As here, some fair questions get asked, but because there is a "therapeutic" element and it is a boarding school, it gets condemned by people with no real knowledge about it. At least condemnation ought to be based on facts of bad things and not generic presumption.
Look at the schools website. Among other things, they want parents to visit before making application. They encourage parents to spend a few days in the school with the kids following their routine. Who is hiding from what, or hiding what?
In other topics, some "regulars" acknowledge either that there are, or may be, or could be some good places -- which degree of accepting a place as good varying by individual. So why can't Sarasota Community School be good?
Clearly, the subject 16 y.o. needs a change of environment, if only to get his body clear of drugs. He also needs to experience positive things without drugs. And, he likely would benefit from some therapy/counselling. There are lots of ways to get to those things, and none are as easy as we may like.
Remember the originator said "he's been in therapy for over a year, medicated, off medication, on medication....his social circle is exclusively about drug use "I need a sack dude!"...
He's in or very close to crisis...I'm primarily trying to keep him out of prison AND make some changes too....
Before you all accuse me of being a faulted parent,... understand that I've read this forum ENDLESSLY and believe we have been doing exactly what is suggested. IT"S NOT WORKING... "
More of the same is supposed to be better??? Just because it isn't residental and therapeutic? Oh yeah --- phosps aren't automatically good either.