Thank you to everyone who thanked me...at the beginning of last summer, my ex showed me this site (he's went to Carlbrook too). I initially posted a reply to some outside person who had a question about Carlbrook. I didn't expect to come back to this site. Now, I check it at least a few times a week. It sounds stupid to have a website be important to you but whatever. I'm trying to sort out what happened there and this site (and the people on it) have been instrumental in doing that. So thank you to everyone. Please keep writing on this site. It helps more than you know.
To use a patient's issues against him, as a form of power over him—a therapist could lose his license for something like that. It's a betrayal and abuse. And to do it in front of a group, that's public humiliation.
I feel like phrases like that get thrown around a lot here -- "lose their licenses," "abuse," etc. I'm not denying the emotional manipulations or how it fucked us up but I'm interested to know what exactly went on in LEGAL terms. Could a therapist actually lose his or her license over what went down at Carlbrook? Could anyone ACTUALLY be prosecuted for child abuse? It's one thing to go, "we had to sit in Suspension for weeks, it sucked" or "how messed up was Animus?" but was any of it illegal? Yes, they violated our trust. Yes, it was manipulative. But was any of it actually illegal?
I feel like Carlbrook must be very careful about not breaking any laws. My mom told me this a few months ago: When I first started at Carlbrook (I couldn't have been more than a post-Integ @ this point), she had a bunch of Carlbrook parents from the area over for dinner and Tim Brace and a member of the transition staff came too. Tim kept selling Carlbrook and my mom went, "Well, I mean, it's basically just a cult, right?" (she didn't mean it in an attacking way, just an honest, half-joking way) and Tim pushes his seat back from the table and gets flustered and defensive and keeps saying no no no it's not at all and then in the end he admits that Carlbrook used many cult-like practices but they have to be very careful about saying the word "cult" because of some formal state statutes because they'd get in trouble.
I love Tim Brace. I think he's a loving father figure who genuinely means well. Do I think he's perfect? Of course not. I think he's had a really tough life; I think he's been dealt some really unfair cards. However, I think he's risen above any "sob story" he could have used as an excuse and worked extremely hard to help people in pain. I love the man with my whole heart but I'm not naive enough to not see his flaws: I think he's needy. I don't understand the pathological
need he has for
everyone to love him. I resent him for only stepping in to play the "good guy" part (he got to be all nice and understanding but that was only because he didn't have the responsibilities that the advisers did to punish/regulate/whatever us -- it made me mad how he'd agree with me that XYZ wasn't fair but then wouldn't do anything to stop/prevent XYZ).
But, at the end of the day, I think he believed in what he was doing. I love him for that. Do I agree with everything he did? No, I don't support the system that he supports. But I can't fault him for it. He sincerely loves every kid that walks in the doors of the Commons. He honestly thinks that what he is doing is right. Some of it is in my eyes, some of it isn't. But I would rather have someone like Tim than someone like Denise Prendergast or Nathan Webber who seemed sadistic and stupid and inappropriate and petty and mean who I think manipulated the system and used their power to fuck with kids and play favorites. Also, Tim is receptive.
When I went back for Veneratio, I was able to sit down with him and say, "Tim, X was really messed up. Y really hurt me. You should change Z. You're hurting kids by doing XYZ." I expected him to tell me to get out because I would poison the kids' workshop or something but instead, he just held me and hugged me and apologized. He said, "I'm so sorry, I'm so sorry. None of this was ever meant to hurt you. All we wanted to do was love you and help you." For most of the Veneratio breaks, Tim and I sat in a corner with another girl talking about the parts of Carlbrook that we wanted to change and that had hurt us. He explained to us the reasoning behind the parts that had fucked with us. He listened when we told him how things should be done. I seriously believe that he
heard us. Some things have changed at Carlbrook. Not a lot, but some.
Speaking of which...I had my last Transition Call the other day. I was ranting to my transition adviser about the confusion I feel towards Carlbrook -- how I love it so much but hate it at the same time, do I have Stockholm Syndrome, do I have PTSD, did Carlbrook hurt more than it helped, this part of it was so unforgivably hurtful, I still have bad dreams about that part, you should tell the kids this at the beginning, you need to individualize the process more, etc. She told me that she wanted me to write down a list of all the problems that I have about Carlbrook, all the feedback I have for the staff, all the ways I want it to change, and they'd go over it in a Board Meeting. So do you guys have anything you want to add to the list? Please let me know.
For the record, the Board is Tim Brace, Grant Price, Justin Merritt, Andy Coe, Kelly Dunbar, John Henson, Dr. Bender, Jonathan Gurney, and Gillan. I trust Jonathan Gurney and Dr. Bender completely. Tim and Andy I love so much but I can also see their flaws -- Tim is more accepting of criticism than Andy is but I think they're both good people who would listen to our complaints. Kelly, John, Justin, and Grant are too far removed from the therapy process to take any of our feedback personally. My feelings for Gillan are complicated...I hate his assistant dean, Greta. I think his approach to therapy is completely WRONG (totally clinical, very detached, all about pills and diagnoses rather than feelings). But he saved my best friend's life and he seems like he would see feedback/criticism as interesting rather than an attack. Sooo...I think the Board would be the best group of people to go to in this situation. Also, we can present direct criticism towards specific advisers since they won't be in this meeting.
(I just realized how completely obvious it is who I am now that I said all of this. Oh well. I don't really care.)
Sorry for the really long post, guys...in summary:
Are any of the things they do to us @ Carlbrook actually ILLEGAL? What can therapists actually lose their licenses for (other than sex with patients/ignoring suicidal threats)? Give me any criticism/feedback you have for Carlbrook staff so I can give it to the Board.