Its time for some damn ANSWERS from PURE

[Anonymous]

On 2005-03-23 11:26:00, Susan Scheff wrote:

"OK. I have nothing to hide. I will answer your questions.One at a time please.
"

I highly doubt this is Sue Scheff.  Ginger, I challenge you to verify the IP on this one.  This person is sinking to a whole new level here and using Fornits to do it.

[Antigen]

On 2005-03-23 11:34:00, Anonymous wrote:


I highly doubt this is Sue Scheff.  Ginger, I challenge you to verify the IP on this one.  This person is sinking to a whole new level here and using Fornits to do it."

Ok, how about this. I'll pull back the veil and reveal to you every post made from the IP address that username "Susan Scheff" has posted from if you'll agree that I can do the same w/ the ISP that you're using now. (of course, this must be agreeable to username "Susan Scheff" as well.)

Deal?

History does not record anywhere or at any time a religion that has any rational basis. Religion is a crutch for people not strong enough to stand up to the unkonwn without help. But, like dandruff, most people do have a religion and spend time and money on it and seem to derive considerable pleasure from fiddling with it.
--Robert A. Heinlen, American science-ficiton author

[Anonymous]

On 2005-03-23 11:40:00, Antigen wrote:

"

On 2005-03-23 11:34:00, Anonymous wrote:



I highly doubt this is Sue Scheff.  Ginger, I challenge you to verify the IP on this one.  This person is sinking to a whole new level here and using Fornits to do it."

Ok, how about this. I'll pull back the veil and reveal to you every post made from the IP address that username "Susan Scheff" has posted from if you'll agree that I can do the same w/ the ISP that you're using now. (of course, this must be agreeable to username "Susan Scheff" as well.)



Deal?

History does not record anywhere or at any time a religion that has any rational basis. Religion is a crutch for people not strong enough to stand up to the unkonwn without help. But, like dandruff, most people do have a religion and spend time and money on it and seem to derive considerable pleasure from fiddling with it.
--Robert A. Heinlen, American science-ficiton author

"

Oh, in other words, this is you posing as Sue.  Why didn't you just say so Ginger.

[Anonymous]

Ginger Carey was not at the WWASP vs PURE trial.

[Sue Your Ass Off Scheff]

Cayo, I assure you that we take every reasonable precaution before we send a child to ANY program.Our criteria is we send a team of INDEPENDENT investigators who give us a complete report on  each and every facility. In the event of an unsatisfactory rating for ANY reason, we will cross off that program for a minimum of six months. If after that period of time, that same program has not come to a satisfactory rating, we will NEVER consider that program EVER AGAIN.We follow up on every program NO MATTER HOW PERFECT THAT THEY APPEAR EVERY SIX MONTHS AND i PERSONALLY meet with the enrolled child every six months also.And finally, I DO NOT OWN ANY Escort Service. I simply refer two of them to parents when it is the ONLY CHOICE. Both of them are highly reputable and respected in this industry. Yes Ginger, if the others agree to reveal their IP'S I SURE AS HELL also agree.

_________________
I am one of the good people in all of this.[ This Message was edited by: Susan Scheff on 2005-03-23 15:43 ]

[SMOKINGINGER]

Hi, I'm Ginger, just ask me anything about Fornits.  I'm just sittin here in bumblef_ck PA smokin a good one and talkin all the trash I can.  Go ahead, ask me anything!

The great enemy of truth is very often not the lie-deliberate, contrived, and dishonest-but the myth-persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
--John F. Kennedy, U.S. President

[Cayo Hueso]

On 2005-03-23 12:04:00, Susan Scheff wrote:

"Cayo, I assure you that we take every reasonable precaution before we send a child to ANY program.Our criteria is we send a team of INDEPENDENT investigators who give us a complete report on  each and every facility.

Who are these independent investigators and what are their qualifications?

 

In the event of an unsatisfacory rating for ANY reason, we will cross off that program for a minimum of six months. If after that period of time, that same program has not come to a satisfactory rating, we will NEVER consider that program EVER AGAIN.We follow up on every program NO MATTER HOW PERFECT THAT THEY APPEAR EVERY SIX MONTHS AND i PERSONALLY meet with the enrolled child every six months also.

What would constitute an unsatisfactory rating?

The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0140440607/circlofmiamithem' target='_new'> Tacitus, Roman senator and historian (A.D. c.56- c.115)

[Anonymous]

On 2005-03-23 13:20:00, Cayo Hueso wrote:

"

On 2005-03-23 12:04:00, Susan Scheff wrote:


"Cayo, I assure you that we take every reasonable precaution before we send a child to ANY program.Our criteria is we send a team of INDEPENDENT investigators who give us a complete report on  each and every facility.

Who are these independent investigators and what are their qualifications?



 

In the event of an unsatisfacory rating for ANY reason, we will cross off that program for a minimum of six months. If after that period of time, that same program has not come to a satisfactory rating, we will NEVER consider that program EVER AGAIN.We follow up on every program NO MATTER HOW PERFECT THAT THEY APPEAR EVERY SIX MONTHS AND i PERSONALLY meet with the enrolled child every six months also.

What would constitute an unsatisfactory rating?

The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0140440607/circlofmiamithem' target='_new'> Tacitus, Roman senator and historian (A.D. c.56- c.115)

"

Cayo you are so stupid it's unreal.  Do you really think you're talking to Sue Scheff.  I see Jay Kay just signed on too.  They might need help with their spelling and syntax though?

[Cayo Hueso]

More questions...

It appears that you and your supporters are dancing a jig in celebration over ISAC being sued.  Why is that?


Why are concerned parents having problems getting answers about their kids leaving the country? http://fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?to ... m=35#90085 Does this not concern you?  

Does it concern you that there is apparently a "private parents forum" that some parents of kids IN Whitmore are not privvy to?

Does it concern you that Cheryl appears to be at the very least watching and approving of the kids in and out of Whitmore tearing each other to pieces? http://fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?to ... m=35#86385

I don't think we're here for anything, we're just products of evolution. You can say 'Gee, your life must be pretty bleak if you don't think there's a purpose' but I'm anticipating a good lunch.
--Dr. James Watson, American biologist

[Anonymous]

Would  the owners being investigated for child abuse and sexual abuse and fraud just maybe qualify as a reason for not sending more children to one of your "approved schools?"

How about if a school advertises itself as being "fully accredited" when it's not? Would that cause you to take them off your list?

Or would having a school lose it license with the State? Would that cause you to strike them off the "approved list?"

Would a school that has group therapy being led by a non-licensed person cause you any concern?

Would a school that left children alone without any adult supervision cause to the mark them down as "not approved?"

HUH?

[Anonymous]

Oh, speaking of Carey and the chairman of the Carey Sucks Club, I was dissapointed to find Carey's testimony ommitted from the PUREified version of the WWASP v PURE transcript. Anyone care to share? I honestly don't know what's in it. But I'm sure it addresses matters about which I have some longstanding curiosity. And it's got to be under oath and likely w/ x-exam and maybe even redirect. So it might provide some missing puzzle pieces here. At the very least it may make clear exactly why it was omitted.

 
Ginger Carey was not at the WWASP vs PURE trial.

[Cayo Hueso]

On 2005-03-23 13:33:00, Anonymous wrote:


Cayo you are so stupid it's unreal.  Do you really think you're talking to Sue Scheff.  I see Jay Kay just signed on too.  They might need help with their spelling and syntax though?"

Don't really know, don't really care.  I'm sure she's aware of this forum, I"m fairly sure if this isn't her that she's at least reading it.  If anyone ELSE can give answers to these questions, great.  I'd rather hear the answer from Sue, but I'm not sure if that's ever going to happen.

The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad.
-- Salvador Dali

[Antigen]

On 2005-03-23 11:50:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Ginger Carey was not at the WWASP vs PURE trial.  "

You're shittin' me! Maybe I just got confused in all the trolling. But I could swear Lee said something recently about her testifying and looking like her head would explode. And, at the time, I could swear I heard about her being there.

WTF???

Oh, btw, I wonder if we should plan an intervention for Lee. He said he couldn't make it a week on what Sue makes in a year. At the end of all the testimony, it's clear that that was over $200k. If Lee can't make it a week on that, maybe he should consider Ibogain?

Bureaucracy defends the status quo long past the time when the quo has lost its status
--Laurence J. Peter

[Cayo Hueso]

On 2005-03-23 13:33:00, Anonymous wrote:

They might need help with their spelling and syntax though?"

Got a little OCD going on there?  You really need to move on from this.  I realize that by my pointing out how absurd it was of you to attempt to correct what you thought[/b] was someone else's spelling error while not being able to spell yourself, you became embarrased but its time to move on now.  If you don't want people to embarrass you, don't be such a blatant idiot.

May 12-13: Sowed Hemp at Muddy  hole by Swamp. August 7: Began to separate the Male from the Female at Do - rather too late.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/188301123X/circlofmiamithem' target='_new'>George Washington (Diary)

[Anonymous]

Actually Cayo Hosebeast, I simply pointed out there was more than one way to spell it.  You assumed I didn't know how to spell a word, when I explained I was typing from a PDA QBOARD you asshole! :lol: