Oh my god. The Beavis and Butthead thing was hillarious. Do you have a link for it?
From Molly Ivens
Among the more amusing cluckings from the right lately is their appalled discovery that quite a
few Americans actually think George W. Bush is a terrible President.
Robert Novak is quoted as saying in all his forty-four years of covering politics, he has never seen anything like the detestation of Bush. Charles Krauthammer managed to write an entire essay on the topic of "Bush-haters" in Time magazine as though he had never before come across a similiar phenomenon.
Oh, I stretch memory way back, so far back, all the way back to--our last President. Almost
lost in the mists of time though it is, I not only remember eight years of relentless attacks
from Clinton-haters, I also notice they haven't let up yet. Clinton-haters accused the man of
murder, rape, drug-running, sexual harassment, financial chicanery, and official misconduct.
And they accuse his wife of even worse. For eight long years, this country was a zoo of
Clinton-haters. Any idiot with a big mouth and a conspiracy theory could get a hearing on radio
talk shows and "Christian" broadcasts and nutty Internet sites. People with transparent motives, people paid by tabloid magazines, people with known mental problems, ancient Clinton enemies with notoriously racist pasts--all were given hearings, credence, and air time. Sliming
Clinton was a sure road to fame and fortune on the right, and many an ambitious young rightwing
hit man like David Brock, who has since made full confession, took that golden opportunity.
And these folks didn't stop with verbal and printed attacks. From the day Clinton was elected
to office, he was the subject of the politics of personal destruction. They went after him with
a multimillion dollar smear campaign funded by Richard Mellon Scaife, the rightwing billionaire. They went after him with lawsuits funded by rightwing legal foundations (Paula
Jones), they got special counsels appointed to investigate every nitpicking nothing that ever
happened (Filegate, Travelgate), and they never let go of that hardy perennial Whitewater.
After all this time and all those millions of dollars wasted, no one has ever proved that the
Clintons did a single thing wrong. Bill Clinton lied about a pathetic, squalid affair that was
none of anyone else's business anyway, and for that they impeached the man and dragged this
country through more than a year of the most tawdry, ridiculous, unnecessary pain. The day
President Clinton tried to take out Osama bin Laden with a missile strike, every rightwinger in
America said it was a case of "wag the dog." He was supposedly trying to divert our attention from the much more breathtakingly important and serious matter of Monica Lewinsky, and who did he
think he was to make us focus on some piffle like bin Laden?
"The puzzle is where this depth of feeling comes from," mused the ineffable Mr. Krauthammer.
Gosh, what a puzzle that is. How could anyone not be just crazy about George W. Bush? "Whence
the anger?" asks Krauthammer. "It begins of course with the 'stolen' election of 2000 and the
perception of Bush's illegitimacy." I'd say so myself, yes, I would. I was in Florida during
that chilling post-election fight, and am fully persuaded to this good day that Al Gore
actually won Florida, not to mention getting 550,000 more votes than Bush overall. But I also
remember thinking, as the scene became eerier and eerier, "Jeez, maybe we should just let them
have this one, because Republican wing-nuts are so crazy, their bitterness would poison Gore's
whole Presidency." The night Gore conceded the race in one of the most graceful and honorable
speeches I have ever heard, I was in a ballroom full of Republican Party flacks who booed and
jeered through every word of it.
One thing I acknowledge about the right is that they're much better haters than liberals are.
Your basic liberal--milk of human kindness flowing through every vein, and heart bleeding over everyone from the milk-shy Hottentot to the glandular obese--is pretty much a strikeout on the hatred front. Maybe further out on the left you can hit some good righteous anger, but
liberals, and I am one, are generally real wusses. Guys like Rush Limbaugh figured that out a long time ago--attack a liberal and the first thing he says is, "You may have a point there."
To tell the truth, I'm kind of proud of us for holding the grudge this long. Normally, we'd
remind ourselves that we have to be good sports, it's for the good of the country, we must unite behind the only President we've got, as Lyndon used to remind us. If there are still some of us out here sulking, "Yeah, but they stole that election," well, good. I don't think we should forget that.
But, onward. So George Dubya becomes President, having run as a "compassionate conservative,"
and what do we get? Hell's own conservative and dick for compassion.
His entire first eight months was tax cuts for the rich, tax cuts for the rich, tax cuts for
the rich, and he lied and said the tax cuts would help average Americans. Again and again, the "average" tax cut would be $1,000. That means you get $100, and the millionaire gets $92,000, and that's how they "averaged" it out. Then came 9/11, and we all rallied. Ready to give blood, get out of our cars and ride bicycles, whatever. Shop, said the President. And more tax cuts for the rich.
By now, we're starting to notice Bush's bait-and-switch. Make a deal with Ted Kennedy to improve education and then fail to put money into it. Promise $15 billion in new money to combat AIDS in Africa (wow!) but it turns out to be a cheap con, almost no new money. Bush comes to praise a job training effort, then cuts the money. Bush says AmeriCorps is great, then cuts the money. Gee, what could we possibly have against this guy? We go along with the war in Afghanistan, and we still don't have bin Laden.
Then suddenly, in the greatest bait-and-switch of all time, Osama bin doesn't matter at all,
and we have to go after Saddam Hussein, who had nothing to do with 9/11. But he does have
horrible weapons of mass destruction, and our President "without doubt," without question,
knows all about them, even unto the amounts--tons of sarin, pounds of anthrax. So we take out
Saddam Hussein, and there are no weapons of mass destruction. Furthermore, the Iraqis are not
overjoyed to see us.
By now, quite a few people who aren't even liberal are starting to say, "Wha the hey?" We got no Osama, we got no Saddam, we got no weapons of mass destruction, the road map to peace in the Middle East is blown to hell, we're stuck in this country for $87 billion just for one year and no one knows how long we'll be there. And still poor Mr. Krauthammer is hard-put to conceive how anyone could conclude that George W. Bush is a poor excuse for a President.
Chuck, honey, it ain't just the 2.6 million jobs we've lost: People are losing their pensions,
their health insurance, the cost of health insurance is doubling, tripling in price, the
Administration wants to cut off their overtime, and Bush was so too little, too late with extending unemployment compensation that one million Americans were left high and dry. And you
wonder why we think he's a lousy President?
Sure, all that is just what's happening in people's lives, but what we need is the Big Picture.
Well, the Big Picture is that after September 11, we had the sympathy of every nation on Earth.
They all signed up, all our old allies volunteered, everybody was with us, and Bush just booted all of that away. Sneering, jeering, bad manners, hideous diplomacy, threats, demands,
arrogance, bluster.
"In Afghanistan, Bush rode a popular tide; Iraq, however, was a singular act of Presidential
will," says Krauthammer.
You bet your ass it was. We attacked a country that had done nothing to us, had nothing to do
with Al Qaeda, and turns out not to have weapons of mass destruction.
It is not necessary to hate George W. Bush to think he's a bad President. Grownups can do that,
you know. You can decide someone's policies are a miserable failure without lying awake at
night consumed with hatred.
Poor Bush is in way over his head, and the country is in bad shape because of his stupid
economic policies.
If that makes me a Bush-hater, then sign me up.
Molly Ivens
