On 2006-06-09 07:32:00, TheWho wrote:
"
On 2006-06-09 07:21:00, Pls help wrote:
"I think that the great shame of it all is that the idea of Wilderness camps or outward bound programmes for older kids and teenagers is a good one in theory. It could do great things for kids and not just troubled kids.
When i was a recent uni grad (2000) I did the year off to do the back pack thing and worked in one of your American summer camps. Aside from the odd bout of home sickness the kids seemed to have a great time & be forever engaged in some kind of fun activity. They were too busy to get in trouble & the staff were mostly enthusiastic & idealistic 20 somethings who liked kids or wanted to see the world or both. The approach was about giving them a good time not punishment & it was a tradition that I always thought had a positive impact on kids.
With strict regulation & state govts to took duty of care laws seriously, & a culture which is not about being punitive but encouraging teenagers to try new things and push themselves this could be a really positive industry. What is so tragic is that most of the websites advertising these programmes (even the ones that look quite professional and safe) seem to talk about changing the way kids behave and think and in most cases this seems to involve the idea that kids are bad an so deserve to be stripped of all that they enjoy and then when they conform they can "earn" these rights back. Why emphasise a culture of treating kids as if they are irredeemable criminals when they are just young and bored and trying to figure out who they are and what they want out of life.
Why has no one just made Wilderness programmes about giving teenagers and their parents a break from each other & the stresses that are trying everybodies patience & encouraging the kids to have some fun & learn some new skills?
"
Good point ?Pls Help?. I think many of the wilderness programs are just that, hiking in the woods and staying out of trouble with counselors who like kids. But they are marketing to parents who are also looking to remove their kids from an unpleasant environment and get them back on track . Many kids have a really good experience. Like I have heard here many times ?Same place different packaging?"
This is just my point though. I have only just started to research this industry and i am sure that not every programme is designed to fail kids, but even the reputable looking ones place an emphasis on changing the kid and making the kid compliant. If a kid has a sever problem which requies clinical treatment i am flummoxed as to what a walk in the woods could do to help, but if your kid is just being adolescent & driving everone nuts in the process, there is no point in trying to change them. Sending them away for a few weeks in theory may just help everyone decompress though if it is not about the "troubled" label. But this is it. Wilderness programmes seem to push the idea that your kid is troubled or struggling.
Aaron Bacon's mother, for example, thought she was just sending him to get some exercise, talk things out with a caring adult & think things through. Because the industry markets the idea that your kid is bad & at risk of doing something criminal she sent him by escort ( i realise that the boy was experiencing some isues). How haunting must it have been for that poor woman to realise the last moments between her and her son were angry and negative. I am not suggesting that every progamme is abusive but they push the idea that your kid has something wrong with them instead of bringing out the best in the kid.