On 2005-08-26 09:52:00, odie wrote:
"How can I put this gently? You are the most arrogant mindless twit I've met in a very long time. If you want to continue this debate just email me and stop making yourself look more and more like an asshole on this site.No laws, however stringent, can make the idle industrious, the thriftless provident, or the drunken sober
--Samuel Stiles
"
That's called "projection."
There really is no debate. You don't even know the source documents that you cite in your so-called argument. You didn't even name the correct statute, much less show an iota of understanding of its content.
Why are you calling me a "mindless twit" when you have been self-revealed to be, let's say, "less than knowledgeable" on a subject in which you claim expertise?
Come on, man, for God's sake, you don't really know anything about this. You want to appear knowledgeable by "quoting" laws, but you don't even quote the right ones, and you don't understand the application of them anyway.
Who really looks like an "asshole"? Someone who logically presents facts, refutes your argument by showing the correct information, points out your errors in citing sources, or the someone who cannot construct a logical argument, cites the wrong sources entirely (or were we actually talking about tort law and not confidentiality?), has no education and has never been a therapist, but, when confronted with his glaring mistakes, resorts to name calling?
I think I'll take my chances right here in public. I'm fine with that.
Why are you calling me names instead of just admitting you cited the wrong information in a rush to try to make me look foolish? Your arrogance and one-upmanship reveal your true nature.
Really, all you have succeeded in accomplishing is debasing yourself and providing irrefutable evidence that have not a shred of understanding about that which you portray yourself an expert.
Facts are stubborn things. Cite your sources properly, construct a logical argument and don't resort to name calling simply because you are proven to be inaccurate.
Your behavior is typical of most "programmies."
You try to make a point, show your woeful inadequacy, shift the focus, and, as a last resort, engage in base affrontery and subsequently withdraw.
You're just a prototypical program "bot."
I thought "programs" taught one how to be introspective, recognize shortcomings, learn from mistakes and so forth. This is just more empirical evidence thet they don't work, or at least didn't work for you.
Good day.