The question was about anonymous posters.
If so, thank you Alex. I am the mother of a successful RMA grad and I am interested in a place to be in touch with the experiences of other parents (and kids) who have been in a CEDU school--- for reasons of research and technical understanding.
It seems like people are more real, as well as more decent and respectful, if they have to attach some kind of identifier to their posts. Maybe it's sad that it has to be that way, but that seems to be how it is.
Not that a name guarantees sane or decent behavior. Look for example at the Fornit's site to see some really sad behavior, with and without identifiers.
Earlier in the year, I found the Fornit's site and tried to understand the experiences of students who felt that they did not benefit from CEDU. I really wanted to comprehend why this was so---my initial thinking was that perhaps these reactions were based on isolated experiences with bad counsellors in one school or another.
Eventually, it was my conclusion that the people who responded with vehemently anti-CEDU remarks (in some cases, even with death threats directed toward me or my family), likely had "issues" that were beyond what any non-lock-down program could deal with. Of course this is useful information to have, but probably does not address any detriments or strengths that the more typical student might identify in the CEDU experience.
I would really like to hear about how CEDU (that is, the specific schools) was for anyone who reads this. I am interested in critical, as well as positive posts--omitting threats, abuse, etc. (el a Fornits') would be greatly appreciated. And facilitated by Alex's excellent plan to eliminate anons
