My counter to Kev's nonsense is as follows:
Sure, if you enumerate what is safe, effective, unabusive, and actually share with us what it is you find to be "good".
By nature in REAL medical treatment, you protect rights and are as un-restrictive as possible. That being, unless a DOCTOR says the kid needs to be locked up, he/she should not be incarcerated!
Also, LGATs of any sort.... are you saying that can be acceptable?
What about consent?
What if its a case of parents unable or unwilling, why should THEY be locked up?
Until you can answer these questions... what the hell do you expect? Shunning WWASPS but defending programs in general is just the same kind of apologist bullshit that Lon pulls. You can't say "you're too general" then be that general yourself.
I expect nobody to answer this or do anything but jack the thread or attack me, but oh well!