As a parent, I couldn't agree with you more. Lots of times, I think, parents, often with the best intentions, are actually part of the problem.
And not only were we, in my child's case, part of the problems that my son was having, but, sadly, there was no way, absolutely no way, pre-emotional growth, that anyone could have convinced me of that.
I remember sitting with some socialite from New York, at the beginning of our first (required) parent workshop; we both sort of quietly made fun of the whole thing, one more "silly" little ritual that our children's misbehavior was making us go through.
After all (this was our reasoning at the time) we were successful, high achieving, rule-following people-- could there really be anything significant wrong with us?
Surely my son was the problem, this was my thinking when we sent him to RMA.
I just did not, and could not, understand that all of my own future direction, my resilience against anything that stood in my way, had the effect of minimizing and even trivializing the emotional struggles in which he was engaged.
I have to give CEDU parent programs credit for waking me up. I can remember the exact moment, in a parent workshop, when I realized that we, he and I, were in this together.
At that point, it could no longer be denied, that I had not done the things I should have to help him face the challenges that (divorce of his father, several relocations, a remarriage) that my choices had dictated that he should have to face.
It is so amazing that our experiences with CEDU, my son's and my own, continue to allow us to have a sort of a common language in how we face what life throws at us.
To the poster "mad", maybe your parents didn't get as much out of the program as I did, from your comments at least, but they obviously cared a lot about you, I mean, they could have just left you on the streets.
Someone here, I forget who, sort of mocked me for saying that the fact that parents would intervene and pay a whole lot of money to send a child to a program like CEDU could reflect their love of their child. But I think that it's true: it is certainly limited, but it is love, nonetheless to do whatever you are capable of doing for your child.