« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6   Go Down

Author Topic: Ridge Creek: Program Effectiveness  (Read 13869 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Ridge Creek: Program Effectiveness
« Reply #45 on: December 20, 2005, 05:07:00 PM »
So you wont even acknowledge that the situation even suggest (not stating for a fact simply suggest the possibility) of impropiety?

Simply a yes or no answer.

Yes there's the possibility.

No absolutely no way.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline SHH Anon Classics

  • Posts: 574
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?topic=13488&forum=41&start=34#165552
Ridge Creek: Program Effectiveness
« Reply #46 on: December 20, 2005, 05:22:00 PM »
How do you know it's not a definate no? You have no way of knowing what kind of knowledge I have of this relationship. You wanted an answer, the answer is no impropriety.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Ridge Creek: Program Effectiveness
« Reply #47 on: December 20, 2005, 05:27:00 PM »
Okay thats all I really needed from you.

Could you do us all a favor though and pick a user name.

That way it would be easier to automatically pass over and discount anything you might say irregardless of the content.

You have shown that you are oblivious ignorant and blind to anything other than what Papa Buch tells you to think.

How will you ever make it in the real world I wonder?

Well Im sure theres a nice cult you can join that will give you basically the same thing.

So like I said pick a user name and save us all alot of time. Thanks.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline SHH Anon Classics

  • Posts: 574
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?topic=13488&forum=41&start=34#165552
Ridge Creek: Program Effectiveness
« Reply #48 on: December 20, 2005, 05:30:00 PM »
Whats the matter Mr. Bruce? You didn't like the answer? That is why you don't get your questions answered. You don't like the answer you get so you have to discredit the poster. Typical. If you aren't going to believe the answers given to questions you ask then don't bother asking them in the first place.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Ridge Creek: Program Effectiveness
« Reply #49 on: December 20, 2005, 05:38:00 PM »
I neither like nor dislike the answer. Oh and dont make excuses, the reason you all evade answering the questions is out of fear of the truth.

The last reponse you got was due to the fact that you have made it abundantly clear that you are nothing more than a brainwashed puppet.

Any objective person, or even a non objective person can look at that situation and say "maybe"

Ive made my feelings clear on HLA, but at the same time I wouldnt say with an absolute certianity that I knew Sen. Jackson and the Buch had made some shady deal. Im simply saying it appears that way and the evidence would seem to suggest it. There is however a chance nothing of the sort ever took place albeit I dont think so.  

You however are so blinded by your love of the Buch and the misguided notion that HLA is never wrong you refuse to even acknowledge the possibility of such a thing occuring. Why? Because as I said youre a brainwashed puppet and who cant think anything other than what Papa Buch tells you to.

Its not meant as an attempt to discredit you, you did that yourself when you refused to accept the possibility of HLA doing something immoral or wrong.

Dont get upset and blame me for your actions.

Again typical staff behavior.

Speaking of which would you be willing to share what capacity you serve at HLA?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Ridge Creek: Program Effectiveness
« Reply #50 on: December 20, 2005, 05:41:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-12-20 08:35:00, Anonymous wrote:

"
Quote

On 2005-12-20 04:37:00, Anonymous wrote:


"It is Mr. Bruce who can't acknowledge the truth even when it is put right in front of him because it is against his agenda and what he wants others to believe."


Please respond to this truth:



"Last year, research by the National Institutes of Health found that while coercive, fear-inducing treatment programs have not proven effective and could aggravate delinquent behavior, more holistic, family-centered approaches have demonstrated positive results in at-risk youth. One federal legislative proposal, the Keeping Families Together Act, would lift restrictions on a special Medicaid waiver to help families use public funds to access community-based treatment."



Please explain how your RTC is helping when all the studies ever done show that RTC's don't work and "aggravate" the kids' problems."

Why won't you answer?  You answer every other off-track post, so why not a substantive one?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Ridge Creek: Program Effectiveness
« Reply #51 on: December 20, 2005, 09:34:00 PM »
He wont answer because he has to ask Papa Buch for what hes supposed to think first. Be patient these things take time.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Ridge Creek: Program Effectiveness
« Reply #52 on: December 20, 2005, 10:13:00 PM »
I will gladly make myself known when Mr. Bruce does.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Ridge Creek: Program Effectiveness
« Reply #53 on: December 20, 2005, 11:16:00 PM »
I dont believe anyone cares who you are. You were asked in what capacity you work for HLA.

I was a former prisoner there myself.

Why are you interested in who I am?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Ridge Creek: Program Effectiveness
« Reply #54 on: December 21, 2005, 01:23:00 AM »
On further examination it appears our puppet contributer is nothing more than our regular guest star....Mrs. Susie "The Bullfrog" Gray.

If it is, then why is she even bringing this up? She has no knowledge of the workings and relationships of HLA when she was there, she definitly doesnt have any knowledge concerning it at all now.

If on the other hand its someone new, well you all sound alike anyway and get your statements from the same programming videos. So in any event tell us what in what capactiy you serve at HLA.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline SHH Anon Classics

  • Posts: 574
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?topic=13488&forum=41&start=34#165552
Ridge Creek: Program Effectiveness
« Reply #55 on: December 21, 2005, 05:16:00 AM »
Not her, sorry
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Ridge Creek: Program Effectiveness
« Reply #56 on: December 21, 2005, 10:27:00 AM »
Quote
On 2005-12-20 19:13:00, Anonymous wrote:

"I will gladly make myself known when Mr. Bruce does.   "

Hey, cop out, nobody asked for your name rank and serial number.  You were asked for your bona-fides so that we may formulate an opinion on your postings.  

Mr. Bruce has stated his: Former Patient.

What are yours?

Your failure to respond leads everyone reading this board to the conclusion that you have no credentials/experience/inside knowledge.  You cannot be taken seriously when you have demonstrated no ties to the treatment center or any relevent education whatsoever.

Why don't you get real and either admit you have no credentials or let us know why we should believe anything you say?

Thanks.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Ridge Creek: Program Effectiveness
« Reply #57 on: December 21, 2005, 10:34:00 AM »
Mr. Bruce...you should have studied at HLA ...irregardless is not a word...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Ridge Creek: Program Effectiveness
« Reply #58 on: December 21, 2005, 10:36:00 AM »
Quote
On 2005-12-21 07:34:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Mr. Bruce...you should have studied at HLA ...irregardless is not a word..."


from Mirriam Webster...

Main Entry: ir·re·gard·less
Pronunciation: "ir-i-'gärd-l&s
Function: adverb
Etymology: probably blend of irrespective and regardless
nonstandard : REGARDLESS
usage Irregardless originated in dialectal American speech in the early 20th century. Its fairly widespread use in speech called it to the attention of usage commentators as early as 1927. The most frequently repeated remark about it is that "there is no such word." There is such a word, however. It is still used primarily in speech, although it can be found from time to time in edited prose. Its reputation has not risen over the years, and it is still a long way from general acceptance. Use regardless instead.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Ridge Creek: Program Effectiveness
« Reply #59 on: December 21, 2005, 01:04:00 PM »
And you should have accepted the world outside HLA does not operate according to your rules.

You see here's proof, declaring words to be nonexistent even.

Now answer the question how are you affiliated with HLA?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6   Go Up
« previous next »