Author Topic: Corporate Welfare: Unearned Income- The Laziest in Society  (Read 2951 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Corporate Welfare: Unearned Income- The Laziest in Society
« on: October 28, 2004, 04:28:00 PM »
This thread is dedicated to those who make their living off the 'work' of others (unearned income) and receive corp welfare (our tax money) to boot. Talk about lazy!!! Social Welfare is but a small fraction of Corp Welfare.

****
McKinley or Roosevelt?  This election is as much about the past as the future...

by Thom Hartmann

From the Gilded Age to the Great Depression to today, the economic agenda of conservatives has been easily summarized in two words: "cheap labor."  Nowhere was that more clearly on display than in the recent decision by Judge William S. Howard that "relieved" coal companies from
having to pay already-earned retirement benefits to coal miners in Kentucky, West Virginia, Indiana, and Illinois.

While the coal industry spends millions on feel-good TV advertisements featuring an eagle impressed by how they're (ahem) cleaning up the
air, coal companies are cleaning up their balance sheets to give stockholders and CEOs better returns, and using bankruptcy laws to bust unions.  The new scheme is for unionized companies with pension liabilities to declare bankruptcy - during a boom time in the coal business, particularly given coal's attractiveness compared to $55/barrel oil -
and then sell their operations to each other to re-open with non-union labor.

Thousands of miners - many with serious health problems - were forced to watch helplessly this month as their pensions and health benefits
evaporated into thin air with, as New York Times writer James Dao noted, "a swipe of Judge William S. Howard's pen..."      

None of this could have been possible without generous corporate "reforms" to bankruptcy laws pushed through Congress in the last few years by conservatives, and the lifetime appointment of conservative judges to seats on federal courts by conservative administrations.  Judge Howard, for example, was appointed during the reign of George H.W. Bush, and his decisions continue to destroy union jobs and reduce labor costs for mining companies under the reign of George W. Bush.

Unions have been a bulwark of the middle class ever since the presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt.  Prior to Roosevelt's 1935 Wagner Act,
which guaranteed workers' rights to unionize, America had been mostly either very rich or very poor.  

At the founding of America, the closest we'd had to a middle class was the "plowmanry" class Jefferson exalted - small family farmers - who
were a major force in American politics from the time of the Revolution until the Civil War.  But the industrialization of America, and the formation of huge agricultural monopolies made possible by rail transportation, began to wipe out the farming middle class (leading to the
progressive Grange movement in the late 1800s), and from that time until 1935 America was increasingly a Dickensian nation of richer and poorer, with a rapidly vanishing middle class.

Workers protested, but conservatives of the Gilded Age held both economic and political power.  Eleven workers were murdered in the
Great Railroad Strike of 1877 when the B&O Railroad cut wages: That year only three national unions existed, and all were under siege.

In 1886, Boston police fired into a crowd of protestors - part of 340,000 strikers nationwide -who were calling for a change in the national
workday from 12 hours to 8.  One Boston worker died in the hail of police gunfire that injured scores of others, and four labor leaders were
hanged, seriously crippling the union movement.

Of the 12 million working families in America in the census of 1890, the average income for 11 million of them was $380/year (equivalent to
about $7900 today), keeping them deep in poverty.  In 1893, federal troops did battle with railroad strikers in 26 states, breaking a
national strike and sending labor leaders to prison.  Eleven years later, while the majority of American workers were still desperately poor, Mrs. Stuyvesant Fish made society headlines by throwing a dinner party for her dog, who made a grand entrance wearing a $15,000 diamond collar.

Following the Wagner Act's implementation, and Roosevelt's raising of the top marginal income tax rate on multi-millionaires to 90 percent,
however, the first true American middle class came into being.  By 1947, over a third (roughly 35%) of America's workers were unionized, and
for every union job there was a non-union job in the private sector with nearly identical pay and benefits, because unions had set the floor for
labor costs and employers had to compete for workers.  This meant that about 70% of American workers were able to raise a family, put children through school, pay for health care, and plan a good retirement, all on a single wage earner's salary. During this era, CEOs earned, on average, around 30 to 35 times what their lowest paid employees did, and senior management salary ratio caps averaging 20:1 were put into place in civil service, the military, and most colleges.

But in 1947 the cheap-labor conservatives fought back.  In the elections of 1946, Democrats lost control of both the U.S. House and the Senate, allowing Republican legislators to push through the Taft-Hartley bill, which essentially allowed individual states to opt out of portions of the Wagner act. It was an early domestic version of the "free trade" disaster we're seeing now with NAFTA and GATT/WTO - a race to the cheap labor bottom - that started to take root in the American south right after passage of Taft-Hartley.  Although President Harry Truman vetoed the Taft-Hartley assault on labor, Republicans in the House and Senate overrode his veto and it became law.

From then until the end of the Jimmy Carter presidency, unionization - and, thus, average worker wages in the United States - only gradually declined.  When Ronald Reagan came into office, a quarter of the American workforce was unionized, meaning half of Americans could raise a middle-class family on a single salary.

But then Reagan declared war on the middle class, starting with the air traffic controller's union (PATCO) during his first year in office.  The conservative assault on labor has been unrelenting since then: Today only about 8 percent of the private-sector American workforce is unionized, and at the same time Education Secretary Rod Paige described the teachers' union as a "terrorist organization," George W. Bush
announced plans to lay off over 700,000 unionized government employees and replace them with non-union "contractors."

While gutting the American middle class, conservatives also launched a well-funded propaganda campaign - using right-wing "think tanks" and talk radio - to convince workers that their growing economic woes were the fault of minorities ("affirmative action") and the poor ("welfare queens").  At the same time, they began stacking federal benches with conservative judges, and passing thousands of federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, and regulations that further weakened the powers of organized labor and their ability to unionize.

It's just fine, they said, for capital to organize in the form of a corporation.  It's great when corporations organize into trade
associations, chambers of commerce, industry groups, and lobbying consortiums.  But to have workers organize to level the playing field?  
Inconceivable.

The result has been an explosion in CEO and executive pay, a rush of wealth to the conservative elite (the top 10 percent of Americans now own 71 percent of the nation's wealth), and a cut in taxes to a maximum 15 percent for those who "earn their living" by sitting around the pool waiting for their dividend checks to arrive.

In 1999, Washington Post writer Dan Balz profiled Karl Rove, pointing to Rove's affection for the Gilded Age's most aggressive advocate for the strike-breakers and Robber Barons, and declarer of the Spanish-American war, President William McKinley (1896-1901).  Writes Balz: "'A
successful party,' Rove says of the GOP under McKinley, 'had to take its fundamental principles and style them in such a way that they seemed to
have relevance to the new economy, the new nature of the country and the new electorate.'"

So too, today.  Will it be Rove's McKinleyian Bush, with a "new economy" of terrified minimum-wage workers, an entrenched private-jet
conservative elite, and wars in faraway places?  Or might John F. Kerry, who often quotes Franklin D. Roosevelt and is a friend of labor, return
America to its postwar era of a growing middle class, peace, and prosperity?

"The economy is booming," millionaire TV commentators tell us from their billion-dollar corporate studio empires.  "The economy is
creating more and more wealth," say rich conservatives.  And for them, it's true, as money continues to flow from the working class up to the conservative elite and billion-dollar corporate tax cuts head legislative agendas.

Americans have a clear choice in this election year, from national to local elections.  But unless average Americans wake up to the scam
that's been foisted on them by the likes of Reagan, Limbaugh, and the Bush family, the American middle class will continue to evaporate just as fast as the now-stripped pensions of West Virginia coal miners.


Thom Hartmann (thom at thomhartmann.com) is a Project Censored Award-winning best-selling author and host of a nationally syndicated
daily progressive talk show. http://www.thomhartmann.com His most recent books are "The Last Hours of Ancient Sunlight," "Unequal Protection: The Rise of Corporate Dominance and the Theft of Human Rights," "We The People: A Call To Take Back America," and "What Would Jefferson Do?: A Return To Democracy."
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline Polarbear

  • Posts: 67
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Corporate Welfare: Unearned Income- The Laziest in Society
« Reply #1 on: October 29, 2004, 01:20:00 AM »
Wow, that's something.  Sorry to see that happen.  That is offensive in my eyes.  I don't consider that right or acceptable.  If you read A People's History of the United States it would make a little more sense to you.  I wonder how many of them will resort to sabotage and violence?
Enjoy-Polarbear
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Corporate Welfare: Unearned Income- The Laziest in Society
« Reply #2 on: October 29, 2004, 07:47:00 AM »
I've read 'A People's History' and love Zinn's work. Wish everyone would. It was refreshing (though distressing) to hear history.... from 'the people's' perspective. The private school my son attended used Zinn's book as their history text. I was thrilled.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Corporate Welfare: Unearned Income- The Laziest in Society
« Reply #3 on: October 29, 2004, 11:56:00 AM »
Excellent piece on corp welfare:
http://www.cato.org/pubs/handbook/hb105-9.html

Excerpts:
The federal government currently spends roughly $75 billion a year on programs that provide subsidies to private businesses. Two years ago both Congress and the Clinton administration pledged to attack that pervasive corporate safety net. They have had very little success. Virtually every corporate welfare program that existed in 1994 is still squandering taxpayer dollars today. Many have had their budgets increased. If the size and cost of the federal government are ever going to be reduced, those taxpayer rip-offs must be eliminated.

Terminating those programs could save taxpayers more than $400 billion over the next five years.

Perhaps the most egregious example of corporate welfare is the Agriculture Department's $100 million a year Market Access Program...

 Another example is the Commerce Department's Advanced Technology Program ($200 million a year), which gives research grants to consortiums of some of the nation's largest high-tech companies....

The Energy Department's Energy Supply Research and Development Program ($2.7 billion a year) aims to develop new energy technologies and improve on existing technologies....

The Commerce Department's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ($1.9 billion a year) provides services such as mapping, charting, and weather forecasting that are beneficial to specific private industries. Furthermore, those services are already being provided by the private sector.

The Export-Import Bank ($700 million a year) uses taxpayer dollars to provide subsidized financing to foreign purchasers of U.S. goods.

Similarly, the Overseas Private Investment Corporation ($70 million a year) provides direct loans, guaranteed loans, and political risk insurance to U.S. firms that invest in developing countries.

From a different article that I can't find a link to:
Examples of Corporate Welfare
(sources: http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa241es.html, http://www.citizen.org/congress/corwel/hitlist99.htm, and http://www.feminist.org/other/budget/we ... elfare.htm)
 
   A. Direct Grants to Businesses
    Texas Instruments
    In 1994, Texas Instruments got a $13 million handout from the Defense Department's Technology Reinvestment Project. This money was used in research and development on "Field Emissive Displays"--part of the manufacturing of televisions and computer monitors.
    Charles A. Heimbold,Jr., President & CEO, Bristol-Myers Squibb
    By 1991, Bristol-Myers Squibb had been paid $32 million in taxpayer money to develop Taxol, an anti-cancer drug.  Although the cost of developing the drug was already covered out of ordinary citizens' pockets, Bristol-Myers Squibb, with a monopoly on the drug, sold it at $1,320 for a monthly supply--a mark up of 6 - 8 times the drug's production cost.
    Sunkist Growers
    1992, Sunkist Growers received $10 million in taxpayers' money from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. This money was allocated to the well-known citrus company to help advertise its products abroad.
    Lockheed Martin
    During fiscal year 1995, the Pentagon agreed to pay Lockheed Martin $850 million in "consolidation costs."  The Pentagon also paid $100 million in bonuses to top executives of Lockheed and Martin Marietta for successfully completing the merger of the two giant military contractors.
    Michael Eisner and Disney Co.
    Taxpayers forked over $300,000 in 1995 to help Disney Co. put on a bigger and brighter nightly fireworks show. Through a Department of Energy program called "Cooperative Research and Development Agreements," the research took place at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Disney gets the commercial      benefit of this publicly funded research, and if applicable, shares developments with the armed forces.
    General Motors
    From 1990 - 1994, General Motors (GM) received more than $110.6 million in federal technology subsidies as part of a program that was supposed to create jobs. GM benefitted from this program; in 1994 they netted $4.7 billion in profits. Yet during those four years, GM slashed 104,000 jobs--25% of their U.S. workers were laid off.
       
Other examples:
Colombia/HCA Healthcare Corporation
    In April 1995, Colombia/HCA Healthcare Corporation received a $90 million tax break as a reward for locating its corporate headquarters in Nashville,TN. The Regional Medical Center in Memphis, TN used to get supplemental payments from Tennessee's Medicaid program. But in January 1993, the payments stopped and the Regional Medical Center immediately lost $42 million due to the allocation set aside for Colombia/HCA. Health services at this public hospital have been cut and the quality of treatment has declined due to lack of funding.

Archer Daniels Midland (ADM)
    ?The supermarket to the world,? Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) receives several different forms of Corporate Wealthfare. A federal law requiring automobile fuel to contain 30% ethanol (a corn derivative) also grants a $.54 per gallon tax credit kickback to ethanol producers. ADM controls 60% of the ethanol markets and siphons off  about $550 million a year.
If you are interested, the welfare received by Archer Daniels Midland?and other corporations?is further chronicled at http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa241es.html

    Below-Market Timber Sales:  U.S. Forest Service "commodity" timber sales provide timber to logging companies at below-market prices. Private timber companies end up paying only $5 per tree for timber taken from public lands. In fact, the federal timber sales program actually loses money because the amounts paid to the government by the companies buying the timber do not even cover all of the costs associated with preparing and administering the sales. The program resulted in a $111 million net loss to taxpayers in 1997 and has damaged many old growth forests and wildlife habitats.  Cost to taxpayers: $111 million annually
    Mining Giveaways:  An archaic 1872 law allows big mining corporations to pay no royalties on the billions of dollars worth of minerals they extract from public lands; these royalties would come to an average of more than $200 million each year (based on an 8% royalty rate). Furthermore, mining companies are able to acquire public lands at only $5 an acre, paying 1872 prices for land that is today worth billions of dollars. In addition, taxpayers have been saddled with the financial burden of cleaning up the destruction left by private mining on federal lands, estimated at $32 billion to $72 billion. Legislative efforts to enact a mineral royalty and create a mine reclamation program have all been blocked in Congress.  Cost to Taxpayers: $200 million annually
    Oil Royalties:  the Department of Interior's Mineral Management Service estimates that oil companies underpay by an estimated $66 million annually for oil extracted from public lands. Oil companies participate in an elaborate pricing scheme to undervalue the oil -- sometimes by as much as $2 per barrel from the actual market price -- to avoid paying the full royalties due. Attempts to end this situation and institute a market-based valuation program have been repeatedly thwarted in Congress.  Cost to Taxpayers: $66 million annually


Corporate Welfare Vs. ?Social Welfare?
    The figures reported above give us some basis for assessing how corporate welfare matches up with ?social? welfare?programs for the needy, such as TANF, food stamps, and the like?in terms of costs.
    The nation's largest corporations and richest citizens receive more welfare money than our social welfare programs. In 1994, the United States spent $104.3 billion on corporate welfare, while spending only $14.4 billion on Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC; now TANF).  If we add together recent federal monies spent on AFDC/TANF, food stamps and Medicaid, it comes to about $85 billion annually. The total cost of the corporate tax breaks and subsidies is hundreds of billions of dollars.
    Federal aid to corporations and wealthy individuals include bailouts, export promotions, loans, loan guarantees, debt forgiveness, below cost sales, interest free financing and other benefits. Barrett and Steele (1998) estimate that in 1998 corporate welfare cost the federal government $125 billion a year (note: estimates often vary, as these depend on exactly what one counts as corporate welfare; you will read precise definitions and estimates when you access the Boston Globe link a bit later).
    In general, social welfare programs account for a small amount of the national budget. AFDC [the program prior to TANF] is less than 1% of the federal budget and, on average, no more than 2% of each state's fund. (http://www.feminist.org/other/budget/we ... elfare.htm)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline Polarbear

  • Posts: 67
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Corporate Welfare: Unearned Income- The Laziest in Society
« Reply #4 on: October 29, 2004, 12:06:00 PM »
The part that really pisses me off is the gov't supporting business and research, but not deriving any additional tax revenue when they private industry hits it big based on the gov't funding.  Medicine research is funded by the gov't but they don't take any of the profits.  We get soaked twice.  Once to pay the taxes for it, and again to pay for the over-priced medicine that he paid to develope.  Enjoy-Polarbear
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Corporate Welfare: Unearned Income- The Laziest in Society
« Reply #5 on: November 04, 2004, 09:29:00 PM »
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Corporate Welfare: Unearned Income- The Laziest in Society
« Reply #6 on: November 05, 2004, 12:05:00 AM »
Quote
On 2004-11-04 18:29:00, Deborah wrote:

"New American Flag

http://www.maxiter.com/pic/bigcorporateflag.gif



"

Shit Earned income credit is as bad as cororate wellfare, unemployed refusing to work lazy asses sponge off of anybody who strives to earn more.....Get a Job Deborah and quit whinning for your own wefare.I as a tax payer don't owe YOU OR ANYBODY ELSE. I work 70 hours a week....Get your own fucking job and quit sucking off mine LAZY FUCKERS!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Corporate Welfare: Unearned Income- The Laziest in Society
« Reply #7 on: November 05, 2004, 12:23:00 AM »
It's really interesting that it's the Cato Institute, well known for its conservatism as well as its fairly doctrinaire approach to capitalist ideals should adopt such an enlightened attitude towards corporate graft.
Glad to see that they reject Socialism for the rich.

So what if Joe Blow works 70 hours per week?  Does that make him
a) a better person?
b) a victim of exploitation by the corporate Welfare bums that employ him ---
or
c) really really stupid & inefficient.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline thepatriot

  • Posts: 570
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Corporate Welfare: Unearned Income- The Laziest in Society
« Reply #8 on: November 05, 2004, 08:47:00 AM »
Quote
On 2004-11-04 21:23:00, Anonymous wrote:

"It's really interesting that it's the Cato Institute, well known for its conservatism as well as its fairly doctrinaire approach to capitalist ideals should adopt such an enlightened attitude towards corporate graft.

Glad to see that they reject Socialism for the rich.



So what if Joe Blow works 70 hours per week?  Does that make him

a) a better person?

b) a victim of exploitation by the corporate Welfare bums that employ him ---

or

c) really really stupid & inefficient."

Makes him somebody that has a good work ethic and one who is not dependent of government for handouts he should be earning himself. Just because we were born in this country does not entitle us to shit we have to work for it, or we should anyway, sounds like there are a lot of bitter, unemployable shit heads on this board that rather sit around and bitch about everything around them instead of getting off their ass and doing something for themselves
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
arasota Straight Escapee

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Corporate Welfare: Unearned Income- The Laziest in Society
« Reply #9 on: November 05, 2004, 11:08:00 AM »
What inspires your delusional slander?
I?ve had a job since I was 12. I?ve paid enough into this sink hole government that if I ever find myself dependent on welfare, I won?t feel a moment of guilt. I and many other family members have paid into OUR account. The government wouldn?t be GIVING me anything, but returning money they have been holding and capitalizing on.

And if it ever comes to that, rest assured, I will not be visualizing that money coming from your pocket. I will imagine YOUR taxes going to corp welfare whores and the murdering of innocents to ensure a steady supply of petroleum. And your money, every time you sink $60 in the tank of your SUV, going to help Exxon have another record breaking year of profit at your ignorant expense.

Your not paranoid, you are being fucked, you just don't realize who's doing the fuckin. The American Patriots Dream.... An SUV and a 70 hour work week.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline thepatriot

  • Posts: 570
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Corporate Welfare: Unearned Income- The Laziest in Society
« Reply #10 on: November 05, 2004, 11:24:00 AM »
Quote
On 2004-11-05 08:08:00, Deborah wrote:

"What inspires your delusional slander?

I?ve had a job since I was 12. I?ve paid enough into this sink hole government that if I ever find myself dependent on welfare, I won?t feel a moment of guilt. I and many other family members have paid into OUR account. The government wouldn?t be GIVING me anything, but returning money they have been holding and capitalizing on.



And if it ever comes to that, rest assured, I will not be visualizing that money coming from your pocket. I will imagine YOUR taxes going to corp welfare whores and the murdering of innocents to ensure a steady supply of petroleum. And your money, every time you sink $60 in the tank of your SUV, going to help Exxon have another record breaking year of profit at your ignorant expense.



Your not paranoid, you are being fucked, you just don't realize who's doing the fuckin. The American Patriots Dream.... An SUV and a 70 hour work week.



"


Deb, I am not the anon with the 70 hour week, SUV sure, I paid for it I pay to fill it up why is that a problem for YOU?, that's your issue not mine. You have major issues with corporate america, are you the real UNIBOMBER :lol:  :lol:  :lol: You are one uptight BIOTCH....relax already and enjoy your corporate fucking :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  and by the way when did I accuse you of not working??

_________________
Sarasota Straight Escapee
[ This Message was edited by: thepatriot on 2004-11-05 08:24 ]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
arasota Straight Escapee

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Corporate Welfare: Unearned Income- The Laziest in Society
« Reply #11 on: November 05, 2004, 03:26:00 PM »
Don't believe I addressed you Patriot?
Unless your under the delusion that your the only Patriot posting here. The Unipatriot.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline thepatriot

  • Posts: 570
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Corporate Welfare: Unearned Income- The Laziest in Society
« Reply #12 on: November 05, 2004, 03:34:00 PM »
Quote
On 2004-11-05 12:26:00, Deborah wrote:

"

Don't believe I addressed you Patriot?

Unless your under the delusion that your the only Patriot posting here. The Unipatriot."
:nworthy:  :nworthy:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
arasota Straight Escapee

Offline thepatriot

  • Posts: 570
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Corporate Welfare: Unearned Income- The Laziest in Society
« Reply #13 on: November 05, 2004, 03:36:00 PM »
Quote
On 2004-11-05 12:26:00, Deborah wrote:

"

Don't believe I addressed you Patriot?

Unless your under the delusion that your the only Patriot posting here. The Unipatriot."
:nworthy:  :nworthy: God you are one miserable individual, ya know Deb I don't think you could ever be happy
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
arasota Straight Escapee

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Corporate Welfare: Unearned Income- The Laziest in Society
« Reply #14 on: November 07, 2004, 07:16:00 PM »
World Food Day: Iraqi farmers aren't celebrating

NEWS RELEASE For immediate release

When the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) celebrates biodiversity on World Food Day on October 16, Iraqi farmers will be mourning its loss.

A new report [1] by GRAIN and Focus on the Global South has found that new legislation in Iraq has been carefully put in place by the US that prevents farmers from saving their seeds and effectively hands over the seed market to transnational corporations. This is a disastrous turn of events for Iraqi farmers, biodiversity and the country's food security. While political sovereignty remains an illusion, food sovereignty for the Iraqi people has been made near impossible by these new regulations.

"The US has been imposing patents on life around the world through trade deals. In this case, they invaded the country first, then imposed their patents. This is both immoral and unacceptable", said Shalini Bhutani, one of the report's authors.

The new law in question [2] heralds the entry into Iraqi law of patents on life forms - this first one affecting plants and seeds. This law fits in neatly into the US vision of Iraqi agriculture in the future - that of an industrial agricultural system dependent on large corporations providing inputs and seeds.

In 2002, FAO estimated that 97 percent of Iraqi farmers used saved seed from their own stocks from last year's harvest or purchased from local markets. When the new law - on plant variety protection (PVP) - is put into effect, seed saving will be illegal and the market will only offer proprietary "PVP-protected" planting material "invented" by transnational agribusiness corporations. The new law totally ignores all the contributions Iraqi farmers have made to development of important crops like wheat, barley, date and pulses. Its consequences are the loss of farmers' freedoms and a grave threat to food sovereignty in Iraq. In this way, the US has declared a new war against the Iraqi farmer.

More at: http://www.grain.org/nfg/?id=253
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700