I can't imagine any parent sending their kid to a program af

[TheWho]

On 2006-06-06 17:26:00, Anonymous wrote:

"The who needs to read the Whitmore threads.

DUH. Maybe him realizing the owner is facing a criminal child abuse trial in September MIGHT open his closed eyes."

Thanks Anon -
I havent heard much about Whitmore, thanks for the heads up.  Do you recommend any specific thread which will give me a cross section on what the school is like?

[Anonymous]

On 2006-06-06 16:42:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Who, your relentless, monomaniacal trolling and complete lack of knowledge of what you're talking about disgusts and appalls me. Please stop posting here.



- A Parent"

A Parent-  Doubtful.

[Anonymous]

Unlike your various anonymous postings, TheWho, I am not a registered user trying to make an anonymous shadow following.

- A Parent (not DJ)

[TheWho]

On 2006-06-06 19:48:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Unlike your various anonymous postings, TheWho, I am not a registered user trying to make an anonymous shadow following.



- A Parent (not DJ)"

Sorry DJ, I do recognize your style.  Not a big deal to me, though, lets move on.

[Anonymous]

You have finally lost it Thewho.  :lol:

[Troll Control]

On 2006-06-06 20:34:00, TheWho wrote:

"

On 2006-06-06 19:48:00, Anonymous wrote:


"Unlike your various anonymous postings, TheWho, I am not a registered user trying to make an anonymous shadow following.





- A Parent (not DJ)"

Sorry DJ, I do recognize your style.  Not a big deal to me, though, lets move on.

"

 :lol: This was not me.  Who, you're ridiculous.  "Caught using bad facts"?  Well, that's you again.  Feel free to have the site admin or a moderator confirm what I said.  I have a login and I use it.  How many times do I have to reiterate this fact?  Check into it, and pleae, by all means let everyone know what you've found.

Apparently everyone who disagrees with you must be me.  Have you ever stopped to think that you are actually just quite simply an embarrassment to other parents/program supporters?

BTW, this was posted during my lengthy commute home from work, not only did I not do it, I couldn't have done it.

Make sure you get back to everyone with a confirmation from the admin.  I know you won't follow up because you'll have to eat your moronic words yet again... :lol:

[wild fig]

On 2006-06-07 04:19:00, Dysfunction Junction wrote:


"Apparently everyone who disagrees with you must be me."  


This is hardly different than you calling me Karen every time I disagree with you, DJ.

[wild fig]

Lon, I mean TSW,

If I get all dramatic and promise to never post again, may I have my own forum, too?

[wild fig]

TSW,

It may have been fair to the OP on your thread to tell her that I am not Karen- that sometimes there are differing viewpoints that come from more than one person.  

I do appreciate you clearing that up and will continue to use my login when I come around.

[Troll Control]

On 2006-06-07 04:36:00, wild fig wrote:

"On 2006-06-07 04:19:00, Dysfunction Junction wrote:




"Apparently everyone who disagrees with you must be me."  





This is hardly different than you calling me Karen every time I disagree with you, DJ."

don't worry.  your story is going to come out.  you asked for the mods to check your ip addy right?  how about we link all your posts to your username?  let's set the record straight.

[Troll Control]

On 2006-06-07 04:36:00, wild fig wrote:

"On 2006-06-07 04:19:00, Dysfunction Junction wrote:




"Apparently everyone who disagrees with you must be me."  





This is hardly different than you calling me Karen every time I disagree with you, DJ."

If calling you "Karen" gets you to log in and be accountable for your statements, that's fine with me.

If you're not her, that's fine, too. Use your login and you'll avoid any confusion.

[Troll Control]

Okay, DJ, you logged in 1 out of 3 times, which is getting better.

Let me know when you verify this with the site admin.  Be sure to post your findings!

Once again, not me.  Unlike yourself, I do have the nuts to say what I mean and sign it.

You're a joke, Who.  Just keep on making it up as you go along.  Remember, if you really believe it it's not a lie...

To answer your question , yes I am comparing Rudy Bentz and Tim Brace to Ben Franklin and Bill Gates.

You're a sick puppy.  This says a lot about your sycophantic tilt.  You idolize child abusers.  ::bangin::

[TheWho]

On 2006-06-07 08:01:00, Dysfunction Junction wrote:

"

Okay, DJ, you logged in 1 out of 3 times, which is getting better.

Let me know when you verify this with the site admin.  Be sure to post your findings!



Once again, not me.  Unlike yourself, I do have the nuts to say what I mean and sign it.



You're a joke, Who.  Just keep on making it up as you go along.  Remember, if you really believe it it's not a lie...

To answer your question , yes I am comparing Rudy Bentz and Tim Brace to Ben Franklin and Bill Gates.

You're a sick puppy.  This says a lot about your sycophantic tilt.  You idolize child abusers.  ::bangin::


"

Ha,Ha,  you are too funny,  I even underlined it for you and you still missed it (you seem to just hear only what you want to).  Here I will cut and past it for you or you can go back and reread the thread:


For you I will explain:

I am not saying they have the same moral values, the same ethnic back ground, hair color or religions. But they were founders, when using an analogy you must assume that the recipient will know enough to search and understand the connection you are trying to make and you seem to struggle in this area. So, yes, they are totally different people but the analogy bridges them together for maybe one thing they have in common. You miss it every time and each time you seem so miffed.

If this still gets by you we will just move on and I will try to reiterate future analogies in simpler terms for ya to save time and database space.

[Troll Control]

Oh, don't flatter yourself with creating analogies too complicated for the layman.  Your analogy sucks.  I understand it fully, it's just stupid.

You defeat your own logic.  Let me illustrate:

Franklin and Gates were both "founders."  Both of them had/have an ideology around which they framed their ideas.  Today, even though there are different faces, the framework remains the same, just as ASR and Carlbrook were founded on the framework and ideas of child abusers and the new faces use the same framework today.  What's so hard to understand about that?

I think you get upset because of the fact that people "don't understand" you because you are nonsensical.  It's not their fault, it's yours.

Get a grip.

I see you avoided checking up on the anon posts.  That figures.

Like I said, just keep making it up as you go along and "don't stop believing..."   :lol:

_________________
"Compassion is the basis of morality."

-Arnold Schopenhauer[ This Message was edited by: Dysfunction Junction on 2006-06-07 08:39 ]

[TheWho]

Somewhere in all of that I think you said you reread the post, thank you.  A stupid analogy?  Maybe, but the whole point is to get people to think about a subject from a different angle which is difficult for some people if they have held the same view point for a long time, analogies is a way to refresh ones point of view (not change it).