On 2005-10-18 14:01:00, Anonymous wrote:
"Swift River can not be placed on the "Good School List." There are some basic standards that must be met to get on the GOOD LIST:
Accreditation
Certified Teachers
Adult Supervision: NOT supervision by PEERS
Realization that this is a "SCHOOL"--not a FAMILY...these kids already have a family.
Inclusion of all kids in all activities
Licensed by the State
So, sorry! Swift River will not do.
LIST the other schools you know that are "good."
"
I don't agree with your criteria. For instance, if all kids are included in all activities, there is nothing for others to work toward. Motivation is already a problem for most teens. Another problem: Some states don't have licensing. Does that preclude programs in those states doing a good job? And having accreditation and certified teachers: What about all the programs whose students attend public high schools?
I think your post does point up one problem: Because there are so many good ways to approach working with kids, coming up with criteria to apply across the board is tough. Maybe one question could be "Does this program do what it says it does," i.e. if it claims accreditation, it ought to have it.
Another problem that's illustrated by your post is the tendency of most of us to think we can define success for a particular kid or family. No wonder kids are confused.
For a lot of parents, success has been measured in accumulation of goods. The kids show that through their disregard for things like education, personal integrity, a commitment to good health, etc.
It might not hurt here to open your mind to other approaches, and identify things to agree on: basic safety and access to medical care; a good meds policy; close family participation and communication; clear and honest representation of program operations.
At any rate, from my own personal experience, here are some programs I know to be very good:
Spring Creek
Explorations
Montana Academy
Monarch
Mission Mountain
Anyone have some to add?