« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10   Go Down

Author Topic: CAICA  (Read 24171 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
CAICA
« Reply #15 on: June 04, 2006, 02:42:00 PM »
Quote
On 2006-06-04 11:09:00, Anonymous wrote:

"This forum used to have very useful topics at the top, now its filled with this crap. It seems like a disinformation campaign to me, start infighting amongst the various survivor groups. Effective strategy, I might add."


Personally, I think that might be a matter of opinion.  What's crap to you might be important to someone else.  

Besides, you do have the option of not reading posts or threads that don't meet your standard of non-crap.

Use it or lose it.

 :smokin:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
CAICA
« Reply #16 on: June 04, 2006, 02:45:00 PM »
Isn't SUE SCHEFF the real board of directors for CA-CA.  And CA-CA is the board of directors for PURE.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
CAICA
« Reply #17 on: June 04, 2006, 02:48:00 PM »
Quote
On 2006-06-04 11:42:00, Anonymous wrote:

"
Quote

On 2006-06-04 11:09:00, Anonymous wrote:


"This forum used to have very useful topics at the top, now its filled with this crap. It seems like a disinformation campaign to me, start infighting amongst the various survivor groups. Effective strategy, I might add."





Personally, I think that might be a matter of opinion.  What's crap to you might be important to someone else.  



Besides, you do have the option of not reading posts or threads that don't meet your standard of non-crap.



Use it or lose it.



 :nworthy:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
CAICA
« Reply #18 on: June 04, 2006, 02:51:00 PM »
Regarding the Board of Directors for CAICA:

In light of that published article (about SCL) that states CAICA has a Board, asking questions about it is a perfectly legitimate NON-CRAPPY question.  

Don't shoot the messenger.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
CAICA
« Reply #19 on: June 04, 2006, 04:34:00 PM »
Quote
On 2006-06-04 10:22:00, Anonymous wrote:

"
Quote

On 2006-06-04 09:59:00, Anonymous wrote:


"Some article a while back said a lawmaker from Montana was on the CAICA board of directors.





Is this true? "




CAICA has the article on her website, copied from the original source, and yeah, the article says something about a Montana lawmaker being on the newly formed Caica's board of directors.



http://www.caica.org/NEWS%20SCL%20Short ... -16-05.htm



The future of teen programs and the level and scope of state regulation is a battle that will continue into the 2007 legislative session. Proponents of teen therapeutic and wilderness programs will push for self-regulation and licensure. Groups like the Coalition Against Institutionalized Child Abuse (CAICA) and the International Survivors Action Committee (ISAC) are working on community awareness and outreach to educate parents, legislators, and legal and health professionals on the tactics used by teen programs.



Sen. Trudi Schmidt now sits on the board of directors for the newly formed CAICA.
 "


this was once the case, not anymore, until the senator realized this woman was not very effective or a good ally.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
CAICA
« Reply #20 on: June 04, 2006, 05:17:00 PM »
Quote
On 2006-06-04 13:34:00, Anonymous wrote:

"
Quote

On 2006-06-04 10:22:00, Anonymous wrote:


"
Quote


On 2006-06-04 09:59:00, Anonymous wrote:



"Some article a while back said a lawmaker from Montana was on the CAICA board of directors.







Is this true? "







CAICA has the article on her website, copied from the original source, and yeah, the article says something about a Montana lawmaker being on the newly formed Caica's board of directors.





http://www.caica.org/NEWS%20SCL%20Short ... -16-05.htm





The future of teen programs and the level and scope of state regulation is a battle that will continue into the 2007 legislative session. Proponents of teen therapeutic and wilderness programs will push for self-regulation and licensure. Groups like the Coalition Against Institutionalized Child Abuse (CAICA) and the International Survivors Action Committee (ISAC) are working on community awareness and outreach to educate parents, legislators, and legal and health professionals on the tactics used by teen programs.





Sen. Trudi Schmidt now sits on the board of directors for the newly formed CAICA.

 "




this was once the case, not anymore, until the senator realized this woman was not very effective or a good ally."


Are you saying there is no board of directors or there is, but the Montana lawmaker decided to jump ship?  Sorry, but it would be nice to clarify this issue, to be fair to CAICA while at the same time keeping the public informed as to what CAICA is (or isn't).  Claiming to have a Board of Directors but not providing the public with their charter (or even a way to verify if there is a Board) seems rather foolhardy, if you ask me.

 :silly:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
CAICA
« Reply #21 on: June 04, 2006, 05:54:00 PM »
Quote




Are you saying there is no board of directors or there is, but the Montana lawmaker decided to jump ship?  Sorry, but it would be nice to clarify this issue, to be fair to CAICA while at the same time keeping the public informed as to what CAICA is (or isn't).  Claiming to have a Board of Directors but not providing the public with their charter (or even a way to verify if there is a Board) seems rather foolhardy, if you ask me.



 :silly: "

And aren't non-profit's obligated to name their board?  Maybe its not even a non for profit?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
CAICA
« Reply #22 on: June 04, 2006, 05:55:00 PM »
Quote




Are you saying there is no board of directors or there is, but the Montana lawmaker decided to jump ship?  Sorry, but it would be nice to clarify this issue, to be fair to CAICA while at the same time keeping the public informed as to what CAICA is (or isn't).  Claiming to have a Board of Directors but not providing the public with their charter (or even a way to verify if there is a Board) seems rather foolhardy, if you ask me.



 :silly: "


And aren't non-profit's obligated to name their board?  Maybe its not even a non for profit?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
CAICA
« Reply #23 on: June 05, 2006, 12:08:00 AM »
The name CAICA doesn't make a lot of sense.
Coalition Against Institutionalized Child Abuse.

Coalition is usually defined as "a TEMPORARY alliance for a combined joint action or purpose."

Maybe Izzy doesn't plan on Ca Ca being around long.  Sort of like Kids in Captivity, HUH?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
CAICA
« Reply #24 on: June 05, 2006, 12:26:00 AM »
based on an online corporation search, caica does not appear to exist as an entity of any kind in the state of Washington, nor does it seem to appear as a non-profit organization in the online files of the IRS. maybe it is based elsewhere or it could just be a site on the net.

 :???:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
CAICA
« Reply #25 on: June 05, 2006, 01:18:00 AM »
oops...remember CAICA didn't have a Mission Statement when that question came up? Then the next day! There was Izzy's Mission Statement written out on Ca Ca.
Wanna bet Ca Ca might be "incorportated" and filed as a "non-profit" this time tomorrow??????
Betcha!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
CAICA
« Reply #26 on: June 05, 2006, 10:15:00 AM »
Quote
On 2006-06-04 11:51:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Regarding the Board of Directors for CAICA:



In light of that published article (about SCL) that states CAICA has a Board, asking questions about it is a perfectly legitimate NON-CRAPPY question.  



Don't shoot the messenger.







"



Has it dawned on you yet that almost nothing in that published article was true? It was written by a buddy of Isabelle's, and she was the main source (aka "anonymous").
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
CAICA
« Reply #27 on: June 05, 2006, 10:21:00 AM »
Kike-a. :lol:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
CAICA
« Reply #28 on: June 05, 2006, 12:44:00 PM »
Maybe Izzy's friend Sue Scheff can advise Izzy on name changes and all that for-profit-OR-not-for-profit-stuff.

In her testimony in the the WWASP vs PURE on page 165, SCHEFF:

"It was orginally Parents Universal Referral Agency.
We changed it to Parents Universal RESOURCE Agency.
...PURE was established as a 501(c) under the PURE Foundation, and later changed within a year to a S-corp."
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
CAICA
« Reply #29 on: June 05, 2006, 12:58:00 PM »
Quote
On 2006-06-05 09:44:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Maybe Izzy's friend Sue Scheff can advise Izzy on name changes and all that for-profit-OR-not-for-profit-stuff.



In her testimony in the the WWASP vs PURE on page 165, SCHEFF:



"It was orginally Parents Universal Referral Agency.

We changed it to Parents Universal RESOURCE Agency.

...PURE was established as a 501(c) under the PURE Foundation, and later changed within a year to a S-corp."



"


There's that "We" stuff again.  Who is we?

 :???:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10   Go Up
« previous next »