transports children to WWASP facilities--is this some sort of "conflict of interest?"
I would like to once again, try to explain that Izzy and Sue have nothing to do with this law suit. If they want to advertise it, and act like they are the big wheels rolling it, there isn't anything much that can be done to stop them. But you all ought to know - these two are not about honesty and full disclosure. They are trying to project an image - and for now it suits their purpose to pretend they are involved with this case.
If they happen to speak with survivors or the parents, and suggest they call Turley and see about joining this action - well - they are hardly alone. Many others do as much - and probably more - they just don't go around bragging about it.
There are indications that the law firm itself is not happy with this image Sue and Izzy are attempting to project with regard to the case - but I don't feel comfortable explaining details on an open forum about a case that is active. Its not as if I am in any way privileged to "inside info" - but as you might imagine, I do hear a bit about it from time to time.
As I tried to explain before - I think (as in speculate) they are avoiding the distraction of going after Sue more because of the mess it might create with other parents who did a lot of referring, than out of any concern for her.
I also *speculate* others are working on the problem of PURE, and possibly CACA; and if so, will no doubt be able to concentrate on that problem - and so do a more effective job. Just as Turley is concentrating on WWASPS, so as to be able to do a more effective job.
I have seen every indication they are doing what needs to be done, to do the job they have said they intend to do.
Now - the only reason I feel a need to try and provide my perspective, is a concern that kids who really ought to call Turley about this case, might not, if they see you guys going on about the involvement of these two (well, call them what you will. You know who I mean) when in truth they have nothing to do with it.
Psy - as to your very interesting post of last night - way to go dude. More power to ya.
I'm not sure I understand whats up with these emails you got from Izzy. . . Did she think she had found relevant person's home addresses - and send the email in an attempt to prove it - so as to scare you? Do I have that right?
If so, I'd guess it is more about having you fear her filing a case against you - which she would need a home address to do; as opposed to a threat to do a hit - but then again - who knows what she is capable of? She has never yet ceased to amaze me.
