Inga, my dear. Whenever I talk on this site, I always use my name, if you bother to read. And, I do not allow my 12 year old daugher to read, write on, or even know this site exists. She most certainly has heard all of you teenagers use you foul Cheryl-approved-improper-language enough in her two months at Whitmore to last her a life-time. My daughter came home reporting that while under Cheryl's supervision at a public movie theatre that one of you foul-talking girls confessed in group to giving a "hand job" to one of the boys. And I was so worried that my daughter AT WORSE would be indoctrinated into a religion that conflicted with the one we practice in our home.
Now how shocked do you think we were to have this little girl reporting sexual activities to us? And reports of abuse? And telling us how Cheryl Sudweeks confides in you kids in her Group Sessions about her inadequate sex life with Mark?
So, Inga---anything I have to say, I say it openly. And my little girl will never have anything to say on this site.
I believed Cheryl Sudweeks when she told us she understood adopted kids. She said her understanding camed from her experience of ADOPTING HER DAUGHTER DARLENE. Well, that was just another lie that Cheryl Sudweeks fed us, Inga. I have read court papers that state firmly that she and Mark never adopted Darlene. Darlene was a foster child, period.
So why don't you attack Cheryl Sudweeks for awhile, and ask that woman why everything that comes out of her mouth is a lie.
And ask her what pleasure she gets out of tormenting you girls and pitting you against each other like you are doing on this site?
Will it be you and Hannah cursing each other tomorrow? Sure it will be if Cheryl Sudweeks orders you to do so.
Joyce Harris