I doubt daycare plays a role in the increase in serotonin/dopamine deficit-based disorders.
You pointed out the disorders are genetic.
Look at the time frame for when we started having lithium salts, antipsychotics (which are abusive given to normal people, but a *great* boon to schizophrenics and psychotic bipolars), and antidepressants.
ECT is also effective on major depressives, done in one *moderate* course of say, six sessions.
The thing is, effective treatments allow people like me (I have bipolar II disorder---it has the highest rate of completed suicide of any mental illness) to survive to have kids.
What that means is that people like me used to be weeded out of the gene pool, but now survive to have children. Which means a next generation with more mentally ill people in it.
Look, I'm all in favor of medication for people with major mental illnesses---it saved my life. And I'm *not* pushing some 21st century eugenics line.
I'm just admitting that the downside of saving the lives of people with major genetic illnesses like mine is more people with major genetic illnesses.
It's a downside I firmly believe we'll cope with as a society until gene therapy gives us a cure. I think that breakthrough will happen within a generation.
I also think that they'll be able to recode the genes of people like me to reduce the number of bipolar genes below the threshhold that causes mental illness (in small doses, the genes help make you smart and creative)---making it so our kids end up with the benefits but not the drawbacks.
But *right now* there's an epidemic of mental illness because mentally ill people, like me, have survived to pass on our genes for it to our kids.
Successful treatment is a mixed blessing. But all in all, it's the best choice we have.
It just makes continuing research in gene therapy and decoding the human genome vitally important---not only to those of us who have and carry genetic disorders, but also to society as a whole.
Timoclea
::alieneyesa::