Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Hyde Schools
NOTICE TO POTENTIAL PARENTS
Antigen:
--- Quote ---On 2005-10-09 13:50:00, Anonymous wrote:
I disagree with the poster who thought you may be a lawyer. I believe you are a liar, not a lawyer (although those terms are somewhat interchangable). You should edit your posts with the help of a dictionary and review basic grammar rules, as you have scarcely a clue as to how to construct a proper sentence.
--- End quote ---
Maybe HF got their degree from Southern Methodist University? :rofl:
Wicked men obey from fear, good men from love.
--Aristotle
--- End quote ---
Anonymous:
Why even bother to reply to this Ass Hole, (HydeFan) on this thread? Just brings more attention to him. Attention that he doesn't deserve!! No one was threatening or saying anything derogatory to him yet he had the need to lash out at anyone who didn't agree with Hyde's methods! Real Jerk!!
HydeFan:
--- Quote ---On 2005-10-09 17:44:00, Anonymous wrote:
"No one was threatening or saying anything derogatory to him yet he had the need to lash out at anyone who didn't agree with Hyde's methods! Real Jerk!!"
--- End quote ---
I loved the irony in this one. Really! I actually laughed out loud. No one was saying anything derogatory to me....but I'm a real jerk? Do you see the irony? See you said something derogatory right after saying no one was saying anything derogatory. Let's not forget that you needn't read far above to see quotes to the effect that I am "kool-aid drinking" "full of shit" "fucking asshole" whose mind was "raped" at Hyde. Nope, nothing derogatory there either. Phew!
Now, I challenge you to go back and look at my posts for anything similar. I *think* about the most I have done in terms of lashing out is, on the basis of fairly solid evidence, to call someone a liar. I probably digressed a couple times beyond that, but hardly any lashing out. I'm mostly trying to stick to provable facts so we can see who is actually lieing.
To that end, let's look at some other interesting quotes of late....
--- Quote ---I would NEVER devulge the name of this student because this was a horrible crime. No one who had this happen to them deserves to have this published. I obviously have more integrity than you!
--- End quote ---
Bravo!!! Very noble of you. How unselfish to potentially secrifice winning the argument by protecting the down-trodden victim. I guess my only question then is, how do you explain the next two quotes?
--- Quote --- Hey HydeFan, why don't you have the courage to ask a certain headmaster whether it is true that his son was gang raped while at the Bath Campus. He spoke about it in group and I seriously doubt he made it up! What irks me is how they chose never to call in the authorities.
--- End quote ---
--- Quote --- Speaking of legalities, is anyone aware of the rape of a certain son of a headmaster? WHY did someone who professes character and integrity not report this to the authorities when it happened? I feel very sorry for this poor kid, not being able to count on his own parents to protect him!
--- End quote ---
Did I miss something, or did you not just disclose who the victim was, the one you now claim to be protecting?
Anyway, despite your protests and outrage of concern over not identifying the victim, looks to me like you've actually done that in two separate posts. That would make you....yes, sadly, a liar. (Oh, and self-righteous too. I guess that means I ain't the only one with that chip on his shoulder, eh amigo?)
Or maybe those were posted by someone else, and we have two anonymous posters here claiming to have been in the seminar where this was divulged.
Getting back to the topic of lies though, which was how we got into all this in the first place, I thought now would be a good time for a more comprehensive revisiting of the other posts you (or your brethren) have made:
--- Quote --- Hyde has a LEGAL obligation as a school to notify the authorities when there has been sexual abuse at their school. Hyde feels they are above the law and can handle everything through seminars and FLC's. Hate to tell you this, but there are laws in the U.S. and they are there to protect our youth. Hyde is NOT ABOVE THE LAW even though they think they are!
--- End quote ---
--- Quote ---Hyde does have a legal duty to report crimes no matter who it happened to.
--- End quote ---
--- Quote --- HYDE AS A SCHOOL had an obligation to report this. ...it is mandatory for Hyde to report crimes they are aware of and they were absolutely aware of this.
--- End quote ---
--- Quote --- Any teacher or staff member who did not report this abuse has violated the law and should be terminated and prosecuted.
--- End quote ---
What do all these statements have in common? They are, as far as anyone can tell or has been able to show (though I was and remain open to there actually being a law to the contrary) not true.
And in my posts, I merely used them as support for the proposition that the poster was out of control in his anger and that parents should take note, since if he lies about this, what else do you need to know?
Indeed, we still don't have an answer to the innuendo posted above (see my last post). Nope, cut and run, call people names, and change the story. That brings us to the most recent version of the story (version 3 now, or is it 4):
--- Quote --- Facts:
1) Several boys sodomized a student at Hyde within the last 10 years
2) This CRIME was handled "in house" through seminaring. The boy spoke out about it.
3) ....Fact is a boy was raped and it was not reported to the police.
--- End quote ---
Fact is. "Fact" "is". Those are strong words. It is commendable you have finally relented about the legal obligation, even if instead of apologizing for your lack of intergrity you try and make me the heavy for your having made those statements in the first place. Indeed, I probably coaxed you into making that lie, so, hey, my bad!
But I keep thinking about the words "Fact is". "Fact is it was not reported to the police". Well, I have to ask the obvious: how on God's green earth would you know the answer to that? That's all I've been asking for, five hundred and fifty posts later (
Anonymous:
To Other Anonymous,
Only a handful of people could be this arrogant. Has to be either Joe or Malcolm Gauld!!
Anonymous:
he has a point, u couldve reportd
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version